Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/History of Maryland Route 200: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:49, 14 March 2011 editDough4872 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers139,375 edits Created page with '{{subst:afd2|pg=History of Maryland Route 200|cat=|text=Do not need separate article on history of route. Like the opposition article, the information can be conden...'  Revision as of 00:53, 15 March 2011 edit undoKumioko (renamed) (talk | contribs)318,300 edits History of Maryland Route 200: KeepNext edit →
Line 5: Line 5:
:({{Find sources|History of Maryland Route 200}}) :({{Find sources|History of Maryland Route 200}})
Do not need separate article on history of route. Like the opposition article, the information can be condensed and covered in a section of the ] article. <span style="background:#604007; padding:2px">''']]]'''</span> 23:49, 14 March 2011 (UTC) Do not need separate article on history of route. Like the opposition article, the information can be condensed and covered in a section of the ] article. <span style="background:#604007; padding:2px">''']]]'''</span> 23:49, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
'''Keep''' - Although the 2 articles could be merged having a separate article relating to the history of the Road is ok as long as there is sufficient information and sources to do so and there seems to be plenty here. --] (]) 00:53, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:53, 15 March 2011

History of Maryland Route 200

History of Maryland Route 200 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Do not need separate article on history of route. Like the opposition article, the information can be condensed and covered in a section of the Maryland Route 200 article. Dough4872 23:49, 14 March 2011 (UTC) Keep - Although the 2 articles could be merged having a separate article relating to the history of the Road is ok as long as there is sufficient information and sources to do so and there seems to be plenty here. --Kumioko (talk) 00:53, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Categories: