| Revision as of 03:50, 5 June 2011 editTL36 (talk | contribs)586 edits →Why hasn't Cherie Roberts' page been deleted?← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:58, 5 June 2011 edit undoMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 72h) to User talk:Veinor/Archive 10.Next edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| April 2007 I added "trivia" that is factually true about the origin of PSA's logo airplane, which I created. I would like to suggest that the addition be reinserted, and that any info you feel is self-promoting can be left out. I am no longer an illustrator, and you have mistakenly presumed I am trying to promote my work. Not at all so. Just trying to relate the true history of the logo, and the connection to the film "Pursuit of happyness." <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> | April 2007 I added "trivia" that is factually true about the origin of PSA's logo airplane, which I created. I would like to suggest that the addition be reinserted, and that any info you feel is self-promoting can be left out. I am no longer an illustrator, and you have mistakenly presumed I am trying to promote my work. Not at all so. Just trying to relate the true history of the logo, and the connection to the film "Pursuit of happyness." <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> | ||
| == Jospeh Cao == | |||
| <s>Please stop undoing my attempt to remove vandalism from the Jospeh Cao article, thanks</s> ] (]) 04:42, 8 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :I got the diffs mixed up. This is what happens when I try to multitask and revert at the same time. ] ] 04:44, 8 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::No worries, good work on protecting the page] (]) 04:50, 8 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::I concur, good work. :)--]] 05:00, 8 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Undeletion of ] == | |||
| The article for Paul Uppal was deleted because it was decided that as a party political candidate he was a non notable person. It was you who oversaw the decision to delete the article. On May 6th 2010, Paul Uppal was elected MP for the British House of Commons parliamentary constituency of ]. I beleive this makes him a notable person and the decision to delete the article on Paul Uppal should be reviewed. ] (]) 09:18, 10 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
| I concur. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 22:28, 10 May 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == Deletion review for ] == | == Deletion review for ] == | ||
| Line 43: | Line 29: | ||
| :::Oh, it's counting the that I used to do. That'd do it. I don't think anything uses those anymore, so I should probably delete them. ] ] 22:10, 20 November 2010 (UTC) | :::Oh, it's counting the that I used to do. That'd do it. I don't think anything uses those anymore, so I should probably delete them. ] ] 22:10, 20 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
| ==MfD nomination of ]== | == MfD nomination of ] == | ||
| ], a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> ] | ] 09:17, 3 April 2011 (UTC) | ], a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> ] | ] 09:17, 3 April 2011 (UTC) | ||
| ==Why hasn't Cherie Roberts' page been deleted?== | == Why hasn't Cherie Roberts' page been deleted? == | ||
| Back on April 20, 2007, it was written that the result of the discussion about deleting the page was to delete and the name Veinor was by that. Obviously, that was over | Back on April 20, 2007, it was written that the result of the discussion about deleting the page was to delete and the name Veinor was by that. Obviously, that was over | ||
Revision as of 18:58, 5 June 2011
PSA Artwork
April 2007 I added "trivia" that is factually true about the origin of PSA's logo airplane, which I created. I would like to suggest that the addition be reinserted, and that any info you feel is self-promoting can be left out. I am no longer an illustrator, and you have mistakenly presumed I am trying to promote my work. Not at all so. Just trying to relate the true history of the logo, and the connection to the film "Pursuit of happyness." ~~~~
Deletion review for Paul Uppal
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Paul Uppal. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Jttw (talk) 18:38, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
Talk pages by size
Please see the new page Misplaced Pages:Database reports/Talk pages by size (to be updated weekly). This talk page ranks fifth, with 23252 kilobytes.
Perhaps this will motivate greater efficiency in the use of kilobytes.
—Wavelength (talk) 21:41, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
- What? Does this include archives or not? Because I have an incredibly difficult time believing that even with archives, my talk page takes up 23 megabytes. Veinor 21:44, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
- It probably does, but you might wish to ask at User talk:Svick.
- —Wavelength (talk) 22:04, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, it's counting the counts that I used to do. That'd do it. I don't think anything uses those anymore, so I should probably delete them. Veinor 22:10, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
- It probably does, but you might wish to ask at User talk:Svick.
MfD nomination of User:Davidcampaignteam/Iprex
User:Davidcampaignteam/Iprex, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/User:Davidcampaignteam/Iprex and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Davidcampaignteam/Iprex during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Flowanda | Talk 09:17, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
Why hasn't Cherie Roberts' page been deleted?
Back on April 20, 2007, it was written that the result of the discussion about deleting the page was to delete and the name Veinor was by that. Obviously, that was over four years ago and the page is still up. Incidentally, this Cherie Roberts' page is nothing but an advertisement and definitely should be deleted. Please let me know something.TL36 (talk) 03:50, 5 June 2011 (UTC)