Misplaced Pages

:Requests for comment/User conduct: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:51, 27 February 2006 editJYolkowski (talk | contribs)13,565 edits Use of administrator privileges: +Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Ta bu shi da yu 2← Previous edit Revision as of 00:15, 28 February 2006 edit undoRenamedUser jaskldjslak904 (talk | contribs)24,239 edits Removing and archiving older RFCs that haven't been edited for over a monthNext edit →
Line 47: Line 47:
*] Gaming the system (]), assuming bad faith(]), incivil behavior (]), harassment (]), ignores consensus (]), and engages in personal attacks (]). *] Gaming the system (]), assuming bad faith(]), incivil behavior (]), harassment (]), ignores consensus (]), and engages in personal attacks (]).
*] Repeated personal attacks, refusal to change course *] Repeated personal attacks, refusal to change course
*] Legal threats, incivil behavior, etc. relating to pushing unverified and potentially libelous allegations that ] committed sex crimes with his daughter, and then conspired with his company to cover it up.
*] - User is engaged in heated discussion on the ] page. User is currently under probation for China/Taiwan related infractions. Article ends up protected.
*] - User continues to post irrelevent entries into articles (He recently lised a Toledo, Ohio station under stations in Kansas City) and creates articles with little or no content. All articles in question pertain to radio stations in the Midwest. He's been warned and banned for vandalism in the past and probably needs some mentoring... and grammar lessons. 04:08, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
*]. User has violated numerous Misplaced Pages policies in an effort to keep legitimate criticism of veganism out of the ] and ] articles.19:12, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
* ]. ], ], ], ], ]. Besides the edit war, massive disruption of place names, thousands of moves and edits per day, immediate concern. Already tried 3rd party. ] 03:10, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
* ] &ndash; strongly biased contributions that lead to strong personal discussions. ] ] 20:01, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
* ] &ndash; repeated POV deletion of perfectly relevant links to a site he doesn't like, coupled with accusations of "linkspamming."" Deceptive editing, accusations of "coordinating attacks" from third party sites, general harrassment of me, ]. ] 05:21, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
* ] &ndash; NPoV twisting, coordinating attacks on wikipedia PoV from third party site, link spamming fisheaters.com site written by Used2BAnonymous. 00:20, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
* ]. ], ], ], ], ]. Constantly argumentative, enjoys edit warring, refuses to take responsibility for statements made, combative and insulting. -- ] 00:06, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
* ] NPOV policy, hateful and libellous edits, ] and (minor) vandalism. --] 15:34, 13 December 2005 (UTC)


=== Use of administrator privileges === === Use of administrator privileges ===
Line 66: Line 56:


'''Candidate pages - still need to meet the two person threshold''' '''Candidate pages - still need to meet the two person threshold'''

'''Pages where the target of the RFC has voluntarily waived the requirement of a two person threshold'''
*] - actions over block duration of {{user|Marsden}}.


'''Approved pages - have met the two person threshold''' '''Approved pages - have met the two person threshold'''

Revision as of 00:15, 28 February 2006

Shortcut
  • ]

Comment about individual users

This section is for discussing specific users who have allegedly violated Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines. In order to request comment about a user, please follow the instructions to create a subpage in the appropriate section below. Disputes over the writing of articles, including disputes over how best to follow the NPOV policy, belong in the Article content disputes section above.

Deleting uncertified user RfCs

Requests for comment which do not meet the minimum requirements after 48 hours from creation are considered "uncertified" and will be de-listed. See Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment#User-conduct RfC for the minimum requirements. The subject RFC page will also be deleted, unless the subject has explicitly requested it to be retained.

Archives

Old discussions are kept in Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/User conduct disputes archive.

General user conduct

Discussions about user conduct should be listed in this section unless the complaint is specifically about the use of admin privileges or the choice of username. To list a user conduct dispute, please create a subpage using Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Example user as a template, and then list it as follows:

  • Example user – {one or two short sentences giving the dry facts} ~~~~~

Candidate pages - still need to meet the two person threshold
List newer entries on top

Approved pages - have met the two person threshold
List newer entries on top

But he persists with the attacks in the talk pages (most of this has been archived) and in his edit summaries. Please help. Nrets 04:33, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

Use of administrator privileges

This section is only for discussions specifically related to the use of sysop rights by Misplaced Pages:Administrators. This includes the actions of protecting or unprotecting pages, deleting or undeleting pages, and blocking or unblocking users. If the dispute is over an admin's actions as an editor, it should be listed under the General user conduct section above. To list a dispute, create a subpage using the following sample as a template:

As with disputes over general user conduct, at least two people must certify that they believe there is a legitimate basis for the complaint. If the listing is not certified within 48 hours of listing, it will be deleted.

Candidate pages - still need to meet the two person threshold

Approved pages - have met the two person threshold

List newer entries on top