Talk:Carl Hewitt: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 02:35, 12 January 2011 editCalamitybrook (talk \| contribs)6,053 edits →Erdős number in introduction: Can talk page function?← Previous edit		Revision as of 05:26, 12 January 2011 edit undoArthur Rubin (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers130,168 edits →Does this "talk page" actually work?: commentsNext edit →
Line 33:		Line 33:

	] (]) 02:35, 12 January 2011 (UTC)		] (]) 02:35, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

			:On the contrary, you did add BLP violations to this page. I think there ''might'' have been something to discuss after the BLP violations were removed, but the reviewing admin differs.
			:Also, there are not '''not''' lots of editors questioning contents. I would say there have been 3: two editors and the one who refuses to create an account, but happens to be at the university where Hewitt teaches. — ] ] 05:25, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:26, 12 January 2011

Skip to table of contents

Biography: Science and Academia Start‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.
	An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

This article was nominated for deletion on 8 June 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

Archive 1

Erdős number in introduction

Do others agree with me that having someone's Erdős number in the introduction is awkward? __meco (talk) 08:07, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

I agree. Maybe it should go in the bio section, with the names of those whose co-authorship earns him the number. On it's own it reads a bit like his shoe size, at least to someone unfamiliar with the term. Kevin (talk) 10:20, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Does this "talk page" actually work?

Is there a discussion permitted here about ANYTHING??? In particular regarding additional reliable sources which might be permitted for addition regarding article in question?

Apparently, listing sources for discussion on this page isn't permitted??

Given this apparent fact, WHAT CAN BE DISCUSSED HERE?

Nothing?

When I listed merely for discussion 5-6 reliable sources, including a few major newspapers, the material was deleted and this TALK PAGE was shut down for extended period....by a single editor who has "administrator" status.

....This despite lots of editors questioning contents........

Very problematic??

Calamitybrook (talk) 02:35, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

On the contrary, you did add BLP violations to this page. I think there might have been something to discuss after the BLP violations were removed, but the reviewing admin differs.

Also, there are not not lots of editors questioning contents. I would say there have been 3: two editors and the one who refuses to create an account, but happens to be at the university where Hewitt teaches. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 05:25, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Categories: