| Revision as of 13:52, 25 February 2011 editChwyatt (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,946 editsm →External links← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:14, 14 April 2011 edit undoKen keisel (talk | contribs)2,987 edits updated entryNext edit → | ||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
| While its predecessor, the T3M spent much of its time operating from floats, by the time the T4M and TG entered service, the U.S. Navy had realised the greater versatility of the aircraft carrier, and the T4Ms and TGs were mainly operated with wheeled undercarriages from the decks of carriers.<ref name="Swan navy p312"/> The capability of carrier based air power was demonstrated in fleet exercises in January 1929, when aircraft from ''Saratoga'', including T4Ms carried out mock attacks on the Panama Canal. Despite a defending force including ''Lexington'' and shore based Navy and ] aircraft, the strike force was judged to have "destroyed" the canal locks as well as airfields. The exercise was described as "the most brilliantly conceived and most effectively executed naval operation in our history" by Admiral William V Pratt, who later became Commander in Chief of the U.S. Fleet.<ref name="Polmar p41-43">Polmar 2004, p41-43</ref> | While its predecessor, the T3M spent much of its time operating from floats, by the time the T4M and TG entered service, the U.S. Navy had realised the greater versatility of the aircraft carrier, and the T4Ms and TGs were mainly operated with wheeled undercarriages from the decks of carriers.<ref name="Swan navy p312"/> The capability of carrier based air power was demonstrated in fleet exercises in January 1929, when aircraft from ''Saratoga'', including T4Ms carried out mock attacks on the Panama Canal. Despite a defending force including ''Lexington'' and shore based Navy and ] aircraft, the strike force was judged to have "destroyed" the canal locks as well as airfields. The exercise was described as "the most brilliantly conceived and most effectively executed naval operation in our history" by Admiral William V Pratt, who later became Commander in Chief of the U.S. Fleet.<ref name="Polmar p41-43">Polmar 2004, p41-43</ref> | ||
| The T4M was not universally liked by its crews. The narrow undercarrage proved prone to ground-looping. Of its flying qualities, one pilot was quoted a stating "It takes off, flies, and lands at 60 knots". | |||
| The T4M and TG proved difficult to replace, with both the ] and ] being evaluated but failing to demonstrate sufficient improvement to justify purchase.<ref name="Strike">Johnson 2005, p.4-5</ref> They remained in service until 1938,<ref name="Grossnickp508"/> being eventually replaced by the ] and becoming the last biplane torpedo bomber of the U.S. Navy.<ref name="Swan navy p313"/> | The T4M and TG proved difficult to replace, with both the ] and ] being evaluated but failing to demonstrate sufficient improvement to justify purchase.<ref name="Strike">Johnson 2005, p.4-5</ref> They remained in service until 1938,<ref name="Grossnickp508"/> being eventually replaced by the ] and becoming the last biplane torpedo bomber of the U.S. Navy.<ref name="Swan navy p313"/> | ||
Revision as of 20:14, 14 April 2011
| T4M/TG | |
|---|---|
| |
| Martin T4M | |
| Role | Torpedo bomberType of aircraft |
| Manufacturer | Glenn L. Martin Company/Great Lakes Aircraft Company |
| First flight | 1927 |
| Introduction | 1928 |
| Retired | 1938 |
| Primary user | United States Navy |
| Number built | 155 |
| Developed from | Martin T3M |
The Martin T4M was an American torpedo bomber of the 1920s. A development by the Glenn L. Martin Company of their earlier Martin T3M, and like it a single engined biplane, the T4M served as the standard torpedo bomber aboard the aircraft carriers of the United States Navy through much of the 1930s.
Development and design
The Martin Model 74 was designed and developed by the Glenn L. Martin Company as a result of testing of the experimental radial engined developments of the Martin T3M, the XT3M-3 and XT3M-4. The resulting prototype, designated XT4M-1, first flew in April 1927, and was purchased by the U.S. Navy for further evaluation.
The XT4M-1 had new single-bay fabric covered metal wings of shorter span than the wooden wings of the T3M. It was powered by a Pratt & Whitney Hornet, (as used by the XT3M-3), and was fitted with a revised rudder. The fuselage was similar to that of the T3M-2, and like the earlier aircraft, could be fitted with either a wheeled undercarriage or floats.
As a result of the successful trials, the U.S. Navy ordered 102 similar production aircraft from Martin as the T4M-1 on June 30, 1927. Martin sold their Cleveland factory, which had built the T4M, to the Great Lakes Aircraft Company in October 1928, which resulted in Great Lakes receiving an order for 18 aircraft with slightly modified undercarriages as the TG-1. On 2 July 1930, the U.S. Navy placed an order for 32 aircraft powered by a more powerful Wright Cyclone radial engines with the Detroit Aircraft Corporation as the TE-1. Detroit, however, passed the order to Great Lakes, which by this time was a subsidiary, and the aircraft were built as TG-2s.
Operational history
,_in_1929.jpg)
Deliveries of the T4M to the U.S. Navy started in August 1928, replacing T3M-2s aboard the aircraft carriers USS Saratoga and USS Lexington. Deliveries continued until 1931.
While its predecessor, the T3M spent much of its time operating from floats, by the time the T4M and TG entered service, the U.S. Navy had realised the greater versatility of the aircraft carrier, and the T4Ms and TGs were mainly operated with wheeled undercarriages from the decks of carriers. The capability of carrier based air power was demonstrated in fleet exercises in January 1929, when aircraft from Saratoga, including T4Ms carried out mock attacks on the Panama Canal. Despite a defending force including Lexington and shore based Navy and Army aircraft, the strike force was judged to have "destroyed" the canal locks as well as airfields. The exercise was described as "the most brilliantly conceived and most effectively executed naval operation in our history" by Admiral William V Pratt, who later became Commander in Chief of the U.S. Fleet.
The T4M was not universally liked by its crews. The narrow undercarrage proved prone to ground-looping. Of its flying qualities, one pilot was quoted a stating "It takes off, flies, and lands at 60 knots".
The T4M and TG proved difficult to replace, with both the XT6M and XT3D being evaluated but failing to demonstrate sufficient improvement to justify purchase. They remained in service until 1938, being eventually replaced by the TBD Devastator and becoming the last biplane torpedo bomber of the U.S. Navy.
Variants
- XT4M-1
- Prototype. Powered by 525 hp (392 kW) Pratt & Whitney R-1690-24 engine. One built.
- T4M-1
- Initial production version by Martin, powered by R-1690-24 engine. 102 built.
- TG-1
- Version with slightly modified undercarriage, powered by 525 hp (392 kW) Pratt & Whitney R-1690-28 engine. 18 built by Great Lakes.
- TG-1 Commercial
- Civil version of TG-1. Two built.
- TG-2
- Version powered by 620 hp (463 kW) Wright R-1820-86 Cyclone. 32 built by Great Lakes (originally ordered as TE-1).
Operators
Specifications (T4M-1)
Data from United States Navy Aircraft since 1911
General characteristics
- Crew: 3
Performance
Armament
- 1 × flexibly mounted 0.3 in (7.62 mm) machine gun in rear cockpit
- 1 × torpedo or bombs under fuselage
See also
Related development
Aircraft of comparable role, configuration, and era
Related lists
References
Notes
- Swanborough and Bowers 1976, p.311
- ^ Grossnick 1995, p.508.
- Taylor 1981, p.93.
- ^ Swanborough and Bowers 1976, p.312
- Polmar 2004, p41-43
- Johnson 2005, p.4-5
- ^ Swanborough and Bowers 1976, p.313
- Great Lakes Aerofiles. Retrieved 27 March 2008.
- Johnson 1977, p.96
- Johnson 1977, p.107.
- Range carrying torpedo. When used in reconnaissance role, range "almost 700 mi" (610 nmi, 1,100 km) - Polmar 2005, p.41
Bibliography
- Angelucci, Enzo (ed.). World Encyclopedia of Military Aircraft. London: Jane's, 1981. ISBN 0 7106 0148 4.
- Donald, David (editor). The Encyclopedia of World Aircraft. Aerospace Publishing. 1997. ISBN 1-85605-375-X.
- Grossnik, Roy A. Dictionary of American Naval Aviation Squadrons: Volume 1 The History of VA, VAH, VAK, VAL, VAP and VFA Squadrons. Washington DC: Naval Historical Centre, 1995. ISBN 0-945274-29-7.
- Johnson, Edward C. Marine Corps Aviation: The Early Years 1912-1940. Washington DC: U.S. Marine Corps, 1977.
- Johnson, E.R. "Strike Force in the Making: U.S. Naval Carrier-Based Attack Aircraft Developments from 1926 to 1940" Skyways , January 2005, p. 2-13.
- Polmar, Norman. Historic Naval Aircraft: From the Pages of Naval History Magazine. Washington, D.C. : Brassey's, 2004. ISBN 1574885723.
- Swanborough, Gordon and Bowers, Peter M. United States Navy Aircraft since 1911. London:Putnam, Second edition 1976. ISBN 0 370 10054 9.
- Taylor, M.J.H. Warplanes of the World: 1918-1939. Shepperton, Surry, UK: Ian Allen, 1981. ISBN 07110 1078 1.
External links
| Martin and Martin Marietta aircraft | |
|---|---|
| Model numbers | |
| Airliners | |
| Attack aircraft | |
| Bombers | |
| Maritime patrol | |
| Military transports | |
| Military trainers | |
| Scout/Torpedo bombers | |
| Reconnaissance aircraft | |
| Observation aircraft | |
| Martin Marietta | |
| USN/USMC torpedo aircraft designations pre-1962 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Torpedo |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Torpedo Bomber |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Torpedo Scout |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Patrol Torpedo Bomber |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Aviation lists | |
|---|---|
| General | |
| Military | |
| Accidents / incidents | |
| Records | |