| Revision as of 00:53, 15 March 2011 editKumioko (renamed) (talk | contribs)318,300 edits →History of Maryland Route 200: Keep← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:09, 15 March 2011 edit undoRschen7754 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users123,234 edits →History of Maryland Route 200Next edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| :({{Find sources|History of Maryland Route 200}}) | :({{Find sources|History of Maryland Route 200}}) | ||
| Do not need separate article on history of route. Like the opposition article, the information can be condensed and covered in a section of the ] article. <span style="background:#604007; padding:2px">''']]]'''</span> 23:49, 14 March 2011 (UTC) | Do not need separate article on history of route. Like the opposition article, the information can be condensed and covered in a section of the ] article. <span style="background:#604007; padding:2px">''']]]'''</span> 23:49, 14 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
| '''Keep''' - Although the 2 articles could be merged having a separate article relating to the history of the Road is ok as long as there is sufficient information and sources to do so and there seems to be plenty here. --] (]) 00:53, 15 March 2011 (UTC) | '''Keep''' - Although the 2 articles could be merged having a separate article relating to the history of the Road is ok as long as there is sufficient information and sources to do so and there seems to be plenty here. --] (]) 00:53, 15 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Merge''' We don't need a separate history article for a state highway article. No other highway article in the U.S. has this. --''']]]''' 01:09, 15 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:09, 15 March 2011
History of Maryland Route 200
- History of Maryland Route 200 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Do not need separate article on history of route. Like the opposition article, the information can be condensed and covered in a section of the Maryland Route 200 article. Dough4872 23:49, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Keep - Although the 2 articles could be merged having a separate article relating to the history of the Road is ok as long as there is sufficient information and sources to do so and there seems to be plenty here. --Kumioko (talk) 00:53, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
- Merge We don't need a separate history article for a state highway article. No other highway article in the U.S. has this. --Rschen7754 01:09, 15 March 2011 (UTC)