Misplaced Pages

Template talk:Did you know: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:28, 17 March 2011 editRosiestep (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators304,191 edits Articles created/expanded on March 14: nom Alaska-Juneau Gold Mining Company← Previous edit Revision as of 03:46, 17 March 2011 edit undoPiotrus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers286,170 edits Turkish Union of XanthiNext edit →
Line 2,546: Line 2,546:
*{{DYKmake|Turkish Union of Xanthi|ZjarriRrethues}} *{{DYKmake|Turkish Union of Xanthi|ZjarriRrethues}}
--> -->
:*] All good, the hook could use more ilinks though. --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</span></sub> 03:46, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
:*<!--Make first comment here-->


====Three for the Road (TV series)==== ====Three for the Road (TV series)====

Revision as of 03:46, 17 March 2011

Template:DYK rules change

Did you know?
Introduction and rules
IntroductionWP:DYK
General discussionWT:DYK
GuidelinesWP:DYKCRIT
Reviewer instructionsWP:DYKRI
Nominations
Nominate an articleWP:DYKCNN
Awaiting approvalWP:DYKN
ApprovedWP:DYKNA
April 1 hooksWP:DYKAPRIL
Holding areaWP:SOHA
Preparation
Preps and queuesT:DYK/Q
Prepper instructionsWP:DYKPBI
Admin instructionsWP:DYKAI
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
History
StatisticsWP:DYKSTATS
Archived setsWP:DYKA
Just for fun
Monthly wrapsWP:DYKW
AwardsWP:DYKAWARDS
UserboxesWP:DYKUBX
Hall of FameWP:DYK/HoF
List of users ...
... by nominationsWP:DYKNC
... by promotionsWP:DYKPC
Administrative
Scripts and botsWP:DYKSB
On the Main PageT:DYK
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
To ping the DYK admins{{DYK admins}}

This page is for nominations to appear in the "Did you know" section on the Main Page.

NOTE: This page might load very slowly with Internet Explorer. Regular contributors may like to try Opera, Firefox or Google Chrome instead.

Purge

Instructions

Using a DYK suggestion string (see below examples), list new suggestions in the candidate entries section below under the date the article was created or the expansion began (not the date you submit it here), with the newest dates at the bottom. Any user may nominate a DYK suggestion; self-nominations are permitted and encouraged. Thanks for participating and please remember to check back for comments on your nomination. Every approved hook will appear on the main page.

DYK criteria

Official criteria: DYK rules and additional guidelines
Unofficial Guide: Learning DYK

How to list a new nomination

For a simplified version of these instructions, see User:Rjanag/Quick DYK.
For a step-by-step guide to filling out the
{{NewDYKnom}} template, see Template:NewDYKnomination/guide.

Please use one of the strings below to post your DYK nomination, using the "author" and "nominator" fields to identify the users who should receive credit for their contributions if the hook is featured on the main page.

  1. Nom without image: {{subst:NewDYKnom | article= | hook=... that ? | author= }}
  2. Nom with image: {{subst:NewDYKnom | article= | hook=... that ? | author= | image= | caption= }}
    To include more than one new or expanded article in a single hook: |article2= |article3= |article4= | (etc)
    To include more than one author: |author2= |author3= | (etc)
    To include alternate hooks: |ALT1= |ALT2= | (etc)
    To add a comment: |comment=
    To add the article you reviewed: |reviewed=

Do not wikilink the article title, or the author username field; the template will wikilink them automatically. Do wikilink the article title in the hook field, however.
Do not add a section heading if you are using the template; the template will add one for you.
Do not include a signature (~~~~) after the template.
Do not use non-free images in your hook suggestion.

An example of how to use the template is given below. Don't forget to fill out the rollover text, so people know what the image is of! Full details are at {{NewDYKnom}}:

{{subst:NewDYKnom
 | article      = Example
 | status       = new<!--(or)  expanded (or) BLP expanded-->
 | hook         = ... that this ] is an  ''']''' ''(pictured)''?
 | author       = User1
 | nominator    = User2
 | image        = Example.png
 | rollover     = An example image
 | alttext      = Description of the image
 | comment      =
 | reviewed     = Article you reviewed
 | revieweddiff = diff link to the article review
}}
  • Note that you should only use one of the above templates for the original hook. If you want to suggest a second, alternative hook for the same article submission, just type it in manually. The above templates output useful code for each submission and if you employ them for alternative hooks, you will mess up the page formatting.
  • When saving your suggestion, please add the name of the suggested article to your edit summary.
  • Please check back for comments on your nomination. Responding to reasonable objections will help ensure that your article is listed.
  • If you nominate someone else's article, you can use {{subst:DYKNom}} to notify them. Usage: {{subst:DYKNom|Article name}}

How to review a nomination

Any editor who was not involved in writing/expanding or nominating an article may review it by checking to see that the article meets all the DYK criteria (long enough, new enough, no serious editorial or content issues) and the hook is cited. Editors may also alter the suggested hook to improve it, suggest new hooks, or even lend a hand and make edits to the article which the hook applies so that the hook is supported and accurate. For a more detailed discussion of the DYK rules and review process see the additional rules.

If you want to confirm that an article is ready to be placed on a later update, or note that there is an issue with the article or hook, please use the following symbols to point the issues out:

Symbol Code DYK Ready? Description
{{subst:DYKtick}} Yes No problems, ready for DYK
{{subst:DYKtickAGF}} Yes Article is ready for DYK, with a foreign-language or offline hook reference accepted in good faith
{{subst:DYK?}} Query DYK eligibility requires that an issue be addressed. Notify nominator with {{subst:DYKproblem|Article}}
{{subst:DYK?no}} Maybe DYK eligibility requires additional work. Notify nominator with {{subst:DYKproblem|Article}}
{{subst:DYKno}} No Article is either completely ineligible, or else requires considerable work before becoming eligible

Please consider using {{subst:DYKproblem|Article|header=yes|sig=yes}} on the nominator's talk page, in case they do not notice that there is an issue.

Backlogged?

This page is often backlogged. As long as your submission is still on the page, it will stay there until an editor reviews it. Since editors are encouraged to review the oldest submissions first (so that those hooks don't grow stale), it may take several days until your submission is reviewed. In the meantime, please consider reviewing another submission (not your own) to help reduce the backlog (see instructions above).

Where is my hook?

If you can't find the hook you submitted to this page, in most cases it means your article has been approved and is in the queue for display on the main page. You can check whether your hook has been moved to the queue by reviewing the queue listings.

If your hook is not in the queue or already on the main page, it has probably been deleted. Deletion occurs if the hook is more than about eight days old and has unresolved issues for which any discussion has gone stale. If you think your hook has been unfairly deleted, you can query its deletion on the discussion page, but as a general rule deleted hooks will only be restored in exceptional circumstances.

Nominations

Older nominations

Articles created/expanded on March 4

Portingbury Hills, Leper Stone

Created by Paul Bedson (talk). Nominated by PFHLai (talk) at 19:27, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

  • Hook length and dates check out. Offline source accepted in good faith (google books serves as a courtesy link). I made a small edit to move what was clearly the citation closer to the article's hook statement, for DYK purposes, and will do a bit of cleanup on the source. —WFC20:44, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
  • The aforementioned reformatting has now been done for both articles. —WFC20:52, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
The rhumb line is fringe speculation, on a par with mapping the pyramids to Orion's belt and suchlike. See page 11 here for all the local conservationists have to say about it: The large boulder known as the Leper Stone at the edge of the village is rumoured to have been a standing-stone but there is no evidence to support this. - 2/0 (cont.) 20:14, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
  • Downgraded DYK recommendation. Material has been removed which would take this slightly below DYK length. I'm unsure whether it constitutes fringe speculation to the extent that it should not be in the article at all (what was source 8 has sown doubt in my mind, and I'm not an expert), but the hook as it stands would be inappropriate regardless. —WFC20:42, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
Comment Apologies if this is inappropriate, but we have these, Wandlebury Enigma, and Astronomical Complex, all mentioning the fringe writer Christian O'Brien. These are basically the same fringe claim put forward in various ways. Dougweller (talk) 19:05, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
The Leper Stone article is now ~300 characters too short, so here's a hook with just Portingbury Hills, with footnotes pending:
If the Portingbury Hills article is going to be similarly trimmed, it may not qualify for DYK. --PFHLai (talk) 00:02, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

1997 Central European flood

5x expanded by Piotrus (talk). Self nom at 02:47, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Reviewed Bushy Park Forest Reserve
  • Rule D2 says that every paragraph should have at least one citation. However, some articles which have met this criteria have still been rejected for sourcing concerns. TO NortyNort, if you feel that the claims made in this article require better referencing than by all means don't approve it.4meter4 (talk) 02:50, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
  • I believe this was the discussion you were both referring to, I was just reading it. The problem I had with the article didn't have to deal with the hook citation but various unreferenced 'stand-alone' sentences and short paragraphs; two in Damages section for example. That makes it hard to verify the information and check for any possible plagiarism. In addition, I think every paragraph or 'stand-alone' sentence should be cited within an article for DYK main-page preview and basic improvement. This part of the process is also the perfect time to catch the creating/expanding editor so the article doesn't end up lacking references and with one of those annoying 'references needed' tags. I like the hook and article but won't myself improve it with references lacking.--NortyNort (Holla) 03:05, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on March 5

Popular (Eric Saade song)

Created by --BabbaQ (talk) 22:45, 14 March 2011 (UTC).

Illinois Central Missouri River Bridge

Created by Freechild (talk). Nominated by PFHLai (talk) at 05:00, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, Yoninah. Yes, shorter is sweeter, but I'd suggest mentioning the river to give the hook a bit more geographical context. For ALT2 to get on MainPage, I think it'd be better if we can double-check with a more recent ref. It may not be 3rd anymore. BTW, the "Features" section has no footnotes, and I've already left a note on the author's usertalkpage about this. Hope this helps. --PFHLai (talk) 19:28, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on March 6

Big Jock Knew

  • ... that Rangers L.F.C. player, Lisa Swanson was forced to apologize and shut down her Twitter page after posting "Big Jock Knew" on it?
Alt: ... that the question, "What did Big Jock know?" if texted to 118 118, a directory enquiries service, in 2008, the answer received would be "It pertains to a matter that Stein knew but didn't report to the authorities." which refers to the song "Big Jock Knew"?

Created by The C of E (talk). Self nom at 21:39, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

  • • The article is classified as a stub, and rightfully so. It was 1507 characters, but after I fixed some wording that didn't make sense, it's now 1439. • The article refers to "Big Jock Knew" as a song, but as far as I could see, according to the refs, it's merely a chant or slogan. • I've struck the badly worded Alt, which, at 257 characters, is much too long. MANdARAX  XAЯAbИAM 18:33, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Well, I classed it as a song because of similar football fans chants are classed as songs. If you can think of another category it would go in, it would be much appreciated. As for the wording, I'll try to find a way to add in those 61 characters in a better written way. The C of E. God Save The Queen! (talk) 19:22, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Whether it's a "song" or not isn't really too important (although I'd personally prefer it be referred to as a "chant"). The article is now 1544 characters but it still feels like a stub to me. The rules say that "articles longer than 1,500 characters may still be rejected as too short". I have reservations about this appearing on the Main Page. Is the subject notable enough to have its own article, or should this just be a brief mention in the Jock Stein article? I'd like to get some other opinions. I'm fine with whatever others decide. MANdARAX  XAЯAbИAM 20:47, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
I'm aware it's a contraversial subject but it's the fact it's an issue that was mentioned in numerous sources that made me think it might be good to write about. The C of E. God Save The Queen! (talk) 21:46, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Well I think you'll find that it fulfills all the criteria at WP:GNG. The sources all come from newspapers with some of which go into detail. They are independent of the Rangers fans who came up with this song. Theres no unusable forum posts there from the potential bias of fans of the Old Firm. Therefore since it's recieved coverage from numerous sources, it seems to me eligable for it's own article and therefore suitable for DYK. The C of E. God Save The Queen! (talk) 10:32, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
It's not a one event thing. Seems notable enough to me. NativeForeigner /Contribs 02:40, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Jim Denomie

  • ... that Ojibwa artist Jim Denomie describes his unique painting style, which examines Native American & American culture, as metaphorical surrealism?

Created by Missvain (talk). Self nom at 18:25, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

  • This is good to go, I think (reference for hook on good faith--and it's non-controversial), but for one thing: the word "unique" in the hook. I think we typically don't have such adjectives unless they're direct quotes, and even then they need to be attributed. Would you settle for just cutting the word? Drmies (talk) 18:50, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Absolutely. That's a good point. I'm still new to writing DYK's and I notice I rewrite it a ton of times before I finally post it, obviously, I didn't do it enough ;-) Missvain (talk) 20:35, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
  • ALT1:... that Ojibwa artist Jim Denomie describes his painting style, which examines Native American & American culture, as metaphorical surrealism?
  • Missvain, you got an artist who has a governor sodomize an ox (or something like that?)--surely there's a more juicy hook in here than the name he gives his own style? Don't you have a third-party observation about one of these crazy works of art? I'm just wondering how many heads will turn at the mention of "metaphorical realism." I mention sodomy here (in bold, haha), and I'm sure I've tripled traffic to your article just from DYK checkers... Drmies (talk) 22:13, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Great point, I'm just not aware with how far we can push DYK. Feel free to write an alternate hook if you find something that "jumps" out at you :) Missvain (talk) 00:41, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
Just waiting for a green check mark on one of those... Missvain (talk) 15:29, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
Well, that's certainly a hook! Now, the source says, "Governor Pawlenty stands behind a blue ox (Pawl Bunyan) with his pants around his ankles". It's pretty clear from the painting (pictured in the reference) that he's giving it to the ox, no doubt--but I have to ask, especially since we're on some people's boundaries here, if that is good enough sourcing for the wording in this hook. I'm going to ask around, and hope that some editors will weigh in quickly. Drmies (talk) 15:30, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
OK, I got one response from a DYK regular, and it's negatory: the very fact needs to be sourced. With the reference given, you can retweak the hook (pants around the ankle), but we can't have the sodomy, unfortunately. Sorry, Drmies (talk) 16:15, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
Still waiting on a green check. Missvain (talk) 15:52, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
Missvain, I am waiting on others--I'm hesitant to approve this in this way and would like other editors to please weigh in. Drmies (talk) 18:32, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on March 7

Reza Abbasi

5x expanded by Johnbod (talk). Self nom at 14:54, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Reviewed KV Pharmaceutical Johnbod (talk) 15:03, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
  • The article has not been expanded 5x. It was formerly at 1084 characters and the expansion is now at 4851 characters, so you need a minimum of 569 additional characters to qualify for DYK. Keep in mind that the character count is for "readable prose", so it does not include section headers, references, footnotes, etc. Marrante (talk) 16:55, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Ok, can add more easily. Johnbod (talk) 18:12, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Now 5561 chars. Johnbod (talk) 21:40, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
This nom is improperly placed at March 7. Expansion began on March 4 and the nomination is dated March 14. It was my understanding that nominations were limited to articles from the previous 5 days, though I recently saw where there may be some wiggle room. This is 10 days, however, so that seems to me to be beyond the wiggle. The hook is online, but subscription required, so it has to be AGF. Being that I am only occasionally involved, I am leaving this one for others to decide. Marrante (talk) 23:16, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
It was nominated late (distracted by earthquake etc), but March 7th is the correct date I think, as that is when (I thought) it had reached 5x. The expansion did indeed begin on March 4 (22:34 UTC) but expansion noms are normally dated at the point they reach 5x. I don't see what the thinking is in moving it to March 6 (as has now been done), but whatever. Johnbod (talk) 02:06, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
Sorry, but that's not what it says here at the top of this page. It says "...list new suggestions in the candidate entries section below under the date the article was created or the expansion began..." This could not be more clearly written; the mistake is yours. The time frame is five days and "wiggle room" does not mean double the time frame.
You knew you were submitting it late even for the date you thought you came under. Surely you can't be asking to be rewarded for not reading the rules, too. That's a bit much, I think. Marrante (talk) 03:31, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Billingham Town F.C.

5x expanded by Doh5678 (talk). Self nom at 00:09, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

The Donald O'Connor Show

Created by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 05:51, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

ALT . . . on Christmas night 1954 the acclaimed Robert Mitchell Boy Choir performed on NBC's The Donald O'Connor Show?
Reviewed "Blue Dots" Billy Hathorn (talk) 22:53, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
Article as written is just 1545 characters but a full third of that is discussion of another, unrelated series. Further, this padding is sourced entirely to IMDb... and even then the URL in the reference is incorrect. - Dravecky (talk) 20:14, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
There are several other sources for The Donald O'Connor Show but they are nearly void of information.
ALT2 . . . that The Donald O'Connor Show, a 1954 NBC musical sitcom, is based on the premise of two young struggling songwriters seeking buyers for their compositions? Billy Hathorn (talk) 14:52, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on March 8

Wahl-Coates Elementary School

Created by PGPirate (talk). Self nom at 01:17, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

  • Long enough and new enough, but that hook isn't exactly scintillating, and the notability/sourcing of the article is a little iffy: all references seem to point to either Pitt County or East Carolina University. Jpatokal (talk) 10:41, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
I agree. I think it is a unique partnership, but I believe the phrasing is currently off. Any thoughts? Thanks, PGPirate 21:23, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
... that Wahl-Coates Elementary School is a partnership between Pitt County Schools and East Carolina University which began in 1914. Is this better?

St George's Church, Goltho

A small, simple brick church seen from the southwest in a churchyard, with a single bellcote at the west end

Created by Peter I. Vardy (talk). Self nom at 18:31, 8 March 2011 (UTC)


Mobilisa, Inc. v. Doe

  • ... that the Arizona Superior Court issued a subpoena to disclose the identity of the anonymous sender?

Created by Marmbrus (talk). Nominated by Foxiechick9 (talk) at 06:51, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

  • You started the article on 1 March and should thus list this nomination under that date. Technically, it's somewhat late, as articles should not be more than five days old when they get nominated, but given the shortage of hooks (which is somewhat improving, though), this may still be tolerated. You need to provide some wikilinks in the hook, and the target article should appear in bold. For future nominations, you might find it easier to use the nomination template, as it guides you through the process. In its current form, the article does not meet DYK requirements, as each paragraph needs to have at least one reference. Many paragraphs are unreferenced. Please add some relevant categories to the article; it currently has none. Once those issues are addressed, we can move onto checking the hook fact. Schwede66 11:21, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Wandlebury Enigma

Created by Paul Bedson (talk). Self nom at 04.30, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Length checks out and although the page was created more than 5 days ago, it qualifies on the basis of 5x expansion on March 9. The issue is that the ref quoted for the hook does not involve "archaeoastronomy" as far as I can make out. ► Philg88 ◄ 10:27, Friday March 11, 2011 (UTC) 10:27, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
Comment Thanks for the review! I've changed the hook to make it clearer that one of the Wandlebury Enigma theories was it's observational puprpose. Hope this clarifies. Paul Bedson (talk) 12:28, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
Comment Apologies again if this is inappropriate, but we have this, Leper Stone, Portingbury Hills, and Astronomical Complex, all mentioning the fringe writer Christian O'Brien. These are basically the same fringe claim put forward in various ways. Dougweller (talk) 19:09, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
Comment Not sure I understand the above, "it qualifies on the basis of 5x expansion on March 9." The page was created on March 2 and nominated on March 11, which is 9 days later and 4 days late. The fact that nothing was done on the article for nearly a week, I don't think means the article can suddenly be turned into a 5x expansion nom listed under March 8, although that's when the expansion began.
I don't know if there's a ruling on how long there should be between the previous edit and when an expansion is begun, but perhaps that needs to be established. What I do know is that this article was nominated as "new" and not as "expansion" and that it was nominated 9 days after it was created, which would make it an automatic reject. The fact that on March 9 it reached 5x expansion is meaningless, though if it had been entered on March 11 as an expanded article, the time element would be okay. I don't know if this sort of thing is accepted after the fact, though. The rules are listed here to be read and followed, not cast aside whenever someone fails to read them — or are the rules now there only for those who wish to abide by them?
According to the DYK instructions at the top of this page, 5x expansion noms qualify from the date the article was created or the expansion, not the date 5x expansion was reached. There seems to be a lot of confusion about this of late. On occasion, this time frame may be stretched to 8 days (as per Rule D9) but as it clearly states in the DYK Instructions at the top of this page, "list new suggestions in the candidate entries section below under the date the article was created or the expansion began (not the date you submit it here)". I won't put the rejection tick up here, though I think it rightfully belongs here. I'll leave that to someone who has more experience on DYK than I. Marrante (talk) 17:37, 16 March 2011 (UTC) (fixed a typo Marrante (talk) 17:39, 16 March 2011 (UTC))

Kfar Qoûq

Created by Paul Bedson (talk). Self nom at 04.30, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on March 9

Chapter 3 of the Syrian Constitution

Created by Zozo2kx (talk). Self nom at 00:26, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

  • The lead, which has no citations and different information, says the chapter has 19 articles but you cite Articles 131 and 143. This article needs to be fleshed out better to be readable.Thelmadatter (talk) 00:49, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
  • The lead does not provide any extraordinary facts (it's a count of the number of the articles in the chapter), and thus does not need citation. It certainly does not provide different information, as this article is about the 3rd chapter. The Syrian constitution numbers the articles continuously. The 3rd chapter contains articles from 131 to article 148. Yazan (talk) 00:53, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
The lead, if not cited, should provide a summary of the article that follows, which is why it would not need citation. There are facts presented in the lead, which are not in the article proper.Thelmadatter (talk) 16:30, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Romeo and Juliet: the tomb scene

Juliet with arm raised

Created by Andrew Dalby (talk), Victuallers (talk). Self nom at 23:41, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Date, length, sourcing, picture all look good to me, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:53, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Fennville High School

Created by Ashershow1 (talk). Self nom at 23:09, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

  • Sorry much too short. The article has 417 characters of pure referenced text. (We don't count quotes, titles, lists etc). If it quickly gains another 1100 characters of pure referenced text then it will be fine. The refs have to be 3rd party. ie we don't believe the schools site as it is considered biased. Hope that helps Victuallers (talk) 23:46, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Grave Circle A, Mycenae

Ruins of a Bronze Age Acropolis with Cyclopean structures, the main entrance is seen on the right and a burial site on the left.

Created/expanded by Alexikoua (talk). Self nom at 09:22, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Reviewed: José María Jesús Carbajal


Leslie R. Fairn

Created by Verne Equinox (talk). Self nom at 04:07, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

The Beaux Arts style is noted in Ref. No. 9; Modernist (or "modern") is noted in Ref. No. 12; The length of his career is given in Ref. No. 4 (it says 65 years, but arithmetic says it had to be at least 69 - his first work was completed in 1903 and I assume he must have designed it in 1902, and the last one in 1971. That works out to 69 years, which I rounded. I offer a modification below. Verne Equinox (talk) 00:51, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
ALT1 ... that Canadian architect Leslie R. Fairn, whose output ranged from Beaux Arts to Modernism, had a career lasting nearly 70 years?

; assuming it is long enough, with the article having lists. You might add references in paragraph one too. Billy Hathorn (talk) 02:55, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

  • I'm sorry, the information in the article is not sourced correctly. You can't write that he worked 70 years when the source you gave says 65 years. No source is given for his working "until his death". Can you find any other sources on Google or Google Books? Yoninah (talk) 09:27, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
I think I'm running out of time. I have an inquiry into a library, but perhaps this will do. It is still a pretty impressive record at 65 years:
ALT2 ... that Canadian architect Leslie R. Fairn, whose output ranged from Beaux Arts to Modernism, had a career lasting 65 years? Verne Equinox (talk) 22:42, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

St Andrew's Church, Gunton

A classical portico with four columns and the entrance to the church beyond

Created by Peter I. Vardy (talk). Self nom at 09:29, 10 March 2011 (UTC)


Bill Moe

5x expanded by Leech44 (talk). Self nom at 03:09, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Date, length, and sources check out. I wikilinked vertebrae btw. Nice work, Ruby2010 talk 04:33, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the review and the link. --Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 05:13, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

John Bell (mathematician)

Created by Asalmgren (talk). Nominated by Mono (talk) at 23:56, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Checks out Missvain (talk) 16:31, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Barbara Staff

Created by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 22:09, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Reviewed and edited Jimmy Lile
Neither article nor quoted source say "thrust" and article text says "Republican women's activities", not "conservative political activism". Also, we only have an interview quotation from Staff that the professor was a "radical liberal", not an more objective source such as a news report, so let me propose this alt hook:
ALT1: ... that Barbara Staff, a co-chairman of the 1976 campaign of Ronald Reagan in Texas, became a Republican activist in reaction to her political science professor? (NPOV, better linking, better matches to source and article) - Dravecky (talk) 09:52, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Bloodlands: Europe Between Stalin and Hitler

Created by Tentontunic (talk), Piotrus (talk). Nominated by Piotrus (talk) at 20:19, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

  • Some POV issues with this one. Possibly they are only minor, but I'm a little concerned that there is only one line of criticism of the book in the article. That may, of course, reflect the reviews, but then again, maybe not. So someone may need to do a little research on this. Gatoclass (talk) 06:38, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Abe Cohn

Created by Cbl62 (talk). Nominated by Nyttend (talk) at 15:27, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

  • Jewish basketball and football stars were unusual in the early 20th Century. I thought that was one of the most interesting tidbits, but I'll defer if others disagee. Cbl62 (talk) 01:47, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Lydia Cecilia Hill

Lydia Cecilia Hill (1913-1940)

Created by Storye book (talk). Self nom at 14:48, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

  • This is a very impressive article, first of all, and a fascinating story. But it needs some copyedits, mainly for punctuation, esp. in the references. As for the hook, I'd like to see "ordinary girl" replaced with something else. I'm not entirely sure that "ordinary girl" has an accepted and value-free definition, for instance. Drmies (talk) 22:41, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
  • It's basically a Cinderella story which ended in tragedy, but it's firmly based on English class issues of the 1930s; issues which have changed dramatically since that era. The problem is finding a phrase which would not be misunderstood outside the UK. A newspaper described her origins as "humble" but we can no longer say that, because it implies disrespect. She would probably have described herself as "working class", but again that has changed its meaning. We could perhaps describe her as a "commoner" like Kate Middleton, but Miss Hill's childhood was far less privileged than Miss Middleton's. I had hoped that "ordinary" would translate today as "not royal" and tacitly "not the courtesan-type". So how is "ordinary" being understood outside the UK?
  • ALT 1: ... that Lydia Cecilia Hill (pictured) was an English working-class girl who became a favourite of the Sultan of Johor?
  • I am not sure what you mean by the article needing a copyedit in the main text. I have checked through it and corrected a few minor issues, but cannot find anything that would affect DYK standards. All of the quotation marks are strictly necessary as they all indicate actual quotations which are cited. Without those quotation marks it would be plagiarism. Some of the quotations do contain syntax which we wouldn't use today, and some contain the spelling Johore with an "e" which was always used in the 1930s, but those things cannot be changed because they are quotations. So please could you kindly let us know what problems you have found in the main text. Regarding the citations, in edit mode we get a notice of "Category:Pages containing cite templates with deprecated parameters". I don't know what that means, but if someone could kindly tell me, I could then correct it. Thank you.--Storye book (talk) 23:34, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
  • In the US we like to pretend that class doesn't exist. How about pointing at her profession? "Dancer"? "A minor actress and cabaret dancer"? Drmies (talk) 02:31, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

The Avenue

The last rugby union league game of London Irish being played at the Avenue

  • ... that Spelthorne Liberal Democrats councillors opposed The Avenue redevelopment plan because they disagreed with the Conservative policy that 80% of the new homes needed either 1 or 2 bedrooms?

5x expanded by The C of E (talk). Self nom at 14:31, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

  • MickMacNee. Length, author & date fine. No major content issues except that the article could be improved with a proper layout and lede section, per the MoS. But the killer for the nom is the fact that the cite for the hook does not support the idea that the Lib Dems opposed the proposal (i.e. that a vote took place), it's just supporting the statement of their general opposition to the 80% policy. MickMacNee (talk) 21:08, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Well it's the fact that it was the only reason they opposed the plans was because of the 80% policy. Conidering that Spelthorne Council is basically controlled by the Conservatives shows that they have little way to legeslate against it but gives other groups another reason to oppose. I will see if I can get another hook... The C of E. God Save The Queen! (talk) 21:40, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Al Karama, United Arab Emirates

Created by Jpatokal (talk). Self nom at 10:44, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Very interesting! Not sure the hook is accurate though: the constitution was amended in 1996 according to the article. How about this hook?
Thanks for the review! The Article 9 of the current Constitution still exists in its original form, the amendment just overrides it separately. But, for clarity, I've changed my suggested hook to state "the original constitution".
If we go with your hook instead, I'd suggest saying "permanent capital" instead, since Abu Dhabi was the de jure capital, just a temporary one (Article 9.3). Jpatokal (talk) 23:36, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Parafilaria multipapillosa

  • ... that over 2,000 years ago two Chinese armies traveled 10,000 km to find "Heavenly Horses", the finest mounts then known, apparently infected with a tiny worm causing them to "sweat blood" from skin sores?

John Hill (talk). Self nom at 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Astronomical Complex

Created by Paul Bedson (talk). Self nom at 04.19, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Comment Apologies if this is inappropriate, but we have Portingbury Hills, Leper Stone above, and Wandlebury Enigma, and now this, all mentioning the fringe writer Christian O'Brien. Dougweller (talk) 19:03, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
Fringe is less of an issue then the merits of the article and hook (a DYK can be about a notable fringe theory, after all). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 20:31, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
  • After further expansion, the size checks out. Date is fine as well. A major problem, however, is still present with the hook and article itself, namely: 1) the hook is not supported by a reference, nor is in fact the article's main claim (definition of the term "astronomical complex"). The entire initial para/lead has one ref, to a book, without a page number). While I find the subject quite interesting, the article cannot be DYKed till a reliable reference is presented confirming that the term "astronomical complex" is used in a way that the hook (and the article) claims. In fact, if such a reference is not provided, I am afraid that the article could be deleted per WP:OR/WP:V. PS. Please don't get me wrong, I am sympathetic to the subject, and would like to see it properly referenced and DYKed. But for now, it has major problems. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 20:31, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
The best non-fringe definition of this term seems to come from Vilma Fialko defining Uaxactún as a commemorative astronomical complex in Spanish, I've given this as an alternative name. Hope that cuts the mustard and gives it distance from fringe claims. Paul Bedson (talk) 22:27, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
Could you provide quotations for this term use? Particularly from Fialko and Laporte? Also, can you add page numbers to your ref? You may find this tool useful. I'd suggest expanding the list of examples with the astronomical complex name, ex. Y in Z, called "Y Astronomical Complex". But I am seeing usage of the terms in some sources cited, this confirms the notability of the term, and its usage in this context. With I think this article is DYKable now. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 17:02, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Cool, thanks for the tool. Have edited the article to your suggestions and included America's Stonehenge as a prominent example of something commonly referred to as an Astronomical Complex along with examples of where the phrase has been used with others. Paul Bedson (talk) 23:15, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on March 10

Jennifer Aniston Goes Viral

Created by Black Falcon (talk). Self nom at 23:05, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Jens-Daniel Herzog

Created by Gerda Arendt (talk). Self nom at 21:34, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

RAF Northolt

5x expanded by Harrison49 (talk). Self nom at 21:27, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

  • Hook okay. The article does not appear to have been expanded fivefold. Readable prose expanded from 5,756 B (926 words) in September 2010 to 9,333 B (1,526 words) today. Sorry dude. Hawkeye7 (talk) 02:40, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

47 Ronin (film)

5x expanded by Erik (talk | contribs). Self nom at 15:17, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

  • All checks out, although had to hit reload on the source a couple of times to get it to load. Miyagawa (talk) 19:24, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
  • Hate to reject my own nomination, but I just learned of a rule that invalidates this nomination. This says, "F8: "a 'new' article is no more than five days old. This does not include articles split from older articles", although an article sufficiently expanded from a section of an older article can be a fivefold expansion. The word 'fork' is sometimes used to mean Misplaced Pages:Splitting." I had split the content from forty-seven Ronin to create the film article, which apparently does not count. Erik (talk | contribs) 00:30, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Geijera parviflora

small white flowers in sunlight

  • ... that the wilga is a valued fodder tree of rural Australia... although why sheep like some trees and not others is not known?

Created by Casliber (talk), Poyt448 (talk). Self nom at 14:38, 11 March 2011 (UTC)


Date and length are good- offline source accepted AGF. --E♴(talk) 00:48, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

José María Jesús Carbajal

Created by Maile66 (talk). Self nom at 14:09, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Hook, lenght and date seem to be ok. Fine to goAlexikoua (talk) 12:57, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Indianapolis (Parks and Recreation)

5x expanded by Hunter Kahn (talk). Self nom at 05:44, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Faye HeavyShield

Created by Missvain (talk). Self nom at 05:00, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Amalia Küssner Coudert

Created by Sweet kate (talk). Self nom at 01:39, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

I just modified the Google books link for the hook (ref 2) to go directly to the page referenced, so it should be more than AGF now. :) Sweet kate (talk) 14:31, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Gil Hibben

Created by Mike Searson (talk). Self nom at 19:29, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Icodextrin

5x expanded by Anypodetos (talk). Self nom at 19:21, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Central de Abasto, Mexico City

Created by Thelmadatter (talk). Self nom at 18:24, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Bloeme Evers-Emden

Created by Yoninah (talk). Self nom at 17:08, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Saigō-no-Tsubone

Saigō-no-Tsubone, or "Lady Saigo"

  • Comment: Fifth nomination

Created by Boneyard90 (talk). Self nom at 02:01, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

  • Length, hook, image OK. Offline line source AGF. The article appears to have been created on 6 March, and maybe should have been presented under that date; but, no matter, it is still within the rules re time. A nicely presented and referenced article. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 09:23, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
This article was moved out of userspace on 10 March. --69.157.47.208 (talk) 14:23, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Gleno Dam

A failed concrete structure that once impounded a lake, the right portion of it destroyed

  • ... that in 1923, the Gleno Dam (pictured) in Italy failed shortly after it was completed and its flooding killed at least 356 people?
  • Reviewed: Donal Henahan Reviewing: 1997 Central European flood, iPad2

Created/self-nom by NortyNort (Holla) 10:16, 10 March 2011 (UTC).

Out Of The Ordinary Festival

Created by Paul Bedson (talk). Self nom at 03.07, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Sounds like a cool festival, actually! All checks out. Missvain (talk) 04:59, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on March 11

Samuel Rayner

a room packed with paintings and curios

  • ... that Samuel Rayner who painted Derby's exhibition in 1839 (pictured) had exhibited a painting in the Royal Academy when only 15?

Created/expanded by Andrew Dalby (talk), Victuallers (talk). Self nom at 18:03, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

  • Length is ok and hook is interesting - but is not referenced in the article. Perhaps it is in one of the 3 references given, but they are not on-line so harder to check. In-line cite would be good. Tzu Zha Men (talk) 18:13, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
I have sharpened ref call outs - reliable sources are more important than on-line. ODNB is online if you have UK library ticket. The DNB is online but it is not so reliable. The other source is Goodey's Derby which is an academic book and reliable source. The DNBtickAGF template is designed for when the ref is not online. I reviewed Michael Walker, Baron Walker of Aldringham below. Victuallers (talk) 19:39, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
OK - looks good now and article is ready for DYK, with an offline hook reference accepted in good faith. Tzu Zha Men (talk) 22:38, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Michael Walker, Baron Walker of Aldringham

5x expanded by HJ Mitchell (talk). Self nom at 09:43, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

ref fine, checked for originality, well reffed, expansion OK, thank you Victuallers (talk) 19:34, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

George Corneal

Created by Cbl62 (talk). Self nom at 23:26, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

A good article on a notable individual, good sources which verify, ready to go. Leidseplein (talk) 02:05, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Eugen Relgis

Created by Dahn (talk). Self nom at 12:55, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Arthur Karpus

Photograph of University of Michigan athlete Arthur Karpus in 1918

Created by Cbl62 (talk). Self nom at 02:43, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

List of Olympic venues in sailing

Created by Miller17CU94 (talk). Self nom at 20:28, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

  • Comment English is not my first language, but there seems to me that the hook has a minor non sequitur: "the venue used is the only one to be held". Maybe some rephrasing is in order? Regards, Dahn (talk) 19:32, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
  • The grammar is fine, but the bit about the dead rats and refrigerators floating in the water would make a much better hook, IMO. Meanwhile, the prose section of the article is under 1500 characters. Yoninah (talk) 22:20, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Treaty of Serbian-Albanian Alliance

Created by Antidiskriminator (talk). Self nom at 20:15, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Enoch Steen

Snow on the eastern slope of Steens Mountain

Created by Orygun (talk). Self nom at 03:00, 12 March 2011 (UTC)


Mercado de Sonora

Items related to Santa Muerte and Santería

Created by Thelmadatter (talk). Self nom at 19:56, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

All Saints Church, Haugham

A slim ornate tower and spire seen between trees

Created by Peter I. Vardy (talk). Self nom at 17:52, 11 March 2011 (UTC)


Pavlovsk, Pushkin, Tsarskoye Selo Railways

Painting of an illuminated Victorian building at night with a crowd dancing in front of it

5x expanded by Materialscientist (talk). Self nom at 11:30, 11 March 2011 (UTC)


Dirk Gently (TV adaptation)

Created by Bob Castle (talk). Self nom at 11:22, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Władysław Marian Jakowicki

Created by Piotrus (talk). Self nom at 07:20, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Taiji Cave

Created by Philg88 (talk). Self nom at 10:50, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Er... It has inline citations and geocoordinates are not a requirement for DYK. ► Philg88 ◄ 20:49, Friday March 11, 2011 (UTC) 20:49, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
The last section does not have inline citations. No, geocoordinates are not necessary, which is why I said it would be nice.Thelmadatter (talk) 13:26, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
OK, references beefed up. They are all in Chinese but DYK allows WP:AGF for that. I've also added the coordinates. ► Philg88 ◄ 07:27, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
AGF on the foreign language sources. Length and Date are good. --E♴(talk) 22:47, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Xinfengjiang Dam

Created/self-nom by--NortyNort (Holla) 11:53, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Replaced 's with {{`s}} per rule C7. MANdARAX  XAЯAbИAM 18:44, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
  • Maybe it would scan better as:
... that while the Xinfengjiang Dam's reservoir in China was filling in 1962, there were several earthquakes nearby, including one registering 6.1 on the moment magnitude scale?
Does "reservoir" really need to be linked? ► Philg88 ◄ 21:09, Friday March 11, 2011 (UTC) 21:09, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
I don't think it does, pretty obvious. I like your alt, but do we need to spell out the pipe? I know it is different than Richter but I thought the piping sufficed. I saw similar use on earthquake articles including the recent one.--NortyNort (Holla) 02:32, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
(Embarrassed cough) I'd never heard of MMS until I read the article hence my suggestion - the media at least still seem to use Richter. Best ► Philg88 ◄ 06:24, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Scott Statue

A marble statue showing a man in polar clothing holding a rod, in front of trees.

A marble statue lying in front of its plinth with the legs broken.

Created by Schwede66 (talk). Self nom at 22:22, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

  • I got close enough yesterday to get a photo. That visually confirms the previously AGFed hook fact. Have also provided this new picture here, and an ALT1 hook. Schwede66 19:14, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Kawasaki Vulcan 750

Created by Andman8 (talk). Self nom at 23:51, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Balquhain

Balquhain Stone Circle

Created by Paul Bedson (talk). Self nom at 02.30, 12 March 2011 (UTC)


EyesOn Design

Created by CZmarlin (talk). Self nom at 20:18, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Current nominations

Articles created/expanded on March 12

SMS Friedrich Carl (1867)

Created by Parsecboy (talk). Self nom at 11:57, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

The Jo Stafford Show

Created by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 20:27, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Reviewed United States v. Lee
I added 7 years apart. Billy Hathorn (talk) 03:12, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Treaty of Niš (1923)

  • ... that on March 23, 1923, Bulgaria undertook the obligation to suppress the operations of the IMRO carried out against the Yugoslavia from the Bulgarian territory by signing the Treaty of Niš?

Created by Antidiskriminator (talk). Self nom at 22:51, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Sundevall's Roundleaf Bat

5x expanded by Anaxial (talk). Self nom at 09:20, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Citation is published on line but requires special log in, so I have accepted it 'in good faith'; size and expansion checked.
ALT? The article says that both genders have these teats, which would make for a more catchy hook. How about
... that both male and female Sundevall's Roundleaf Bats have a large pair of false teats? Geof Sheppard (talk) 14:02, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Ah... if the article implies that, I've not written it as well as I thought. They're only large in the females, so I'll reword it to make that clearer. Thanks for catching the ambiguity!Anaxial (talk) 16:28, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Osborne Cowles

5x expanded by Cbl62 (talk). Self nom at 00:26, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Billy Hathorn (talk) 20:36, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

William Perigo

Created by Cbl62 (talk). Self nom at 23:38, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

State v. Elliott

Created by Savidan (talk). Self nom at 19:59, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Draft-card burning

A crowd of men stand watching draft cards burning. A uniformed soldier wearing a beret offers his card.

Created by Binksternet (talk). Self nom at 18:02, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

  • The only source cited says "charged," not arrested. Charged means an indictment, not necessarily an arrest. Either add a new source, or change the hook. Also, the text of the article attributes this to a source: "Jezer said the FBI arrested only Rader." Is there any reason to believe Jezer is unreliable (besides the fact that he only says charged)? Savidan 20:03, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Itamar attack

!-- --> --BabbaQ (talk) 11:15, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

  • This article is not yet stable, so I think it will need a couple of days to settle down. I also currently have some minor NPOV concerns, but hopefully they can be remedied quickly. The article has also been nominated at ITN BTW. Gatoclass (talk) 16:43, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Silver Bow Basin

Created by Rosiestep (talk), Dr. Blofeld (talk). Self nom at 04:21, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Anglo-French blockade of the Río de la Plata

Portrait of a naval battle

Created by MBelgrano (talk). Self nom at 03:49, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

  • DYK check says the date and length are good. The image is public domain because of its age. The hook is not expressly supported by citation: the whole article must be read to understand that the blockade might have been five years long and that it was unsuccessful (or successfully resisted). The phrase "five-year long" only occurs in the lead paragraph, and has no cite. The starting year of 1845 only occurs in the lead section and infobox with no cite. The final year of 1850 only occurs in the infobox with no cite.
  • Other problems of translation are in the article. Large numbers have a period instead of the English comma. Adjectives such as montevidean and garibaldian should be capitalized. Steam-powered warships are misrepresented as 'vapors': "the steam vapors fired for more than four hours". The article shows an over-reliance on one source: Historia Argentina.
  • The hook puts the article title into a pipe link which appears as "naval blockade". This makes it look like the new article is about naval blockades in general, a subject covered at blockade. Perhaps the hook's pipe link should be in this form: five-year naval blockade. Binksternet (talk) 17:52, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Done. I have fixed the copyedit, and included references from another book. Even so, I should mention that I did not choose Rosa randomly, it's the author who made the most comprehensive work I have seen so far about this conflict. Let's say that this article, long as it is, is but just a very brief summary of his work (I will expand it later for GAN or FAC), and the works from other reputed authors as Santillán or Tulio Halperín Donghi, if cleaned of wordiness and unrelated info, would be summaries of this article. The hook I suggested is just a reformulation of an accepted hook of a previous nomination of a similar article, the alternative proposal would seem as follows MBelgrano (talk) 01:40, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

May 21st, 2011 doomsday prediction

Created by Ashershow1 (talk). Nominated by Ashershow (talk) at 23:17, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Huda Ben Amer

Created by Sandstein (talk). Self nom at 20:10, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Root Covered Bridge

A red wooden covered bridge that crosses a stream.

Created by Nyttend (talk). Self nom at 19:05, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Indian Widow (Joseph Wright painting)

silhouette of woman against bright sky

Created by Andrew Dalby (talk). Nominated by Victuallers (talk) at 14:01, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Air-tractor sledge

An aeroplane, without wings or sheathing.

Created by Apterygial (talk). Self nom at 04:57, 12 March 2011 (UTC)


To the One

- ready. Dincher (talk) 03:53, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Created by J04n (talk). Self nom at 03:47, 12 March 2011 (UTC)


Marathon Dam

A structure coated with marble impounds a reservoir

Created/self-nom by--NortyNort (Holla) 06:30, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Date, size and hook checked.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 20:13, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Battle of Ohrid

Created by Gaius Claudius Nero (talk). Self nom at 18:47, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on March 13

Juliette (TV series)

Created by Dl2000 (talk). Self nom at 02:49, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Port of Saint John

Created by Verne Equinox (talk). Self nom at 23:09, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Diosso

5x expanded by Dr. Blofeld (talk), Rosiestep (talk). Self nom at 17:09, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Reviewed Sologubovka CemeteryDr. Blofeld 17:13, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Expansion, date and hook fact all check but I find the hook confusing, thinking its about the gorge, not the town, despite the fact that only "Diosso" is in blue. ALT 1 ... that the gorge near the town of Diosso is known as the "Grand Canyon of the Congo"?Thelmadatter (talk) 22:26, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Frank Kell Cahoon

Created by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 14:27, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Reviewed: 1900 Hoboken Docks Fire

T. Lawrence Dale

Created by Motacilla (talk). Self nom at 10:58, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Virginia Board of Health

  • ... that the Virginia Board of Health became a focus of the abortion debate when it was required to regulate outpatient clinics that perform first trimester abortions?

Created by Racepacket (talk). Self nom at 02:59, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Date and length check out, but I'm having a problem with the hook fact. The only part of the article that specifically states that the Board has "become a focus of the abortion debate" is the phrase "It is playing a prominent role in abortion access issues" in the lead, which is uncited. Is there a source available that states that the board is playing a prominent role, or has become the "focus" of debate? If so, the article should be expanded a little to state this. A newspaper article should be enough. The article's last section seems to indicate that there is tension regarding the regulation of abortion clinics, but without a source that specifically states that the Board has become the "focus", saying that ourselves is synthesis, which we want to avoid. --dragfyre_ʞןɐʇc 17:25, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
Focus was my characterization of the newspaper articles. The Washington Post articles, here and here outline how the new law requires the Board to vote on abortion clinic regulation at its September 2011 meeting, under the emergency rulemaking provisions that I quote in the Virginia Board of Health article. The second Washington Post article says, "With those actions, McDonnell’s eight appointments will outnumber board members chosen by former governor Timothy M. Kaine (D). The shift will occur just as the board considers controversial new rules for clinics that antiabortion activists have said will make the facilities safer, but that clinic operators and abortion rights supporters fear could force many to close." and "Former colleagues and others say they’re uncertain about many members’ positions on abortion." An earlier Washington Post story said, "Cobb and other abortion opponents said no one knows what the Board of Health will do." Whatever it takes to fix this please let me know. However, my ability to edit the article directly is limited. Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 21:43, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Joseph Barss (ice hockey coach)

Created by Cbl62 (talk). Self nom at 01:42, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Hook, date and length all check out. Racepacket (talk) 03:03, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

La Nueva Viga Market

Created by Thelmadatter (talk). Self nom at 00:41, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

  • Reviewed Chapter 3 of the Syrian Constitution from March 9
  • Size and date ok. The source says that "it is considered the world’s second, only exceeded by that of Tokyo in Japan." Does it mean we should add word "considered" before "second largest" in the hook?--Antidiskriminator (talk) 22:33, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Several Spanish language sources state that it is the second largest. I put a cite to one of them next to the English language source to be on the safe side.Thelmadatter (talk) 16:37, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
I am sorry if I was not clear enough. English is not my native language. I did not say that there is a problem with references. I only proposed to "consider" adding the word "considered" in the hook (like:"is considered the second largest seafood market") because that was the word used in the source. I red in few dictionaries that when something is "considered" that means that it is not calculated on the basis of exact figures, but estimated after "giving careful thought to something". Probably it is hard to calculate the size of the fish market because it depends not only on the volumes but values, number of participants, number of different articles.... That was probably the reason for the sources to add certain limitation to the claim. The first one by adding the word "considered" and the second (on Spanish language) to add that it is the second on the world volume-wise.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 18:38, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Pavel Petrovich Parenago

Created by Tyrol5 (talk). Self nom at 23:51, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Sologubovka Cemetery

  • ... that Sologubovka Cemetery is the largest German war cemetery in the world and the final resting place of over 30,000 German war dead from World War II?

Created by Leidseplein (talk). Self nom at 23:38, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Liberalisme (anthology)

Created by Eisfbnore (talk). Self nom at 20:58, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

  • Timeliness of submission, length of article, and within policy all check out. One online and one offline citation (both in Norwegian) AFG. Hook length is 214, but given the lengthy title of the book (which doubles as the title of the article), I conclude that the length violation can be waived this time. OK for DYK! - Tim1965 (talk) 20:36, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
Thanks! Any idea of how I can shorten the hook somewhat? --Eisfbnore 20:40, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
  • I thought instead of saying "Norwegian language" you could just say "Norwegian." That brings it down to just 205 characters. You might also take out the clause "they thought," as I think it still makes sense (it is still clear that it refers back to the reviewers). It'd be under 200 then. - Tim1965 (talk) 02:19, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Andor Harvey Gomme

Created by Geometry guy (talk). Nominated by Peter I. Vardy (talk) at 20:04, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

869 Jōgan earthquake and tsunami

Created by Mikenorton (talk). Self nom at 18:22, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Neckar-Alb Railway

--BabbaQ (talk) 13:17, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

  • - Length and creation date are fine, but the article suffers from poor referencing. Please add more inline sources. Also, in a such a long article, I'd guess that you'll find a more interesting hook than this one. --Eisfbnore 13:21, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Ragnar Stoud Platou

Created by Eisfbnore (talk). Self nom at 10:58, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

John Balmer

Informal head-and-shoulders portrait of grinning man in light-coloured shirt with palm trees in background

  • ... that John Balmer (pictured) achieved renown as a flying instructor in the RAAF by allegedly parachuting from a training aircraft to force his pupil to land single-handed?

Created by Ian Rose (talk). Self nom at 10:20, 13 March 2011 (UTC)


Pierrot lunaire (book)

Created by User:Beebuk (talk). Self nom at 03:03, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

  • Article is almost entirely without inline references; the footnotes are almost entirely comments, and while it's not inappropriate to have footnoted comments, these need to be in a separate section, and if we separate footnoted comments and citations, we'll be left with nothing in this section. You've given plenty of works in the "References" section; could you please add citations to them? If you're unfamiliar with the process of citations, read WP:CITE or leave a note at my talk page. Nyttend (talk) 04:00, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Stafford L. Warren

Created by Hawkeye7 (talk) 02:49, 13 March 2011 (UTC). Self nom at 02:45, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Good to go MBelgrano (talk) 03:39, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

F. S. Platou

Created by Eisfbnore (talk). Self nom at 02:39, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Bernt Heiberg

Created by Eisfbnore (talk). Self nom at 00:51, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Reviewed #Krank (song): --Eisfbnore 00:52, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Krank (song)

  • .... that the video for industrial rock band KMFDM's new song "Krank" was simultaneously shot in Hamburg, Seattle, and Portland, Oregon?

Created by Torchiest (talk). Self nom at 00:37, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

inSpiral Lounge

The inSpiral Lounge and Walkers Quay on Regent's Canal

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Paul Bedson (talkcontribs) 03:01, 14 March 2011 (UTC)


Thanaleng Railway Station

New railway station with red roof

Created by Dragfyre (talk). Self nom at 17:42, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Reviewed: Ziridava, Mauro Solar Riser, Virginia Board of Health
  • A quick note about this article: reviewers will note that the history goes back to January. I actually meant to create the article in my user space, but created it in article space by mistake instead. Once I realized what happened, I moved it back into my user space, and kept it there until March 13, when I moved it back into article space. I believe this should still count for DYK, despite the irregularities. --dragfyre_ʞןɐʇc 18:08, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
Article length, formatting, citations, hook length and cited hook fact all check out fine. No other problems found except that the article is currently a near-orphan, but that can be easily and quickly remedied. I noticed that some of the cited sources use the spelling "Tha Na Laeng", but three of them used "Thanaleng", and since Misplaced Pages has no article on that place, I see no problem with the choice of "Thanaleng" by Dragfyre. I agree with his position that the the 5-day rule has not been violated in this case. If one looks at the first versions, compared with the current one, it's clear that he indeed did not intend to create it in article namespace at that time, and within just hours it was moved out of article space, and an administrator deleted it there until Dragfyre moved it back on March 13. SJ Morg (talk) 12:41, 16 March 2011 (UTC)


Articles created/expanded on March 14

Alaska-Juneau Gold Mining Company

Created by Rosiestep (talk). Self nom at 03:27, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Munich Chamber Orchestra

Created by Gerda Arendt (talk). Self nom at 23:38, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Holy Trinity Avonside

View of a collapsed church.

  • Reviewed: yet to be done
  • Comment: Another Category I heritage item destroyed in the 2011 Christchurch earthquake.

Created by Melburnian (talk), Schwede66 (talk). Self nom at 18:42, 16 March 2011 (UTC)


Trolleybuses in Valparaíso

An historic 1952-built trolleybus runs along a street in Valparaíso, Chile's city center in 2008

  • ... that regular public transit service in Valparaíso, Chile, is provided by historic trolleybuses (pictured) that were built some 60 years ago, by Pullman, and were declared a national monument in 2003?
  • ALT1:... that regular public transit service in Valparaíso, Chile, is provided by historic trolleybuses (pictured) that were built between 1946 and 1952 by Pullman and were declared a national monument in 2003?
  • Reviewed: Thanaleng Railway Station ()
  • Comment: The image, if included, can and should be cropped for DYK. However, if this is done (on a temporary basis for Main Page) by whomever prepares the final version, I recommend cropping the original to no smaller than 550 by 550 pixels (before thumbnailed to 100px for Main Page), and with a vertical center at the level of the driver's head (no crop from top of original). The last time I had a photo in DYK, another editor did that cropping during the final prep, and I suppose that's the usual practice, but if it would be helpful for me to do that, someone please let me know.

Created by SJ Morg (talk). Self nom at 13:14, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

  • Below is another alt, offered in case the reviewer feels it's important that the full title of the new article be shown and made bold. Advantages to the first hooks I suggested are that they indicate that these vehicles are in regular public service (not just some sort of special tourist service), and also that, if the image is used, placement of the "(pictured)" note is easy with those hook wordings, but would be difficult to do in a clear manner with this ALT2 hook wording.
  • ALT2:... that among the trolleybuses in Valparaíso, Chile, are several vehicles that were built some 60 years ago, by Pullman-Standard in the United States, and declared a Chilean national monument in 2003? SJ Morg (talk) 13:30, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

United States v. Lee

View of a two-story Greek Revival hilltop home built in 1831 by Robert E. Lee

Created by Tim1965 (talk). Self nom at 20:42, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

  • Just for fun: The date on which G.W.P.C. Lee transferred Arlington National Cemetery back to the U.S. federal government is March 31. If this passes DYK muster, and anyone thinks this should be held until that anniversary date, I am totally amenable to that. (I didn't realize the anniversary date was coming when I started this article.) - Tim1965 (talk) 20:49, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

No, there is no footnote 1 in the text of the first paragraph to confirm the DYK claim, but it is listed on the bottom of the article under references. Hopefully a minor adjustment is needed. Billy Hathorn (talk) 20:55, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

  • Doh! Leads need the same cites as the article text. (my bad!) I changed the lead to add the citations there, and improved the Assessment section, too. - Tim1965 (talk) 02:22, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Where's Raymond?/The Ray Bolger Show

Created by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 20:11, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

ALT . . . that Irene Ryan, seven years before The Beverly Hillbillies, appeared as a shy schoolteacher on a 1955 episode of ABC's The Ray Bolger Show?
Reviewed Osborne Cowles
  • Approved for the first hook only, not the alt. Length of article, date of creation and source check out for the first hook. The alt is problematic because there is nothing in the article or the source material to support the claim that Ryan made her sitcom "debut" on this show. She was a guest star, but there's no source that it was her debut. Cbl62 (talk) 21:29, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
I thought I had corrected hook 2, but it must not have transmitted. It was either her second or third sitcom appearance according to IMDB. I change it again if the first is not allowed. Billy Hathorn (talk) 02:59, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Church of St John the Baptist, Asenovgrad

View of a narrow medieval church topping a cliff

Created by TodorBozhinov (talk). Self nom at 07:50, 15 March 2011 (UTC)


Ithaca Discovery Trail

  • ... that the Ithaca Discovery Trail is a collaboration among seven hands-on museums and the public library in Tompkins County, New York that hosts 2,900 students on field trips each year?

Created by Racepacket (talk). Self nom at 03:56, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

A Many Splendored Thing (Homicide: Life on the Street)

5x expanded by Hunter Kahn (talk). Self nom at 03:49, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

  • Date, length and hook check out, but hook needs an inline reference to its source in the article. In general, the statements in the article lack sources. Racepacket (talk) 04:00, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
    • The hook already has an inline reference to its source. Actually, it has two. The sentence in question is "The Forman case was inspired by a real-life murder that took place in Anne Arundel County, Maryland, in which a 23-year-old man shot another man 10 times in a doughnut shop when the victim refused to sell the shooter his pen." Also, FYI, everything that requires sources in this article is sourced. The plot has no sources because, per WP:TVPLOT, they are not required; and the lead has no citations because, per WP:LEADCITE, they are not required except in special cases as long as the info is sourced in the body of the article. Everything in the body is sourced by inline citations. — Hunter Kahn 04:11, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Robert Perceval Armitage, Rose Chibambo

Created by Aymatth2 (talk). Self nom at 02:36, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

All checks out for both articles. Moonraker2 (talk) 05:28, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Manor Farm, Ruislip

The Great Barn

Created by Harrison49 (talk). Self nom at 00:08, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Philemon Pownoll

Full length portrait of a man leaning on a large anchor in a wig, navy blue coat with gold thread, white breeches and waistcoat

Created by Benea (talk). Self nom at 23:09, 14 March 2011 (UTC)


Lyndon Watts

Created by Gerda Arendt (talk). Self nom at 22:26, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Mercado Jamaica, Mexico City

Cut flowers at Mercado Jamaica

  • ... that the Mercado Jamica market in Mexico City offers about 5,000 species of flowers and ornamental plants including some native species taken from the wild?

Created by Thelmadatter (talk). Self nom at 22:16, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

  • Length and date are all good, but I had to place a footnote after every hook fact in the article (I was only able to do that because a single reference was used). AGF on the source :) — Toдor Boжinov07:59, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
ThanksThelmadatter (talk) 16:38, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Aniba rosaeodora

5x expanded by Miss Madeline (talk). Self nom at 20:48, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Vbos The Kentuckian

Created by Miyagawa (talk). Self nom at 19:28, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

  • Just a quick note to say that I had intended to make this a double nom, with Shargleam Blackcap being up too, however can't find a great deal of resources on that dog (the Daily Mail issue the day after quite literally has just a photo and no article) and so have only been able to create a sub article. Miyagawa (talk) 19:31, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

The Jo Stafford Show (1961)

  • ... that The Jo Stafford Show has been described as "the first truly international television musical series"?

Created by TheRetroGuy (talk). Self nom at 18:43, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

  • Cheers. Forgot to mention this yesterday that there is also The Jo Stafford Show, an article about a different show presented by the same person, which was created on 12 March. If anyone has a suggestion to link these two together for a double nom that would be grand. TheRetroGuy (talk) 15:58, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Taunton Tramway

  • ... that the Taunton Tramway closed down when its power was cut off during a dispute over the cost of electricity?

Created by Geof Sheppard (talk). Self nom at 14:07, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Length, date, and hook check out. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 20:30, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Wilson's Arch

Black and white photo of two standing men, below an archway, facing a number of seated men and women

Created by NearTheZoo (talk). Nominated by --Epeefleche (talk) 07:14, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

1900 Hoboken Docks Fire

Created by Wikijsmak (talk). Nominated by Mjroots (talk) at 06:37, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Comment. Might it not be better to simply say "the 1900 Hoboken Docks Fire" {though one could slot "New Jersey" in there w/a dab), rather than a ''']''' in ] in 1900?--Epeefleche (talk) 07:45, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Billy Hathorn (talk) 14:23, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
I revised the underlying page to more closely fit the references, but the hook is still fine.Wikijsmak (talk) 02:27, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Dan Farrell

Created by Cbl62 (talk). Self nom at 05:52, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Good to go.--Epeefleche (talk) 07:40, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Włodzimierz Godłowski

Created by User:Piotrus (talk). Self nom at 04:45, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

  • Length and creation date verified. Sourcing is in Polish and is accepted in good faith from an established DYK contributor. If there is a Polish language reviewer who can give this a second look, that would be helpful. Cbl62 (talk) 06:03, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Konbaung-Hanthawaddy War

Created by Hybernator (talk). Self nom at 01:57, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

HMS Constance (1846)

Created by Tentontunic (talk). Self nom at 21:45, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

  • I've formatted the hook to include the article, but I'm afraid it is inaccurate. Compound engines had been used in marine propulsion since 1854. What you could say though is that Constance was the first Royal Navy vessel driven by a compound engine, which is accurate. At the moment though the article is vague about what it is actually claiming. Benea (talk) 23:02, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Edited to reflect what you have said. Tentontunic (talk) 23:45, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Favicon

5x expanded by Mabdul (talk). Self nom at 23:05, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

  • The recent expansion appears to have begun around 23 February, and involves bringing the page from 4370 characters (716 words) of "readable prose" to 5424 characters (902 words). This is not a 5x expansion, nor is it timely enough for DYK. Binksternet (talk) 16:14, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Dai-ichi (disambiguation)

  • ... dai-ichi (第一) is a compound phrase of Japanese origin meaning number one?

Created by Swliv (talk). Self nom 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on March 15

Belovo Basilica

An ancient brick wall with a number of wide arches

Created by TodorBozhinov (talk). Self nom at 15:24, 16 March 2011 (UTC)


Will Henry Stevens

Monochrome studio portrait of Will Henry Stevens

Created by Jordan Ahlers (talk). Nominated by Chzz (talk) at 12:45, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

  • The most interesting part of the hook (in my mind at least) is not mentioned in the article. There is no mention of egg in the article, only tempera. I realize that tempera can be made from egg, but looking at its article it doesn't have to be "usually a glutinous material such as egg yolk or some other size". Being that the ref isn't available online I can't double check to see if the subject used egg or not. Can this be double checked and clarified in the article? J04n(talk page) 00:07, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Fair point. Yes, as you see, I was trying to make the tag 'interesting' - but I accept what you're saying, that tempera might not be egg. I will try and check with the main author of the article, and/or try to check it myself, and respond ASAP. Thanks,  Chzz  ►  01:11, 17 March 2011 (UTC)


Thomas Fitch (politician)

Thomas Fitch in 1865 from Harper's Monthly Magazine

5x expanded by btphelps (talk). Self nom at 00:44, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Billy Hathorn (talk) 03:40, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
Alt1
Alt2
  • ... that Thomas Fitch was the lead attorney in defending Brigham Young, along with other LDS church leaders, when they were arrested for "lewd and lascivious cohabitation"?
Alt3

Lectionary 300

Created by Leszek Jańczuk (talk). Self nom at 00:47, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

  • Needs more content. This may work better:

Stephen A. Caldwell

Created by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 23:01, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

The article shows how in the early 20th century in the Deep South people could launch education careers without degrees in hand. Billy Hathorn (talk) 03:02, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
Reviewed Leslie R. Fairn
Perhaps so, but becoming a school principal without classroom experience or a degree in his time probably wasn't that remarkable and isn't very interesting nor notable. It appears that lengthy tenure as dean of the LSU Junior Division was perhaps his most notable accomplishment. But what did he do during his 12 year tenure? If you want to make the hook more inviting, try to work in some other things he did that were more consequential. — btphelps 21:05, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter (film)

Created by Erik (talk). Self nom at 19:20, 15 March 2011 (UTC)


  • I have a couple issues on this one. First and most importantly, this does not appear to be "new" content. It appears that article was simply excised from the existing article on the and moved into a new article on the movie. The article on the book already had the movie discussion, and the movie part was moved into a new article with this diff and the following edit summary: "Moved content to stand-alone article, provided brief summary." I do not believe this meets the "new" content requirement for DYK, but others should speak up if I am mis-reading the rules. Second, I have a recollection that DYK frowns on articles about movies that have not yet been released. In this case, the article reportedly began shooting last week and is currently scheduled to be released in 2012. Again, others should speak up if I am mis-remembering our practice/policy on unreleased movies that are in early stages of production. Cbl62 (talk) 21:44, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
  • You are right that the content is not new, but a new article is created with the content. I think the newness counts because if the film never entered production, the "Film adaptation" section at the novel article is all it would ever be. See Shantaram (film), for example. It is permissible to create articles about upcoming films when they have begun filming, per the notability guidelines for future films. Since filming has begun, we are near-certain (per WP:CRYSTAL) to have a film. Before the start of filming, anything can happen to end the project early. So I would argue that this is a new article based on a new topic, an actual film instead of just plans for one. It's going to have more production information and eventually a reception section covering both reviews and box office results. Erik (talk | contribs) 22:11, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
  • Your reference to the "notability guidelines for future films" appears to resolve the second issue. However, the first objection remains. In that regard, DYK Additional Rule F8 appears to be directly on point: "F8: "a 'new' article is no more than five days old. This does not include articles split from older articles, although an article sufficiently expanded from a section of an older article can be a fivefold expansion. The word "fork" is sometimes used to mean Misplaced Pages:Splitting." Accordingly, you would need to expand the old content by five-fold to qualify. If you can expand the article substantially in the next few days, we could take another look. Cbl62 (talk) 00:22, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Work (Jimmy Eat World song)

5x expanded by PM800 (talk). Self nom at 16:53, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Prose 3933 / 709 = 5.547x expansion and > 1500; RS citations for both factoids in hook; hook 177 chars; seems in order. Dl2000 (talk) 02:58, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Backatown

Lenny Kravitz dressed in black, wearing sunglasses, four earrings in his left ear and a nosering

Created by J04n (talk). Self nom at 03:51, 15 March 2011 (UTC)



James C. Spencer

Created by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 02:54, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Reviewed Charles Stetson Wheeler

Fujinuma Dam

Create/nom--NortyNort (Holla) 12:11, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on March 16

Charles Stetson Wheeler

Monochrome portrait, a man shown from the shoulder up, facing right, wearing a coat and tie, dark hair and dark mustache on a light-skinned face

Created by Binksternet (talk). Self nom at 01:23, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Billy Hathorn (talk) 03:03, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Moody 4B

James Moody with bassist Todd Coolman in background

Created by J04n (talk). Self nom at 00:15, 17 March 2011 (UTC)


Slow loris

A small, young slow loris is gripped by its limbs while its front teeth are cut with fingernail cutter

  • Reviewed: Ryan Kalish ()
  • Comment: This article has been developed as part of a WikiProject Mammals collaboration. The article had a fair amount of content, and depending on how you count the expansion, we are somewhere between 4.5x and 5x. (Using the preferred method described in the rules, I get 5x. There were concerns about the possibility of reaching 5x expansion with this article, and they were asked at Misplaced Pages talk:Did you know#Expansion question. Regardless of how the expansion is ultimately scored, I ask for a special case of leniency given the importance of this article. (It is currently getting hammered due to a new viral video on YouTube.) – VisionHolder « talk » 21:46, 16 March 2011 (UTC)


Pintomyia falcaorum

Created by Kevmin (talk). Self nom at 20:55, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Bill Shipman

Created by BigDom (talk). Self nom at 20:09, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Turkish Union of Xanthi

  • ... that the Turkish Union of Xanthi was banned by Greek courts because the use of the word "Turkish" in its title was considered to endanger public order?

Created by ZjarriRrethues (talk). Self nom at 19:07, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Three for the Road (TV series)

Created by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 18:57, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

:Reviewed John Howell & Son

John Howell & Son

19th-century Gothic Revival stone church with square tower

Created by Storye book (talk). Self nom at 18:43, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Is there a reason for writing out "Senior" and "Junior" after the names of the two Howells, instead of Sr., and Jr.? Billy Hathorn (talk) 19:06, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
Hooks check out, otherwise Billy Hathorn (talk) 19:08, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
The two men were never called by those terms except for once in a 19th-century newspaper, where it was spelled "Junior". The terms are rarely used in the UK, and are seen as American English. Common usage in the UK is to give different nicknames to the two men (e.g. Jack and Johnny). Employees might have called them Mister Howell and Young Mister Howell, or the Guvnor and Master Howell. I had to find some way of differentiating between the two men in the article, but there is no satisfactory way. You are welcome to change the spelling if you wish, but if you do, you will make it look as if they were Americans.--Storye book (talk) 19:18, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

HMS Mendip (L60)

The Ibrahim al-Awwal being towed to port after being captured by the Israeli Navy

Created by Tzu Zha Men (talk). Self nom at 18:28, 16 March 2011 (UTC)


Claude Arnulphy

Claude Arnulphy, portrait dated 1746

Created by Moonraker2 (talk). Self nom at 05:42, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Nice work. Date and length are good, image is old enough for PD, offline ref accepted in GF. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 09:48, 16 March 2011 (UTC)


First Unitarian Church (Cincinnati, Ohio)

A black-and-white portrait of a young man in formal dress

5x expanded by Nyttend (talk). Self nom at 04:03, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

  • Date, length and hook-citation check out. Nice photographic portrait, too. NB: (1) I'm assuming that "carven" is a US expression? It would be "carved" in the UK; (2) I removed the stub notice from the discussion page.--Storye book (talk) 19:00, 16 March 2011 (UTC)


Ryan Kalish

  • ... that Boston Red Sox baseball player Ryan Kalish didn’t miss a single pitch he swung at in his senior year of high school baseball?

5x expanded and self-nom by --Epeefleche (talk) 03:42, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Henry E. Chambers

Created by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 03:27, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Reviewed Thomas Fitch (politician). Billy Hathorn (talk) 03:39, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
Comment. Actually, the source does not say that. It says that Wilson was one of his "instructors".--Epeefleche (talk) 03:46, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
Change made. Billy Hathorn (talk) 03:05, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Abu Madi

Created by Paul Bedson (talk). Self nom at 15:42, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Labweh

Created by Paul Bedson (talk). Self nom at 01:57, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on March 17

Special occasion holding area

Do not nominate new articles for a special time in this section. Instead, please nominate them in the candidate entries section above under the date the article was created or the expansion began, and indicate your request for a specially-timed appearance on the Main Page.
Note: Articles nominated for a special occasion should be nominated within five days of creation or expansion as usual (with the exception of April Fools' Day 2011 - see Misplaced Pages:April Fool's Main Page/Did You Know). Also, articles should be nominated at least five days before the occasion to give reviewers time to check the nomination.

March 15

Glee: The Music, Volume 5

  • ... that Glee: The Music, Volume 5 includes two original songs written specifically for the series? ALT below for double hook is now approved and preferred over this one.

Created by CycloneGU (talk). Self nom at 07:11, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

  • This is being proposed for inclusion on March 8, when the soundtrack comes out. The article itself will get significant expansion up to March 8 and beyond, when reception is covered. This can be reworded if need be, and I'll happily participate in that process to find a better wording. Please keep in mind the March 8 proposed inclusion when considering article length and observe future work on the article before dismissing it. CycloneGU (talk) 07:12, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
  • I have noticed a holding area for March 8 as International Women's Day and several holding requests for that. If it turns out March 8 is impossible, it might be possible to try for March 15 as that is the air date of the episode using the songs I refer to in the hook. In such a case, the hook would need rewriting to refer to "tonight's episode of Glee". CycloneGU (talk) 00:58, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Regardless of the date, this is good to go. The length, refs and date (of creation) are all good.--E♴ (talk) 00:28, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

  • Depending on which of the two dates it ends up on, I've written a couple of possible ALTs.
  • ... that Glee's newest album includes two original songs written specifically for the series? (This is a possible alternative in place of the one proposed above, and might be better because it's more likely to draw mice; with the title given in the hook, people have the ability to look elsewhere instead of clicking.)
  • ... that tonight's episode of Glee will feature two original songs written specifically for the series? (Alternative for March 15, the glitch is that the article doesn't have notability to exist yet - presently it's a redirect to the season article - but will be there by the 15th, but might not be created until the day before. This is why I don't feel good with delaying this one any further past March 8, because five days of working time is advised.)
  • We can also combine those two hooks into one for March 15, i.e. "... that Glee's newest album includes two original songs that appear in tonight's episode of Glee?" This is a double hook if done that way, but we would have to trust that the article will be up to snuff for the episode air date. Based on the entire series of Glee articles, I have no doubt it will as it will definitely exist by the time such a double hook is used on March 15. It could probably even be created right now because we know some of the songs (the original ones of course). CycloneGU (talk) 01:45, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
  • Update: Original Song now exists as an article, which is linked in two of my ALTs including the double hook. If the double hook qualifies, I'd like to also see that for March 15 either separately or in place of the single hook. What is the best way to go about this one?

The double hook is, in my opinion, the best way to go. The length and date check out for both. The hook was not referenced completely in Original Song, but I added an inline citation, so that's covered. Whoever promotes this- make sure to do it on the 15th so the "tonight's episode" part will be correct. --E♴ (talk) 02:06, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

One more thing- both articles should be bolded in the hook so that it looks like this:
... that Glee's newest album includes two original songs that appear in tonight's episode of Glee?

--E♴ (talk) 02:06, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Change made above. CycloneGU (talk) 02:26, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

FINAL WORDING - "... that Glee's newest album includes two original songs that appear in the Glee episode Original Song?" (Updated slightly on March 15 because of late concerns brought up below.)

Please do not use Misplaced Pages's main page as advertising space to remind readers about an upcoming episode of a TV show. --69.157.47.208 (talk) 05:11, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
I agree actually, I have strong reservations about using this hook on the main page. It's basically an advertisement, which is of course frowned upon in an encyclopedia. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 20:37, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
I agree as well - and further, the date relevance of "tonight" may only be relevant in certain markets. What day will the episode air in Britain, for example? If this goes live, I would suggest simply naming and linking to the epdisode article rather than the extra-promo of "tonight". Echoedmyron (talk) 21:54, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Yikes, I just noticed this as I've been busy with personal matters. Fine, how about, "... that Glee's newest album includes two original songs that appear in the Glee episode Original Song?" That way it's not directly advertising. I realize this is cutting it a little close, however, since the episode airs today in the U.S. but this also removes the international ambiguity. I thought the "tonight's episode" thing would be a nice hook, but now that international airings are brought up, it does seem a little iffy that way. CycloneGU (talk) 05:09, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
That looks fine; can just go in whatever queue since 15th's already over queue-wise. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 16:38, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

March 19

WTC 9/11

Speaker iconNORAD radio communications

Created by Jujutacular (talk). Self nom at 21:51, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

March 20

Vita Sancti Cuthberti (anonymous)

Created by Deacon of Pndapetzim (talk). Self nom at 22:11, 13 March 2011 (UTC)


June 19

Rizal Day

A stone pylon with two gold stars at the sides, below of which are inscribed "A Jose Rizal".

Created/expanded by Howard the Duck (talk). Self nom at 05:42, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

  • I don't see why. On the other hand, in the case only a para has a ref, it is impossible to trust anything but the last sentence. Consider what will happen when somebody adds more content to the middle, or moves the current one around. I don't think an article with any unreferenced sentence can become a FA, and GA and DYKs require them for most sentences those days, too. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 07:07, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
  • You see, that only works if each sentence has a different reference than the previous one (such as FAs and some GAs). If I'd be reusing those two references on every sentence, it's repetitive and unsightly. Where's the DYK rule that every sentence has to be cited? The only relevant rule is rule D2 and it doesn't mention citing every sentence, especially if the entire paragraph is referenced on that/those reference/s.–HTD (ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens.) 07:30, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Halloween

Rhacophorus vampyrus

  • ... that the tadpole of the Vampire flying frog Rhacophorus vampyrus has two fang-like hooks in its mouth?

Created by Newone (talk), Ka Faraq Gatri (talk). Nominated by Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) at 14:59, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

  • Comment If the article meets DYK criteria, suggest moving it to Special Occasions section and keeping for Halloween. The authors of the paper on which this article is substantially based have stated that they intend to publish a separate paper on the tadpoles of this species so the move would also allow time for any material from this paper (assuming it is published in time) to be incorporated. Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) 16:56, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
  • That's confirmed. I agree that this should be kept for Halloween, especially as "A detailed description of the new tadpole will be published separately." which might be available by October. It's certainly an early start for the Halloween collection, does anyone think it is a problem to save it until then? SmartSE (talk) 23:41, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
SUPPORT waiting till Halloween, esp. if we can get a good, free picture of the scary tadpoles. --PFHLai (talk) 04:06, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
I've moved this as there were no objections. If someone wants to make a subpage for it, like we have for April Fools' nominations then feel free. SmartSE (talk) 12:46, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Comment Halloween is just under 10 months away. I can't help thinking that if every vaguely ghoulish or spooky article is saved up that long, it will create a massive backlog (and a precedent for other days). After all, there are only 3-4 sessions of 6 or 7 hooks available for any particular day. Bob talk 22:26, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Comment I have a raised eyebrow over this. Essentially were promoting an article to DYK, which in over half a year will appear on the main page. Would not this article be substatiannnly different from the one reviewed giving that theres 7+ months between creation and DYK appearance? Ottawa4ever (talk) 15:14, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Comment Good points. This article could be significantly different from the one reviewed by 31st October depending on whether or not the group concerned have published their second paper on the species (one which focuses specifically on the unusual tadpoles) by then. As it stands the article was written from all the extant scientific literature on the species (a single paper) and a smattering of popular press coverage (who probably won't ever revisit the species, unless a big deal is made out of the second paper). It is possible someone will re-write the article from the current sources, however, most articles on obscure species (of which this is one) don't have very high edit levels. For comparison, a large number of articles on other species in the same genus were created by Polbot and haven't been significantly altered since their creation in 2007. Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) 16:14, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for your input. Ive opened a larger discussion here; Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know#Rhacophorus_vampyrus. Its not just that the article may be different, but also that dyk is in the spirit of new articles or recently expanded ones. As such (I feel) queing an article for 10 months is misleading our readers since it is a violation of both leading principles of dyk. Ottawa4ever (talk) 10:29, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

See also

Category: