Revision as of 18:54, 21 November 2010 edit83.79.133.15 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:38, 21 November 2010 edit undoFrancesco Malipiero (talk | contribs)2,133 edits →Simon Mayr's version (the 4th!)Next edit → | ||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
== Simon Mayr's version (the 4th!) == | == Simon Mayr's version (the 4th!) == | ||
There's also an opera by ], titled ], which is the forth operas with this subject matter. Should we add this too? ] (]) | There's also an opera by ], titled ], which is the forth operas with this subject matter. Should we add this too? ] (]) | ||
:In my opinion, none of these three operas should be mentioned in the lead section. If they are to be mentioned, it should be in the ''Background'' section, and even then only if there is a proven link with Beethoven (like the one by Paer). Regards. --] (]) 22:38, 21 November 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:38, 21 November 2010
Opera B‑class | |||||||
|
Overtures
Perhaps someone cleverer than I could mention that the alterations made to the beginning opera required overtures in different keys (from C to E if I recall correctly). Constan69 (talk) 08:58, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Connection to Eyes Wide Shut
This opera gets mentioned in the motion picture "Eyes Wide Shut" as the password for the high class New York City sex party that Tom Cruise attends midway through the film. As this was the last major work of Stanley Kubrick, a simple sentence regarding this in the article should do no harm. However, it was removed using a very uncivil edit summary. The proper thing would have been to discuss it here instead of calling it "total rubbish" (see WP:CIV). Is there a legitimate reason for keeping this out? -OberRanks (talk) 05:25, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Hmmm, might not need to worry about this after all since its listed on the disambig page. -OberRanks (talk) 05:29, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- I have no comment about the edit summary, however I have to agree with Viva-Verdi that Eyes Wide Shut shouldnt be placed in this opera's "see also" section. I do not see any connection whatsoever except for some small part of it - Jay (talk) 05:34, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, "Fidelio" has many things in common with Eyes Wide Shut. There are some essays out on the web but they're far from sources. The fact that the main character is saved by Leonore from a "chorus of judges" is one of them. That's very similar to when Bill is pulled out of the fire by that masked woman in the ballroom at the party. I think all that needs to be done here is to find a valid source from a school or a novelist or something that points out these similarities because "Fidelio" being included in the film isn't just an accident, especially since the opera shares the same themes of love and fidelity. TabascoMan77 (talk) 22:56, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
- ... It's a non-issue now, but no, those points would only belong on the EWS article - the movie has nothing to do with Beethoven's opera and the link is thin at best.HammerFilmFan (talk) 19:30, 20 October 2010 (UTC)HammerFilmFan
Yes, no connection and no longer really an issue since its already on the disambig page. I didnt realize that at first. -OberRanks (talk) 05:37, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Does someone have a problem with Klemperer's 1962 recording?
The entry for Klemperer's 1962 recording was deleted here and again here . Bizarre. --Kleinzach 06:49, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- Now another recording has been deleted, --Kleinzach 09:34, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Leonore's voice-type
Leonore is a role for soprano OR MEZZO. For instance, Christa Ludwig, Gabriela Beňačková, Gabriele Schnaut--extremely successful Leonores, all mezzos.
Simon Mayr's version (the 4th!)
There's also an opera by Simon Mayr, titled L'amor coniugale, which is the forth operas with this subject matter. Should we add this too? 83.79.133.15 (talk)
- In my opinion, none of these three operas should be mentioned in the lead section. If they are to be mentioned, it should be in the Background section, and even then only if there is a proven link with Beethoven (like the one by Paer). Regards. --Francesco Malipiero (talk) 22:38, 21 November 2010 (UTC)