Misplaced Pages

Marshall Rothstein: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:01, 23 February 2006 editWikikris (talk | contribs)78 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 17:33, 23 February 2006 edit undoChabuk (talk | contribs)4,845 edits added jewish canadian category, expanded appt. to supreme court.Next edit →
Line 3: Line 3:
Born in ], he received a ] degree in 1962 and a ] degree in 1966 from the ]. He was called to Bar of Manitoba in 1966. He was made a ] in 1979. Born in ], he received a ] degree in 1962 and a ] degree in 1966 from the ]. He was called to Bar of Manitoba in 1966. He was made a ] in 1979.


He practiced law and was a Partner with the Winnipeg law firm of Aikins, MacAulay & Thorvaldson. From 1970 to 1992, he was a lecturer in transportation law at the University of Manitoba. In 1992, he was appointed to the Federal Court Trial Division, ex officio member of the Court of Appeal, and appointed to the ]. In 1999, he was appointed a Judge of the ], Appeal Division. He practiced law primarily in the fields of transportation and competition law and was a Partner with the Winnipeg law firm of Aikins, MacAulay & Thorvaldson. From 1970 to 1992, he was a lecturer in transportation law at the University of Manitoba. In 1992, he was appointed to the Federal Court Trial Division, ex officio member of the Court of Appeal, and appointed to the ]. In 1999, he was appointed a Judge of the ], Appeal Division.


Rothstein was one of three "short list" candidates recommended by the outgoing Liberal government to be appointed to the ] replacing the retired justice, ]. . ] ] ] has nominated him to the court. Rothstein was one of three "short list" candidates recommended by the outgoing Liberal government to be appointed to the ] replacing the retired justice, ] in early 2006. . ] ] ] has chosen Rothstein as his nomination to the top court, he will now undergo a public hearing in an 'ad-hoc committee of parlimentarians,' a new step in the judicial appointment process created by ] in consultation with constitutional law expert ]. Harper has made it clear that while the ad-hoc committee will be able to question the nominee, it does not have veto power and should refrain from asking questions about personal opinions on moral issues.


==References== ==References==
Line 15: Line 15:
] ]
] ]
]

Revision as of 17:33, 23 February 2006

Marshall E. Rothstein (born 1940) is a Canadian lawyer and judge.

Born in Winnipeg, Manitoba, he received a Bachelor of Commerce degree in 1962 and a Bachelor of Law degree in 1966 from the University of Manitoba. He was called to Bar of Manitoba in 1966. He was made a Queen's Counsel in 1979.

He practiced law primarily in the fields of transportation and competition law and was a Partner with the Winnipeg law firm of Aikins, MacAulay & Thorvaldson. From 1970 to 1992, he was a lecturer in transportation law at the University of Manitoba. In 1992, he was appointed to the Federal Court Trial Division, ex officio member of the Court of Appeal, and appointed to the Court Martial Appeal Court of Canada. In 1999, he was appointed a Judge of the Federal Court of Canada, Appeal Division.

Rothstein was one of three "short list" candidates recommended by the outgoing Liberal government to be appointed to the Supreme Court of Canada replacing the retired justice, John C. Major in early 2006. . Conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper has chosen Rothstein as his nomination to the top court, he will now undergo a public hearing in an 'ad-hoc committee of parlimentarians,' a new step in the judicial appointment process created by Stephen Harper in consultation with constitutional law expert Peter Hogg. Harper has made it clear that while the ad-hoc committee will be able to question the nominee, it does not have veto power and should refrain from asking questions about personal opinions on moral issues.

References

Categories: