| Revision as of 00:15, 24 May 2011 editRon Ritzman (talk | contribs)75,721 edits Relisting debate← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:40, 24 May 2011 edit undoBurntout123 (talk | contribs)372 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|T}} | {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|T}} | ||
| Deletion of this topic is clearly against freedom of science and paradigm shifting efforts and consistent with hostile bias. | |||
| :{{la|Burnt-out diabetes mellitus}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>) | :{{la|Burnt-out diabetes mellitus}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>) | ||
Revision as of 20:40, 24 May 2011
Burnt-out diabetes mellitus
Deletion of this topic is clearly against freedom of science and paradigm shifting efforts and consistent with hostile bias.
- Burnt-out diabetes mellitus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Concept not widely used, recently introduced but without clear description of notability. It is well known that people with diabetes whose renal function deteriorates need reduced insulin doses, and sometimes can completely discontinue treatment. The 2010 article did not introduce that concept. Delete. JFW | T@lk 21:28, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 12:44, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. The creators do not seem to be active in the article's improvement. Subject's notability is questionable, so if this cannot be established, then definitely send it down the tubes. – Paine Ellsworth ( CLIMAX ) 09:06, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:15, 24 May 2011 (UTC)