Revision as of 20:45, 12 January 2011 editCalamitybrook (talk | contribs)6,053 edits →Does this "talk page" actually work?: nature of my interest← Previous edit |
Revision as of 20:54, 12 January 2011 edit undoSlimVirgin (talk | contribs)172,064 edits not appropriate here per BLPNNext edit → |
Line 20: |
Line 20: |
|
Do others agree with me that having someone's Erdős number in the introduction is awkward? __] (]) 08:07, 20 August 2009 (UTC) |
|
Do others agree with me that having someone's Erdős number in the introduction is awkward? __] (]) 08:07, 20 August 2009 (UTC) |
|
:I agree. Maybe it should go in the bio section, with the names of those whose co-authorship earns him the number. On it's own it reads a bit like his shoe size, at least to someone unfamiliar with the term. ] (]) 10:20, 20 August 2009 (UTC) |
|
:I agree. Maybe it should go in the bio section, with the names of those whose co-authorship earns him the number. On it's own it reads a bit like his shoe size, at least to someone unfamiliar with the term. ] (]) 10:20, 20 August 2009 (UTC) |
|
==Does this "talk page" actually work?== |
|
|
:Is there a discussion permitted here about ANYTHING??? In particular regarding additional reliable sources which might be permitted for addition regarding article in question? |
|
|
|
|
|
:Apparently, listing sources for discussion on this page isn't permitted?? |
|
|
:Given this apparent fact, WHAT CAN BE DISCUSSED HERE? |
|
|
|
|
|
:Nothing? |
|
|
|
|
|
:When I listed merely ''for discussion'' 5-6 reliable sources, including a few major newspapers, the material was deleted and this TALK PAGE was shut down for extended period....by a single editor who has "administrator" status. |
|
|
....This despite lots of editors questioning contents........ |
|
|
:::Very problematic?? |
|
|
|
|
|
] (]) 02:35, 12 January 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:On the contrary, you did add BLP violations to this page. I think there ''might'' have been something to discuss after the BLP violations were removed, but the reviewing admin differs. |
|
|
:Also, there are '''not''' "lots of editors questioning contents". I would say there have been 3: two editors and the one who refuses to create an account, but happens to be at the university where Hewitt teaches. — ] ] 05:25, 12 January 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
:When I noted this page on a list of the supposed "Ten Wackiest Arguments on Misplaced Pages," I was drawn to it out of curiosity. |
|
|
So far, I've not been disappointed! |
|
|
|
|
|
:Perhaps you might try to explain yourself rather than making mere assertions. |
|
|
] (]) 20:44, 12 January 2011 (UTC) |
|