| Revision as of 06:04, 8 March 2006 editNJZombie (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers30,603 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:59, 8 March 2006 edit undoMikeWazowski (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users33,732 edits Vandalism?Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == Vandalism? == | |||
| You've got to be kidding me... editing superfluous commas is NOT vandalism - and for the record, I'm a former newspaper editor, I know grammar and AP style, and I was CORRECTING your bad grammar. Here's a test for you - read something you wrote with all the commas - say, for example, your inaccurate summary on the ] page - put a nice pregnant pause in there every time you come upon one of your commas. Now unless you're trying to sound like William Shatner, it's awkward and definitely incorrect style. As for your claim I violated 3RR, there you're mistaken. I'm at three, which is why I've backed off for now - the earliest one you could claim was not a revert. ] 06:59, 8 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:59, 8 March 2006
Vandalism?
You've got to be kidding me... editing superfluous commas is NOT vandalism - and for the record, I'm a former newspaper editor, I know grammar and AP style, and I was CORRECTING your bad grammar. Here's a test for you - read something you wrote with all the commas - say, for example, your inaccurate summary on the Misplaced Pages:Vandalism in progress page - put a nice pregnant pause in there every time you come upon one of your commas. Now unless you're trying to sound like William Shatner, it's awkward and definitely incorrect style. As for your claim I violated 3RR, there you're mistaken. I'm at three, which is why I've backed off for now - the earliest one you could claim was not a revert. MikeWazowski 06:59, 8 March 2006 (UTC)