Misplaced Pages

Mark Bourrie: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:23, 23 February 2006 view sourceHistoryBA (talk | contribs)4,750 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 16:24, 23 February 2006 view source HistoryBA (talk | contribs)4,750 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
Mark Bourrie is a blogger, journalist and doctoral student at the University of Ottawa, in Ottawa, Canada. '''Mark Bourrie''' is a blogger, journalist and doctoral student at the University of Ottawa, in Ottawa, Canada.


He drew attention to his blog in 2006 for comments about former Liberal aide ]. After Kinsella threatened a law suit, Bourrie backed down and issued an unqualified apology on his site, which read as follows: "The manner in which my January 14, 2006 blog entry was worded made it seem that Mr. Kinsella had been a party to illegal conduct when this was clearly not the case. I apologize without reservation to Mr. Kinsella for that error on my part." He drew attention to his blog in 2006 for comments about former Liberal aide ]. After Kinsella threatened a law suit, Bourrie backed down and issued an unqualified apology on his site, which read as follows: "The manner in which my January 14, 2006 blog entry was worded made it seem that Mr. Kinsella had been a party to illegal conduct when this was clearly not the case. I apologize without reservation to Mr. Kinsella for that error on my part."


==External links==
*

Revision as of 16:24, 23 February 2006

Mark Bourrie is a blogger, journalist and doctoral student at the University of Ottawa, in Ottawa, Canada.

He drew attention to his blog in 2006 for comments about former Liberal aide Warren Kinsella. After Kinsella threatened a law suit, Bourrie backed down and issued an unqualified apology on his site, which read as follows: "The manner in which my January 14, 2006 blog entry was worded made it seem that Mr. Kinsella had been a party to illegal conduct when this was clearly not the case. I apologize without reservation to Mr. Kinsella for that error on my part."

External links