| Revision as of 14:43, 24 February 2006 edit24.144.84.178 (talk) →Let's give the guy a chance to respond← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:44, 24 February 2006 edit undoJimbo Wales (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Founder14,538 edits claiming prior edit :-)Next edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| == Let's give the guy a chance to respond == | == Let's give the guy a chance to respond == | ||
| He's planning to email me something. He says that the article contains several errors which are upsetting to him and his family and there is updated information.--] 14: |
He's planning to email me something. He says that the article contains several errors which are upsetting to him and his family and there is updated information.--] 14:44, 24 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 14:44, 24 February 2006
Is the Travolta reference really necessary? The information can be accessed via the external links. I had originally left it out because it seems to me that an encyclopedia does not legitimately deal in scandal, especially if unsubstantiated. RivGuySC 04:37, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
Let's give the guy a chance to respond
He's planning to email me something. He says that the article contains several errors which are upsetting to him and his family and there is updated information.--Jimbo Wales 14:44, 24 February 2006 (UTC)