Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 20:33, 8 March 2006

Welcome

Hey there, Kalsermar. Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you enjoy being a Wikipedian and decide to stay! Here are a few good links for newcomers (or "oldcomers" for reference):

By the way, you should sign and date your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. Three tildes (~~~) produces just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!

Great, just what we need around this place... more people whose names can spell "Ram Lakers". Dumb Lakers. :) Cheers. --Lord Voldemort 19:53, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

Recent Deaths

Your arguments weren't bad at all, and you'd make an eloquent spokesperson for your view if the matter came to a vote. One thing I love about Misplaced Pages is that it defaults in favor of the inclusion of information, so while I would expect our positions to be split 50/50 in support, this would normally result in their being listed. Long before my time, this debate was had; besides my own views, another reason I oppose changing is the difficulty of revising the archives.

If it means anything, I do support the death penalty, though the way it is applied in Texas and Virginia scares me. I also support criminology, and think the dispassionate analysis of criminals is a useful social science; hence, I see their being cataloged at WP as a positive good. Best wishes, Xoloz 22:40, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Thank you for your comments. I enjoy the debate and respect everyone's views on the issue. Revising the archives would be problematic, I agree.--Kalsermar 16:52, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

DC streets

An AfD that you recently particpated in has been recycled. Please see Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of state-named Avenues in Washington, D.C. (second nomination). - brenneman 05:34, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Aaron Burr

Thank you! I suspect some yahoos are going to add it back in, but we can take turns reverting... Rklawton 18:29, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Your turn? Rklawton 16:52, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

I will keep an eye on the article but I am not always in a position to act quickly I'm afraid.--Kalsermar 19:53, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Steelbeard1 hasn't been able to address the issues discussed in the talk pages. He has request a "truce," but his version of a truce is to leave the edits his way. Rklawton 20:48, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Well, I'm not going to get involved in an edit war right now but I will revert it later or tomorrow probably. If he persists I may request comments on this and related issues. I will put up a message on his talk page as well.--Kalsermar 21:04, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Re: Appreciation

Thank you very much. I think we have very similar views, as I was just looking at some other comments you made on the olympic conventions page. Medalstats and Them medals seem to be not only expressing their views, but implimenting them as well, which is rude and rather sad. As long as we continue to bash our opponents outrageous views, I think we can draw in enough supporters to make for a "pro us" resolution of these debates. Keep up the good editing! --Jared / 23:40, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Sockpuppets

I would like to again bring to your attention the comment you left on the Misplaced Pages:Olympic conventions page. The three users: Medalstats, Them Medals, and Wintermedal, look quite suspicious of being the same person. Look at the user contribs of each one and note that each one is used on a specific date; Medalstats stops at the 24th, Them medals picks up on the 25th, and Winter medal is on the 26th. Look eerie to you too? If you're an admin, I suggest doing somjething about this, as I am not one myself. (I'd do it in a heartbeat.) Thanks. P.S. Notify me if you do anything. --Jared / 20:40, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

I'm not sure how you would do that. I'll see if I can find some way to report it and how bout you look for some evidence? --Jared / 20:49, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Ok, here's the template I should add to the user names: {{Sockpuppet|1=SOCKPUPPETEER|evidence=]}}. I will add it to all three of them if you think we have enough evidence. Thanks for the help. --Jared / 20:57, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Ok I started adding them to the talk and main user pages. the link to where the evidence is to go is posted on the template. --Jared / 21:07, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

I'm going to look for an admin to address this to. So these users will be taken care of fast. --Jared / 21:35, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

That's quite alright. Thanks for your help. I appreciate it. --Jared / 22:01, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

More evidence

Them medals: 03:55, February 25, 2006 (hist) (diff) Talk:Total Olympics medal count (support for medal count scores)

Wintermedal: 16:48, February 26, 2006 (hist) (diff) Misplaced Pages:Olympic conventions/topics (support for medal count scores)

Note the exact same edit summary... Something tells me there was someone before it, too, and I'll try to find out who it was.

Re: Antics

Thanks for the comment. That was a nice thing to say. Yeah, I've been trying to get rid of some of those "red links" too. TYhere's just so many you can do without getting bored, though. Haha. Anyway, I looked at your comment and I've decided that I will scratch the whole thing. Your logic is right and I want that page to turn out well. P.S. Yeah I contacted an admin who then blocked him. He was being very bothersome. haha, --Jared / 01:22, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Urgent!

King, please go to this page ASAP, as the Olympic conventions pages have been nominated for deletion! I trust that you like them a lot and from your edits, you are not willing to lose all of the work you put in. I urge you to vote "Keep", as 3 weeks of work are about to go down the drain! Thanks. (and tell other active contributors.) --Jared / 20:33, 8 March 2006 (UTC)