| Revision as of 14:10, 14 December 2010 editWee Curry Monster (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers25,546 edits →Sockpuppetry case: ROTFLMAO← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:55, 15 December 2010 edit undoVassyana (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,130 edits →AE Courtesy Note: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 293: | Line 293: | ||
| :If I were you I'd be deeply offended that someone thought you were me. ] <small>]</small> 14:10, 14 December 2010 (UTC) | :If I were you I'd be deeply offended that someone thought you were me. ] <small>]</small> 14:10, 14 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
| == AE Courtesy Note == | |||
| * ] | |||
| This is a courtesy note to let you know that you have been mentioned by name at ] and a proposed user conduct solution has been posted. No action has been suggested against you. ] (]) 03:55, 15 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:55, 15 December 2010
 Archives |
Just to note: if you post something on my talk page, I'll carry on the conversation there (on my talk page) unless you ask me to put it somewhere else. Pfainuk talk
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LI (May 2010)
The May 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:33, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
List of nations
Please put List of nations on your watch list. I though it had been settled but Mat Lewis clearly does not a he waited a year and then changed the redirect. -- PBS (talk) 04:46, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
- Got it. Thanks. Pfainuk talk 10:03, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
Thank you!
Thank you for reverting personal attack on my talk page! — Zhernovoi (talk) 19:47, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
- No problem. Pfainuk talk 17:57, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Merge discussion for Misplaced Pages:WikiProject South America/Falkland Islands work group/Units
An article that you have been involved in editing, Misplaced Pages:WikiProject South America/Falkland Islands work group/Units, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going to the article and clicking on the (Discuss) link at the top of the article, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Martinvl (talk) 19:23, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Categories
I hope you don't mind my removing categories from a subpage of yours, as categories shouldn't populate such pages. Best, Verbal chat 17:02, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
- Fair enough - if they don't belong they don't belong. I've requested the page be speedied anyway because I'd forgotten I had it. Pfainuk talk 17:04, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LII (June 2010)
|
|
|
June's contest results plus the latest awards to our members |
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. | |
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:29, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:BCAFL team
Template:BCAFL team has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Pit-yacker (talk) 16:01, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
Falklands Units
What to do? The situation can't be allowed to continue where one editor is effectively vetoing everything unless he gets his way. Justin talk 18:37, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
- I think we have a fairly strong case for non-unanimous consensus here. Goodness knows we've tried to get his agreement. And it would be going by his word: he said he wouldn't contest WP:FALKLANDSUNITS if no-one else did - and notably, no-one else did. Also notably, he's only actually opposed on procedural grounds (that he doesn't think we'll keep up our end of the bargain) - not on grounds of substance (that there's something wrong with the proposal).
- If you agree with my feeling that there is actually non-unanimous consensus, then the next job is to start changing articles - which I don't mind starting on tomorrow. I figure on going down the importance scale, obviously excluding any that are clearly more connected to some other project.
- On the consistency rule, last time around I only applied it where we were actually using (say) distance and area in the same paragraph. The rule is, if a metric measure is "significantly inconsistent" with an imperial one, use imperial for both, and then continue using imperial for that context in the rest of the article (for internal consistency). In practice, this generally means that all land areas in an article go imperial if one of them happens to be in the same paragraph as a distance - and not much else. Pfainuk talk 21:08, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
- OK I have kinda suggested we just go ahead and ignore him, I can make a low key start as I have a lot of commitments at the moment. Would it not be better to work to the weekend. Justin talk 21:23, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
- Might be easier, yeah. Let's start at the weekend then. Pfainuk talk 06:19, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
- OK no worries, btw seen his latest love note? Justin talk 08:00, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah. He's run out of arguments, methinks. Pfainuk talk 18:36, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
Edit-summaries and WP:CIVILITY
Pfainuk, I really don't want to get entangled in this dispute, but the "cleaning up Michael's mess" summaries are likely to cause offence. Will you please moderate these messages? Tony (talk) 03:39, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
- If positions were reversed, would you say the same to Michael? Of course not. Please don't try and set yourself up as a neutral observer here - we all know you're not and it doesn't help anyone. Pfainuk talk 09:10, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
3RR
No I had no intention of edit warring but I wasn't prepared to allow a racist epithet to remain in that article. Justin talk 19:38, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
- Fair enough. Pfainuk talk 19:41, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIII (July 2010)
|
|
|
July's contest results, the latest awards to our members, plus an interview with Parsecboy |
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. | |
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:49, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
sovereign states sorting criteria
Sorry to bother here, but as you are a contributor to certain discussions at the List of sovereign states I would like to show you the recently compiled list of all proposals for sorting criteria so that you can express your opinion here. Thanks! Alinor (talk) 13:29, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
3RR?
hi Pfainuk,
thank you for warning, but read here. --Keysanger 15:56, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIV (August 2010)
|
|
A recap of the month's new Featured and A-Class articles, including a new featured sound |
Our newest A-class medal recipients and this August's top contestants |
|
|
To change your delivery options for this newsletter please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:39, 7 September 2010 (UTC) | |
The Milhist election has started!
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.
With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team, Roger Davies 19:30, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Your image you created was promoted to VAlued picture
 |
POV Pusher?
I would appreciate an explanation for this accusation. I also recommend you discuss this in the Talk Page instead of reverting a referenced edition. JCRB (talk) 09:32, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Simple. You do nothing on Misplaced Pages but push a pro-Spanish and apparently now a pro-Argentine POV. You are a POV pusher. Pfainuk talk 17:06, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
Notification
A proposal to change the layout and sorting criteria of the article List of sovereign states has been finalised and submitted for consensus.
As you were previously involved in the discussion for this change, I thought I would inform you of the final proposal. Please provide comments here. Nightw 13:19, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
RFM
I've opened up a WP:RFM for List of sovereign states at Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/List of sovereign states. Please indicate whether you agree or don't agree to mediation there. TDL (talk) 00:40, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
Request for mediation of List of sovereign states
| A request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to List of sovereign states was recently filed. As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. The process of mediation is entirely voluntary and focuses exclusively on the content issues over which there is disagreement. Please review the request page and the guide to mediation requests and then indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you would agree to participate. Discussion relating to the mediation request welcome at the case talk page.
Thank you, AGK 21:50, 20 October 2010 (UTC) |
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LV (September 2010)
|
The results of September's coordinator elections, plus ongoing project discussions and proposals |
|
|
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 20:20, 23 October 2010 (UTC) | |
AN/I
Thanks for the heads up but for information I'm avoiding the article for the moment. Kind of a lame dispute, when a cool calm discussion could easily have resolved it. Justin talk 23:28, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
- Fair enough. Pfainuk talk 23:31, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
ARBCOM
- Please see this addendum placed on the talk page. I want to make sure everyone sees and is aware of it. JodyB talk 14:30, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LVI, October 2010
|
List of countries by population - Sovereign states or countries?
Hello, I've started a discussion on List of countries by population (talk page) that I thought you might be interested in joining. Thanks. Zarcadia (talk) 18:34, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
neologism
Hi Pfainuk,
There is an interesting discussion in Talk:Falklands_War#Malvinist? and I would like to know your opinion about. --Keysanger 20:11, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
Name Change & Territorial Waters
For info, changed it because I was fed up with prats making stupid jokes. Found an interesting article on the legality in International Law of Spain denying territorial waters to Gibraltar. The guys blog is here , you speak a little Spanish don't you? Very interesting reading. Wee Curry Monster talk 22:14, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010
|
List of states with limited recognition at FLRC
I have nominated List of states with limited recognition for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Nightw 15:33, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
Sock?
You don't think this could be Vintagekits or Alex do you? Maybe I'm getting paranoid? Wee Curry Monster talk 22:28, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
- Forget it, the contribution history is not comparable. Put it down to paranoia. Wee Curry Monster talk 22:30, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
|
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Pfainuk for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. — HelloAnnyong 13:49, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- If I were you I'd be deeply offended that someone thought you were me. Wee Curry Monster talk 14:10, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
AE Courtesy Note
This is a courtesy note to let you know that you have been mentioned by name at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Result concerning Wee Curry Monster and a proposed user conduct solution has been posted. No action has been suggested against you. Vassyana (talk) 03:55, 15 December 2010 (UTC)