| Revision as of 23:01, 24 February 2006 editJimbo Wales (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Founder14,542 edits →Let's give the guy a chance to respond← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:51, 24 February 2006 edit undoMakemi (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users16,806 edits user wasn't logged inNext edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| ::] is policy. I expect you to respect it.--] 23:01, 24 February 2006 (UTC) | ::] is policy. I expect you to respect it.--] 23:01, 24 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :::To be fair, when the WP:OFFICE was reverted, whoever did it was not logged in and it showed up as an IP edit, and I'm guessing that it was not your intention that random people be allowed to use that policy. ]<font color="green">]</font> 23:51, 24 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:51, 24 February 2006
Is the Travolta reference really necessary? The information can be accessed via the external links. I had originally left it out because it seems to me that an encyclopedia does not legitimately deal in scandal, especially if unsubstantiated. RivGuySC 04:37, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
Let's give the guy a chance to respond
He's planning to email me something. He says that the article contains several errors which are upsetting to him and his family and there is updated information.--Jimbo Wales 14:44, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
- But until then, and until any material submitted is referenced and thoroughly NPOVed, let's keep what's there already... Robertissimo 16:33, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
- WP:OFFICE is policy. I expect you to respect it.--Jimbo Wales 23:01, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
- To be fair, when the WP:OFFICE was reverted, whoever did it was not logged in and it showed up as an IP edit, and I'm guessing that it was not your intention that random people be allowed to use that policy. Makemi 23:51, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
- WP:OFFICE is policy. I expect you to respect it.--Jimbo Wales 23:01, 24 February 2006 (UTC)