Revision as of 15:05, 6 March 2006 editNickelShoe (talk | contribs)18,390 edits speedy delete← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:19, 6 March 2006 edit undoAlpha269 (talk | contribs)179 edits →[]: deleteNext edit → | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
*'''Speedy delete''' A7. --]]</font>]] 13:00, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | *'''Speedy delete''' A7. --]]</font>]] 13:00, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
*'''Speedy delete''' as not claiming notability. I should have put that tag on when I deprodded it as already deprodded, sorry for not paying closer attention. ] 15:05, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | *'''Speedy delete''' as not claiming notability. I should have put that tag on when I deprodded it as already deprodded, sorry for not paying closer attention. ] 15:05, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
*'''Delete''' per nom -- ] 15:19, 6 March 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:19, 6 March 2006
MEUA
Disputed prod. Prod was "not notable (fictional?) group, + is WP:NFT". Original author notes "Please dont delete this article.I will delete it in a week." Royal Blue 07:40, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, as per prod. I also find it hard to have good faith in the author puting it up for CSD G7. --Royal Blue 07:45, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete: A7. I see no assertion of notability for this self-proclaimed "fictional alliance." --Kinu /c 08:11, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete, A7. PJM 12:28, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as non-notable Edgar181 12:49, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete A7. --Terence Ong 13:00, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as not claiming notability. I should have put that tag on when I deprodded it as already deprodded, sorry for not paying closer attention. NickelShoe 15:05, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom -- Alpha269 15:19, 6 March 2006 (UTC)