Misplaced Pages

User talk:Courcelles: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:37, 16 March 2011 editRyecatcher773 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,925 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 02:39, 16 March 2011 edit undoATren (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers6,279 edits SA: new sectionNext edit →
Line 69: Line 69:


The article has been vandalized by 'IP editors' a few times since the recent suspension was announced of the Buckeyes Coach. I'm requesting page protection for a month or two until this blows over (or dies down anyway). Thank you. ] (]) 01:37, 16 March 2011 (UTC) The article has been vandalized by 'IP editors' a few times since the recent suspension was announced of the Buckeyes Coach. I'm requesting page protection for a month or two until this blows over (or dies down anyway). Thank you. ] (]) 01:37, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

== SA ==

Would you please explain why SA's page does not deserve an indef blocked template? ] (]) 02:39, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:39, 16 March 2011

This page is archived by MiszaBot III 60 hours after the last timestamp. If your discussion was archived before it was complete, feel free to go retrieve it.
I have no real system of where to reply, the orange bar exists for a reason, after all. If you're here to leave a talkback notice, thank you, but by all the gods and saints please make sure it is timestamped.

New messages at the bottom, please. It is very, very easy to never see things that are put at the top, unless yours is the only message in the morning. Courcelles

Archiving icon
Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50
51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60
61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70
71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80
81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90
91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100
101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110
111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120
121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130
131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140
141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150
151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160



This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

sources

My Mistake.My apologies.The information is correct but i will find printed sources for it.It might take me a week or so to read through all the various gymnastics books and magazines.Thank you again for notifying me where the information was incorrectly sourced.Olymfacts (talk) 18:55, 14 March 2011 (UTC) olymfacts.

YGM

Hello, Courcelles. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

-- DQ (t) (e) 00:43, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Long-winded reply sent. Courcelles 02:56, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

American actors of Slovak descent error

Hi there, you closed Category:American actors of Slovak descent and upmerged it last month, but it seems that it was not actually deleted.--TM 01:32, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Look at Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2011 February 4, it was never actually nominated, either, despite the CFD tag making it into the article... The tag should be removed and it actually listed at CFD. Courcelles 01:40, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Oh, strange.--TM 02:01, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Your nomination subpage has been created

Your application to serve on the Audit Subcommittee has moved forward to the community consultation phase.

Please visit your nomination subpage to answer the standard questions and any additional questions that may be posed.

Feel free to let me know if you have any questions or concerns regarding this process.

xeno 00:21, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 March 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:49, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

FLC review, if you have time

If you have a few spare minutes, could you pop over to Misplaced Pages:Featured list candidates/Grammy Award for Best Rap/Sung Collaboration/archive1? I'm a bit anxious about whether it will have enough reviews. Thanks, Adabow (talk · contribs) 06:38, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Sure thing, I'll try to get to it today. Courcelles 07:37, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
Thanks a bunch! Adabow (talk · contribs) 07:42, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Faisal4pro

Hi. I unblocked this account, as I shouldn't have listed them as a match. Sorry for the mix-up (and thanks for responding so quickly!). TNXMan 16:44, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Okay, there's my mess up for the month. I'll go and hide now. Courcelles 16:45, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
It's not your mess-up, it's mine. I'll take the fall for this one and you don't have to hide. By the way, good luck on the AUSC process! TNXMan 16:49, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Anne Hathaway

This just popped up on my watchlist, and I see that the IP has unsuccessfully attempted to add it twice. Is there some history behind this edit? Is it controversial for some reason? It appears to be properly sourced, but I haven't read each one. Please give me some info here. -- Brangifer (talk) 23:32, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Look further down the article, at 5.1 in the table of contents. The IP tried to remove that section, and, when reverted, decided to turn to actual disruption by adding a cut and paste of the section to the top of the article. Courcelles 23:35, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Jim Tressel

The article has been vandalized by 'IP editors' a few times since the recent suspension was announced of the Buckeyes Coach. I'm requesting page protection for a month or two until this blows over (or dies down anyway). Thank you. Ryecatcher773 (talk) 01:37, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

SA

Would you please explain why SA's page does not deserve an indef blocked template? ATren (talk) 02:39, 16 March 2011 (UTC)