Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 09:27, 27 March 2011

Food and drink Stub‑class

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink Stub This article has been rated as Stub-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter. Food and Drink task list: edit history watch purge To edit this page, select here Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink: Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish Participate in project-related deletion discussions. Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this. Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here. Provide photographs and images for Category:Misplaced Pages requested images of food Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Spirits Stub‑class

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spirits, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spirits or Distilled beverages on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpiritsWikipedia:WikiProject SpiritsTemplate:WikiProject SpiritsSpirits Stub This article has been rated as Stub-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter. Spirits WikiProject task list: This list is transcluded from the tasks page, to edit it click here. Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Spirits: Tagging all articles that fall under our scope with {{WikiProject Spirits}} and assessing their quality and importance to the project.

Question: Is Tanqueray a higher quality version of Gordon's? On the Gordon's bottles, the Royal Warrant states: "By appointment to Her Majesty The Queen Tanqueray Gordon." Both are owned by Diageo, but are they from the same distiller? Malakaville 08:22, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

As indicates, in 1898 Alexander Gordon & Co merged with Charles Tanqueray & Co, forming Tanqueray Gordon & Co. That company is now owned by Diageo. Given that Tanqueray and Gordon's have a very different flavour (in that Tanqueray isn't actually revolting ;-) ), I wouldn't have thought that it was a "higher quality version", just a different product made by the same company. However, given modern production methods and economies of scale, it wouldn't surprise me in the slightest if they were both made of the same basic grain spirit etc, but I can't find anything to confirm that. Cheers, DWaterson 01:17, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

When did Gordon's cease being a quality brand and start being minging? Surely since the 'fifties, when Ian Fleming made James Bond order it in his Vesper martini. I really can't imagine that someone so picky about food and drink as Fleming would in any way have recommended Gordon's as it is today. 195.92.40.49 18:27, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

both gins are made by the same company and often in the same distillery (the UK production plant is in Cameronbridge, Fife). The raw material/starch source is likely to be the same in both cases (wheat or maize are both common, depending on price/supply) which produces the neutral spirit. The difference is then the recipe with the botanicals, the mixture and quantities used. The two gins have different recipes Rachelcgen (talk) 14:36, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Cultural reference - The African Queen

I added some info about Gordon's appearance in "The African Queen." JMarkievicz2 06:16, 29 July 2007 (UTC) .

Confliction

The article conflicts itself. First it says that the recipe is has remained constant, then it explains how the recipe changed and how the proof was lessened..

there's a difference between the recipe which is about what botanicals are used, which has remained constant and how much water is added to the mixture to change the alcohol level. If you reduce the ABV, you get more bottles out of each batch and pay less duty, so cheaper to produce. Rachelcgen (talk) 14:36, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

I wonder which gin has the highest proof..

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 03:34, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Plastic?

The article states that the gin has "always" been available in plastic bottles, but that obviously isn't true since it was first produced in the 18th century. Said sentence should probably be removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.3.118.193 (talk) 07:03, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Picture?

Could anyone care adding a picture? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.81.46.202 (talk) 09:26, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

• Stub-Class Food and drink articles
• Unknown-importance Food and drink articles
• Automatically assessed Food and drink articles
• WikiProject Food and drink articles
• Stub-Class Spirits articles
• Unknown-importance Spirits articles
• Automatically assessed Spirits articles
• WikiProject Spirits articles