| Revision as of 14:44, 24 February 2006 editJimbo Wales (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Founder14,538 edits claiming prior edit :-)← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:33, 24 February 2006 edit undoRobertissimo (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,088 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| He's planning to email me something. He says that the article contains several errors which are upsetting to him and his family and there is updated information.--] 14:44, 24 February 2006 (UTC) | He's planning to email me something. He says that the article contains several errors which are upsetting to him and his family and there is updated information.--] 14:44, 24 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :But until then, and until any material submitted is referenced and thoroughly NPOVed, let's keep what's there already... ] 16:33, 24 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:33, 24 February 2006
Is the Travolta reference really necessary? The information can be accessed via the external links. I had originally left it out because it seems to me that an encyclopedia does not legitimately deal in scandal, especially if unsubstantiated. RivGuySC 04:37, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
Let's give the guy a chance to respond
He's planning to email me something. He says that the article contains several errors which are upsetting to him and his family and there is updated information.--Jimbo Wales 14:44, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
- But until then, and until any material submitted is referenced and thoroughly NPOVed, let's keep what's there already... Robertissimo 16:33, 24 February 2006 (UTC)