| Revision as of 00:24, 14 December 2010 editBenkta (talk | contribs)4 edits →Waterboarding← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:24, 15 December 2010 edit undoVassyana (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,130 edits →Blocked: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| :It was a request for comment, and I added a relevant comment. The (mis)behavior of editors who are keeping the article from developing is relevant to the conversation, as is the form of the article and evaluations of the sources used to justify claims. I'd believe in your sincerity more if you as loudly decried the largest assumption of bad faith, that I'm someone's sockpuppet, or equally scrutinised clearer incivilities / personal attacks / non-constructive comments such as and . Or if you hadn't called me POV-pusher. ] (]) 00:24, 14 December 2010 (UTC) | :It was a request for comment, and I added a relevant comment. The (mis)behavior of editors who are keeping the article from developing is relevant to the conversation, as is the form of the article and evaluations of the sources used to justify claims. I'd believe in your sincerity more if you as loudly decried the largest assumption of bad faith, that I'm someone's sockpuppet, or equally scrutinised clearer incivilities / personal attacks / non-constructive comments such as and . Or if you hadn't called me POV-pusher. ] (]) 00:24, 14 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
| == Blocked == | |||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' '''indefinitely''' from editing for '''operating a single purpose, disruptive account'''. It is clear that '''this account's purpose is '''. Indefinitely blocked on that basis. If you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}} below this notice, but you should read the ] first. </div><!-- Template:uw-block --><!-- Template:uw-blockindef --> | |||
Revision as of 18:24, 15 December 2010
Arbitration Enforcement
See WP:AE for the section I've started about your editing at Talk:Waterboarding. Jehochman 19:15, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
Waterboarding
Please read Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Waterboarding#Remedies. If you persist in conduct at Waterboarding and/or Talk:Waterboarding that is deemed to be uncivil, a personal attack or an assumption of bad faith directed at another editor, then you you may be blocked from editing at the discretion of any uninvolved administrator. Please comment on the issues on the talk page and not on other editors. Thank you, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:53, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
- It was a request for comment, and I added a relevant comment. The (mis)behavior of editors who are keeping the article from developing is relevant to the conversation, as is the form of the article and evaluations of the sources used to justify claims. I'd believe in your sincerity more if you as loudly decried the largest assumption of bad faith, that I'm someone's sockpuppet, or equally scrutinised clearer incivilities / personal attacks / non-constructive comments such as and . Or if you hadn't called me POV-pusher. Benkta (talk) 00:24, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Blocked
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.