| Revision as of 15:37, 13 May 2011 editΔ (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers35,263 edits →What restrictions are in place?← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:42, 13 May 2011 edit undoCBM (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers55,390 edits →What restrictions are in place?: cNext edit → | ||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
| I've been looking over ], and note from the related discussion this was enacted three years ago. I know there are ] from ArbCom, but the community imposed restrictions? I can't find any evidence they are still active. If they're not active, when did they expire? I see a lot of people trying to criminalize you based on editing restrictions which I don't think are actually active. Thoughts? --] (]) 15:23, 13 May 2011 (UTC) | I've been looking over ], and note from the related discussion this was enacted three years ago. I know there are ] from ArbCom, but the community imposed restrictions? I can't find any evidence they are still active. If they're not active, when did they expire? I see a lot of people trying to criminalize you based on editing restrictions which I don't think are actually active. Thoughts? --] (]) 15:23, 13 May 2011 (UTC) | ||
| :I believe that to be incorrect. The community restrictions weren't time-limited; unless they were repealed or overriden by ArbCom, they should remain in effect. (I don't if it is wise to have time-unlimited restrictions without a central repository, but no one has ever accused the community of being wise.) Δ may, of course, remove this without comment, but it doesn't necessarily reflect facts. — ] ] 15:31, 13 May 2011 (UTC) | :I believe that to be incorrect. The community restrictions weren't time-limited; unless they were repealed or overriden by ArbCom, they should remain in effect. (I don't if it is wise to have time-unlimited restrictions without a central repository, but no one has ever accused the community of being wise.) Δ may, of course, remove this without comment, but it doesn't necessarily reflect facts. — ] ] 15:31, 13 May 2011 (UTC) | ||
| ::As someone who was involved with placing the original restrictions, I can also say they were not intended to be time limited. — Carl <small>(] · ])</small> 15:42, 13 May 2011 (UTC) | |||
| *I recall there being a date cap on at least one portion of those restrictions, but can't find it. That's what I was hoping to clarify. --] (]) 15:33, 13 May 2011 (UTC) | *I recall there being a date cap on at least one portion of those restrictions, but can't find it. That's what I was hoping to clarify. --] (]) 15:33, 13 May 2011 (UTC) | ||
| **Ive been planning a formal request for all the restrictions to be lifted. ] 15:37, 13 May 2011 (UTC) | **Ive been planning a formal request for all the restrictions to be lifted. ] 15:37, 13 May 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 15:42, 13 May 2011
Indonesian banknotes considered PD
It seems that Mr Anon has found the proverbial smoking gun, and that your proverbial goose is proverbially cooked. Please do share your opinion: Talk:Indonesian rupiah#Copyright status of Indonesian banknotes. Jpatokal (talk) 21:33, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
- again you are mistaken. ΔT 13:25, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
Congrats
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| For your efforts to keep the encyclopedia in tip-top shape. Cheers! —Eustress 00:01, 12 May 2011 (UTC) |
iamamiwhoami
Borderings (talk) 17:21, 12 May 2011 (UTC) Regarding iamamiwhoami: How do you think I can go about displaying about two-three pictures regarding the project? Most music videos typically have one screenshot, and iamamiwhoami's music videos are all combined in one wikipedia article. Additionally, the images used are also important in identifying the specific environment and person. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Borderings (talk • contribs) 17:21, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
- You cant. ΔT 02:04, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
So how do I go about doing something like this: http://en.wikipedia.org/File:LG_%26_B_telephone_MV_02.jpg without getting my images removed? Borderings (talk) 11:30, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
What restrictions are in place?
I've been looking over Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration/Betacommand_2#Community-imposed_restrictions, and note from the related discussion this was enacted three years ago. I know there are some restrictions still in place from ArbCom, but the community imposed restrictions? I can't find any evidence they are still active. If they're not active, when did they expire? I see a lot of people trying to criminalize you based on editing restrictions which I don't think are actually active. Thoughts? --Hammersoft (talk) 15:23, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
- I believe that to be incorrect. The community restrictions weren't time-limited; unless they were repealed or overriden by ArbCom, they should remain in effect. (I don't if it is wise to have time-unlimited restrictions without a central repository, but no one has ever accused the community of being wise.) Δ may, of course, remove this without comment, but it doesn't necessarily reflect facts. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 15:31, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
- As someone who was involved with placing the original restrictions, I can also say they were not intended to be time limited. — Carl (CBM · talk) 15:42, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
- I recall there being a date cap on at least one portion of those restrictions, but can't find it. That's what I was hoping to clarify. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:33, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
- Ive been planning a formal request for all the restrictions to be lifted. ΔT 15:37, 13 May 2011 (UTC)