| Revision as of 06:30, 17 November 2010 editFasach Nua (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers7,415 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:03, 17 November 2010 edit undoSkinny87 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers11,297 edits →Misplaced Pages:Featured_article_candidates/José_Paranhos,_Viscount_of_Rio_Branco/archive1: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| Hey Fasach. I'm removed the infobox image from this article, in part based on other comments on the FAC that agreed with your position. Although I'm sure you haven't reviewed the rest of the article to the point that you'd be ready or willing to support the nomination, I was hoping you could strike your oppose vote, since the issue you raised has now been resolved. Thanks! — <b>]] ]]</b> 01:45, 15 November 2010 (UTC) | Hey Fasach. I'm removed the infobox image from this article, in part based on other comments on the FAC that agreed with your position. Although I'm sure you haven't reviewed the rest of the article to the point that you'd be ready or willing to support the nomination, I was hoping you could strike your oppose vote, since the issue you raised has now been resolved. Thanks! — <b>]] ]]</b> 01:45, 15 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
| == Misplaced Pages:Featured_article_candidates/José_Paranhos,_Viscount_of_Rio_Branco/archive1 == | |||
| I have queried your oppose on this article, and would appreciate a response bedore you delete this notice. ] (]) 19:03, 17 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:03, 17 November 2010
!
Hong Kong FAC
Hello Fasach Nua, your concerns at Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Hong Kong/archive4 have been addressed, please consider withdrawing your objection. Thanks, Ta-Va-Tar (discuss–?) 12:14, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
Canadian heraldry FAC
I believe I have addressed your image concerns (though I did, also, express disappointment in the way you raised the concerns). Can you please comment on the FAC one way or the other? Thank you. → ROUX ₪ 22:35, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
History of the New York Jets
I've added fair use rationale, hopefully you can strike strike strike your oppose oppose oppose or tell me what else ought to be done. Many thanks.--Wehwalt (talk) 21:50, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
- I've eliminated those images entirely, so unless there's some problem with the other images (I doubt it, fan photos), I'd be grateful if you could strike the oppose.--Wehwalt (talk) 15:36, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
South Park (season 13)
Hey Fasach. I'm removed the infobox image from this article, in part based on other comments on the FAC that agreed with your position. Although I'm sure you haven't reviewed the rest of the article to the point that you'd be ready or willing to support the nomination, I was hoping you could strike your oppose vote, since the issue you raised has now been resolved. Thanks! — Hunter Kahn 01:45, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Featured_article_candidates/José_Paranhos,_Viscount_of_Rio_Branco/archive1
I have queried your oppose on this article, and would appreciate a response bedore you delete this notice. Skinny87 (talk) 19:03, 17 November 2010 (UTC)