| Revision as of 00:54, 9 March 2006 editRobert McClenon (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers197,231 edits Request for Comments← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:21, 10 March 2006 edit undoMoby Dick~enwiki (talk | contribs)767 edits User:Cool Cat's "neutrality problems"Next edit → | ||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
| http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Aucaman | http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Aucaman | ||
| ] 00:54, 9 March 2006 (UTC) | ] 00:54, 9 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == ]'s "neutrality problems" == | |||
| see: ] | |||
| The rest of the case makes interesting reading. | |||
| --] 12:21, 10 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:21, 10 March 2006
This page is yours. Feel free to say whatever you want. Constructive feedbacks would be more than appreciated. --Aucaman 12:21, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
 Archives |
|---|
Persian Jews
About your edit: How is Iranian revolution a POV? --Kash 22:52, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
If it is not, then why is it mentioned in the article? all you did was change the heading! --Kash 01:52, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
Again, you seem to miss the point, the article is written for everyone to read, headings such as 1979 doesn't make sense, if it was just the Jews in Iran, and the article is about Persian Jews, it seems pretty relevant that Iranian revolution should be used as the heading of the related section. And whats more silly is that you have renamed it as a 'POV', I doubt any contributers who put that is a Jewish Persian (from Iran, or outside!) --Kash 02:02, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
Are Afghan Jews really relevant to Persian Jews? --Kash 02:29, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
Turkish people
I think the matter is resolved now, but thanks for your suggestion anyways. --Khoikhoi 06:28, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
Persian Jews
Yes, Zoroastrians are called Zarthosti in Persian. Stop reading so much into things and assume good faith. SouthernComfort 19:15, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- Why the antagonism to the sentence anyway? SouthernComfort 19:20, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- In the Persian language there are no terms in reference to Persian Jews specifically. In general, Jewish people are referred to by two common terms, kalimi, which is considered the most proper term, and yahudi, which is less formal. Don't you think that this is actually informative and relevant? SouthernComfort 19:21, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- Which part do you object to exactly? SouthernComfort 19:24, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- The whole thing doesn't make any sense. What's the reader supposed to take out from this? Aucaman 19:28, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- The article is about Persian Jews - it is meant to clarify that there is no Persian language equivalent for terms like "Persian Jew" or "Parsim" (which is included in the beginning). If you don't like that part and think it's obvious, you can remove it, but it's just atating a basic fact. The second part is simply providing the Persian language terms for Jewish people, and clarifying which term is more proper than the other, since the article is about Persian Jews, so why not include the Persian language terms for Jews as well? Why is that offensive to you? SouthernComfort 19:41, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
Request for Comments
A user conduct request for comments has been filed against you. Please read it and respond to it. http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Aucaman Robert McClenon 00:54, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
User:Cool Cat's "neutrality problems"
see: Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Coolcat, Davenbelle and Stereotek#POV editing by Coolcat
The rest of the case makes interesting reading.