Misplaced Pages

:Requests for comment/User conduct: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:54, 27 February 2006 editRobert McClenon (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers197,511 edits General user conduct: delete badly formatted non-notified RfC and comment about it← Previous edit Revision as of 22:51, 27 February 2006 edit undoJYolkowski (talk | contribs)13,565 edits Use of administrator privileges: +Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Ta bu shi da yu 2Next edit →
Line 71: Line 71:


'''Approved pages - have met the two person threshold''' '''Approved pages - have met the two person threshold'''
*] &ndash; out-of-process deletions of images that were tagged as "fair use" but believed not to be. 22:51, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
*] &ndash; Both admins were involved in a mass speedy deletion of userboxes this past weekend, and it appears they have only added fuel to the fire. *] &ndash; Both admins were involved in a mass speedy deletion of userboxes this past weekend, and it appears they have only added fuel to the fire.
*] - regarding attitude towards new contributors unfamiliar with Misplaced Pages. ] (] | ] | ]) 20:22, 9 January 2006 (UTC) *] - regarding attitude towards new contributors unfamiliar with Misplaced Pages. ] (] | ] | ]) 20:22, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:51, 27 February 2006

Shortcut
  • ]

Comment about individual users

This section is for discussing specific users who have allegedly violated Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines. In order to request comment about a user, please follow the instructions to create a subpage in the appropriate section below. Disputes over the writing of articles, including disputes over how best to follow the NPOV policy, belong in the Article content disputes section above.

Deleting uncertified user RfCs

Requests for comment which do not meet the minimum requirements after 48 hours from creation are considered "uncertified" and will be de-listed. See Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment#User-conduct RfC for the minimum requirements. The subject RFC page will also be deleted, unless the subject has explicitly requested it to be retained.

Archives

Old discussions are kept in Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/User conduct disputes archive.

General user conduct

Discussions about user conduct should be listed in this section unless the complaint is specifically about the use of admin privileges or the choice of username. To list a user conduct dispute, please create a subpage using Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Example user as a template, and then list it as follows:

  • Example user – {one or two short sentences giving the dry facts} ~~~~~

Candidate pages - still need to meet the two person threshold
List newer entries on top

Approved pages - have met the two person threshold
List newer entries on top

But he persists with the attacks in the talk pages (most of this has been archived) and in his edit summaries. Please help. Nrets 04:33, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

Use of administrator privileges

This section is only for discussions specifically related to the use of sysop rights by Misplaced Pages:Administrators. This includes the actions of protecting or unprotecting pages, deleting or undeleting pages, and blocking or unblocking users. If the dispute is over an admin's actions as an editor, it should be listed under the General user conduct section above. To list a dispute, create a subpage using the following sample as a template:

As with disputes over general user conduct, at least two people must certify that they believe there is a legitimate basis for the complaint. If the listing is not certified within 48 hours of listing, it will be deleted.

Candidate pages - still need to meet the two person threshold

Pages where the target of the RFC has voluntarily waived the requirement of a two person threshold

Approved pages - have met the two person threshold

List newer entries on top

Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/User conduct: Difference between revisions Add topic