Misplaced Pages

:Requests for feedback/2011 March 31: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for feedback Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:50, 31 March 2011 editMatthewVanitas (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers120,868 edits Jordan Codices: reply← Previous edit Revision as of 18:21, 31 March 2011 edit undoGreenbay1313 (talk | contribs)176 edits UntitledRonn Torossian: new sectionNext edit →
Line 94: Line 94:


:If you've used them in footnotes, you don't need to repeat on a bulleted list. Main thing: your article needs Categories. Check out similar articles for ideas, and apply the ''most specific'' cats possible (i.e. ''not'' "Jordan", "Archaeology", etc.). ] (]) 16:50, 31 March 2011 (UTC) :If you've used them in footnotes, you don't need to repeat on a bulleted list. Main thing: your article needs Categories. Check out similar articles for ideas, and apply the ''most specific'' cats possible (i.e. ''not'' "Jordan", "Archaeology", etc.). ] (]) 16:50, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

== ]Ronn Torossian ==

<!-- Type your question or comment under this line... -->
] article has been completely redone in last few days by biased user. Please assist in removing BLP. --] (]) 18:21, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
<!-- ...but don't type after this line!
Your signature has already been added! -->] (]) 18:21, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:21, 31 March 2011

< 2011 March 30 2011 March 31 2011 April 1 >
Back to main feedback page Index of all pages

Jesse P. Rodriguez

Please double check these facts and add web links where needed. Thank you,


Jrodriguez5575 (talk) 05:49, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

The article is up for deletion as it is an unreferenced WP:BLP, fails to establish notability, and is an autobiography. Autobiographies are strongly discouraged on Misplaced Pages (see Misplaced Pages:Autobiography). MatthewVanitas (talk) 14:19, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Results of the Canadian federal election, 2011

I hope this article is effective in presenting the results of the upcoming Canadian election on 2 May, 2011. Thanks!

Cpl123 (talk) 09:12, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

User:R0cky83/MATIS Group

Hello, as I am actually writing my master thesis about employer attractivity in the engineering service field, I thought it would be a good example to create this page about MATIS, in order to see if there's an impact concerning visibility, CI, etc.

Thanks for your feedback

R0cky83 (talk) 09:31, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Brian Whelan

I have improved the placement of the fotos...but one is not centered well. Grateful if you could fix that pls. Is the article ready to launch? Thanks.

Wendyroseberry (talk) 09:46, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Judith V. Jordan

I have created a draft this article and would like feedback so it can be submitted. Thanks!


Thank you! I have updated the footnotes but do not know how to change the title of the page. Please let me know what else should be corrected!


Douglasskr (talk) 14:15, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Greetings, the article isn't ready yet as it doesn't establish WP:Notability. Please see Misplaced Pages:Biography for details on how notability must be established, and how basic facts in a bio of a living person (WP:BLP) must all be substantiated by footnotes to prevent inaccuracy or libel. Note also that titles/honorifics/degrees are not used in article titles. MatthewVanitas (talk) 14:18, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

I have updated the footnotes but do not know how to change the title of the page. Please let me know what else should be corrected! Douglasskr (talk) 14:37, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

I've moved your article from your Userpage to the main article space, under the proper title. The footnotes could still use improving from more neutral, third-party sources (leans too heavily currently on JBMTI sources themselves); however that's not insurmountable, so I've just tagged it {primary} for now. One thing that definitely does need to be fixed though: article needs Categories. Make sure to apply the most specific categories possible. That is, not "Psychology", but "American psychologists" or whichever. I'm not familiar with psych cats, so please poke around at the sub-categories of Category:Psychologists and see which one or more categories need to be added to the bottom of your article. MatthewVanitas (talk) 14:53, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Corruption of Science and Education in Iran ‎

Hi folks, please help me improve this article. Thanks.


Aramian21 (talk) 14:58, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Article has some major issues with WP:POV and WP:SYNTH: it takes various events (which are properly footnoted), but merges them together to prove a point, and also phrases it in an accusatory tone. It is evident that the intent of the article is to criticise rather than inform. MatthewVanitas (talk) 15:13, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Swiftlight (software)

I would like to know if this article can be posted. I have noticed other similar articles on software. Kind regards, Paula


Pc kirby (talk) 16:14, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Jordan Codices

I have several sources, some of which are cited by number, but duplicated in the bulleted list. Should I remove those that are cited by number from the bulleted list, or leave them in both locations?


Fleckerl (talk) 16:37, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

If you've used them in footnotes, you don't need to repeat on a bulleted list. Main thing: your article needs Categories. Check out similar articles for ideas, and apply the most specific cats possible (i.e. not "Jordan", "Archaeology", etc.). MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:50, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

UntitledRonn Torossian

Ronn Torossian article has been completely redone in last few days by biased user. Please assist in removing BLP. --greenbay1313 (talk) 18:21, 31 March 2011 (UTC) greenbay1313 (talk) 18:21, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Requests for feedback/2011 March 31: Difference between revisions Add topic