| Revision as of 16:33, 24 February 2006 editRobertissimo (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,088 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:01, 24 February 2006 edit undoJimbo Wales (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Founder14,538 edits →Let's give the guy a chance to respondNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| :But until then, and until any material submitted is referenced and thoroughly NPOVed, let's keep what's there already... ] 16:33, 24 February 2006 (UTC) | :But until then, and until any material submitted is referenced and thoroughly NPOVed, let's keep what's there already... ] 16:33, 24 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ::] is policy. I expect you to respect it.--] 23:01, 24 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:01, 24 February 2006
Is the Travolta reference really necessary? The information can be accessed via the external links. I had originally left it out because it seems to me that an encyclopedia does not legitimately deal in scandal, especially if unsubstantiated. RivGuySC 04:37, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
Let's give the guy a chance to respond
He's planning to email me something. He says that the article contains several errors which are upsetting to him and his family and there is updated information.--Jimbo Wales 14:44, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
- But until then, and until any material submitted is referenced and thoroughly NPOVed, let's keep what's there already... Robertissimo 16:33, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
- WP:OFFICE is policy. I expect you to respect it.--Jimbo Wales 23:01, 24 February 2006 (UTC)