Misplaced Pages

User talk:Fasach Nua: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:03, 17 November 2010 editSkinny87 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers11,297 edits →Misplaced Pages:Featured_article_candidates/José_Paranhos,_Viscount_of_Rio_Branco/archive1: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 19:05, 17 November 2010 edit undoSkinny87 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers11,297 edits →Misplaced Pages:Featured_article_candidates/José_Paranhos,_Viscount_of_Rio_Branco/archive1: - ce, and replyNext edit →
Line 20: Line 20:
== Misplaced Pages:Featured_article_candidates/José_Paranhos,_Viscount_of_Rio_Branco/archive1 == == Misplaced Pages:Featured_article_candidates/José_Paranhos,_Viscount_of_Rio_Branco/archive1 ==


I have queried your oppose on this article, and would appreciate a response bedore you delete this notice. ] (]) 19:03, 17 November 2010 (UTC) I have queried your oppose on this article, and would appreciate a response before you delete this notice. ] (]) 19:03, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
:Thank-you, but I have no intention of doing so. Your behvaiour was rude to the point of violating ]. However, I would invite you to discuss this matter further, either here or, more preferably, on the FAC page. The exact violation in WIAFA of including the template would be appreciated. Many thanks, ] (]) 19:05, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:05, 17 November 2010

!

Hong Kong FAC

Hello Fasach Nua, your concerns at Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Hong Kong/archive4 have been addressed, please consider withdrawing your objection. Thanks, Ta-Va-Tar (discuss–?) 12:14, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Canadian heraldry FAC

I believe I have addressed your image concerns (though I did, also, express disappointment in the way you raised the concerns). Can you please comment on the FAC one way or the other? Thank you. → ROUX ₪ 22:35, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

History of the New York Jets

I've added fair use rationale, hopefully you can strike strike strike your oppose oppose oppose or tell me what else ought to be done. Many thanks.--Wehwalt (talk) 21:50, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

I've eliminated those images entirely, so unless there's some problem with the other images (I doubt it, fan photos), I'd be grateful if you could strike the oppose.--Wehwalt (talk) 15:36, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

South Park (season 13)

Hey Fasach. I'm removed the infobox image from this article, in part based on other comments on the FAC that agreed with your position. Although I'm sure you haven't reviewed the rest of the article to the point that you'd be ready or willing to support the nomination, I was hoping you could strike your oppose vote, since the issue you raised has now been resolved. Thanks! — Hunter Kahn 01:45, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Featured_article_candidates/José_Paranhos,_Viscount_of_Rio_Branco/archive1

I have queried your oppose on this article, and would appreciate a response before you delete this notice. Skinny87 (talk) 19:03, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Thank-you, but I have no intention of doing so. Your behvaiour was rude to the point of violating WP:DICK. However, I would invite you to discuss this matter further, either here or, more preferably, on the FAC page. The exact violation in WIAFA of including the template would be appreciated. Many thanks, Skinny87 (talk) 19:05, 17 November 2010 (UTC)