Misplaced Pages

Didacticism: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:12, 2 February 2006 editDanielCD (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users31,574 editsm Reverted edits by 67.181.213.175 (talk) to last version by YurikBot← Previous edit Revision as of 12:38, 3 March 2006 edit undoKnightRider~enwiki (talk | contribs)15,538 editsm warnfile Adding: esNext edit →
Line 21: Line 21:
] ]
] ]
]
] ]
] ]

Revision as of 12:38, 3 March 2006

Didactic refers to literature or other types of art that are instructional or informative. It does not merely entertain. In this sense the Bible is didactic because it offers guidance in moral, religious, and ethical matters. It tells stories of the lives of people that followed Judeo-Christian teachings, and stories of people that decided to go against God and the consequences that they faced. Another example is Alexander Pope's An Essay on Criticism, which offers a range of good criticism and advice.

The term "didactic" also refers to texts that are overburdened with instructive and factual information, sometimes to the detriment of a reader's enjoyment. The opposite of "didactic" is "non-didactic." If a writer is more concerned with artistic qualities and techniques than with conveying a message, then that piece of work is considered to be non-didactic, even if it is instructive.

Some have suggested that nearly all of the best poetry is didactic. Contrarily, Edgar Allan Poe called didacticism the worst of "heresies" in his essay The Poetic Principle.

Other examples of didactic literature include:

Stub icon

This literature-related article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: