Misplaced Pages

User talk:Trasie123: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:26, 10 April 2011 editTomballguy (talk | contribs)2,223 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 23:26, 10 April 2011 edit undoTomballguy (talk | contribs)2,223 edits →HiNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
==Hi== ==Hi==
I recently saw that you recently added quoted my edits as vandalism. I just wanted to remind you that vandalism is defined at ] as "any addition, removal, or change of content in a ''deliberate'' attempt to compromise the integrity of Misplaced Pages" (emphasis in original) and that good-faith edits (as what my recent edits on ] were in the first place) or content disputes do not qualify as vandalism, even if the user involved is persistent (although, policies against edit warring might be applicable). Please therefore take care to make sure that an edit is vandalism before warning the user on their talk page, or before seeking administrative action. Thank you. --] (]) 23:26, 10 April 2011 (UTC)Chris I recently saw that you quoted my edits as vandalism. I just wanted to remind you that vandalism is defined at ] as "any addition, removal, or change of content in a ''deliberate'' attempt to compromise the integrity of Misplaced Pages" (emphasis in original) and that good-faith edits (as what my recent edits on ] were in the first place) or content disputes do not qualify as vandalism, even if the user involved is persistent (although, policies against edit warring might be applicable). Please therefore take care to make sure that an edit is vandalism before warning the user on their talk page, or before seeking administrative action. Thank you. --] (]) 23:26, 10 April 2011 (UTC)Chris

Revision as of 23:26, 10 April 2011

Hi

I recently saw that you quoted my edits as vandalism. I just wanted to remind you that vandalism is defined at WP:VAND as "any addition, removal, or change of content in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Misplaced Pages" (emphasis in original) and that good-faith edits (as what my recent edits on 2009-2011 Toyota vehicle recalls were in the first place) or content disputes do not qualify as vandalism, even if the user involved is persistent (although, policies against edit warring might be applicable). Please therefore take care to make sure that an edit is vandalism before warning the user on their talk page, or before seeking administrative action. Thank you. --It's Senior Year! (talk) 23:26, 10 April 2011 (UTC)Chris