| Revision as of 20:26, 9 June 2011 view sourceTreasuryTag (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users46,645 editsm This is the bit where I delete your message. Enjoy!← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:23, 10 June 2011 view source Tothwolf (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers10,326 edits →Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Marriage Guidance Counsellor: Canvassing at WP:VPPNext edit → | ||
| Line 126: | Line 126: | ||
| Please read ]. ] (]) 16:15, 9 June 2011 (UTC) | Please read ]. ] (]) 16:15, 9 June 2011 (UTC) | ||
| :Please read ], ], ] and ]. <font color="#A20846">╟─]]►]─╢</font> 16:48, 9 June 2011 (UTC) | :Please read ], ], ] and ]. <font color="#A20846">╟─]]►]─╢</font> 16:48, 9 June 2011 (UTC) | ||
| == Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Marriage Guidance Counsellor == | |||
| post to ] is considered ], specifically it is a form of campaigning. It does not matter that you did not include a link to the AfD itself, this still falls afoul of ] which specifically includes: ''"Soliciting support other than by posting direct messages, such as using a custom signature with a message promoting a specific position on any issue being discussed."'' Your technique isn't novel or a new idea. Please don't do this again. --] (]) 22:23, 10 June 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:23, 10 June 2011
|
TreasuryTag is currently, or is going to be, away from Misplaced Pages, between April 14 and April 19, 2009, and may not be able to respond immediately to queries. He may, however, edit a little unless he's using the splendid Wikibreak enforcer. |
My pontificality of prelates
Re:Judoon
It just didn't seem notable to me. They're mentioned in the synopsis as it is, and as opposed to the recurring characters that are mentioned in continuity (which, I feel, may be better left out of the plot synopsis) they are only linked to preious Judoon appearances by the species, not the plot or the specific Judoon seen. I won't contest a reversion though. U-Mos (talk) 18:15, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
Miliband
Hi, it seems ok now, I hope you agree, thank you for presenting the citations that asserted the notability of the addition. Regards. Off2riorob (talk) 20:20, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
- Good work, both of you. --Dweller (talk) 20:29, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks to both :) ╟─TreasuryTag►sundries─╢ 20:58, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 6 June 2011
- Board elections: Time to vote
- News and notes: Board resolution on controversial content; WMF Summer of Research; indigenous workshop; brief news
- Recent research: Various metrics of quality and trust; leadership; nerd stereotypes
- WikiProject report: Make your own book with Wikiproject Misplaced Pages-Books
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Two cases pending resolution; temporary desysop; dashes/hyphens update
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Would you believe
in my day to day life, I use the word "moron" freely and meant with out (much) malice? It's a bad habit picked up from a lecturer. I'll cool it on here.~Zythe 23:54, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks. I think that would be best! ╟─TreasuryTag►hemicycle─╢ 07:18, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
Alternate account
Please verify that user:Treasurytag is an alternate account of yours and not an impersonation. Thanks - My76Strat 14:46, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
- Nope, it is indeed an impersonation account I'm afraid: second this week. ╟─TreasuryTag►Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster─╢ 14:47, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
People should note that I have just created TreasuryTagg (talk · contribs) with a scrambled password, since that seems to be one likely future guise my 'new friend' may attempt. ╟─TreasuryTag►Regent─╢ 14:53, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
The Cheshire Unicorn
Please read WP:BITE. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:15, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
- Please read WP:SPAM, WP:NPOV, WP:COPYVIO and WP:CSD. ╟─TreasuryTag►Regional Counting Officer─╢ 16:48, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Marriage Guidance Counsellor
This post to WP:VPP is considered canvassing, specifically it is a form of campaigning. It does not matter that you did not include a link to the AfD itself, this still falls afoul of Misplaced Pages:Canvassing#Inappropriate notification which specifically includes: "Soliciting support other than by posting direct messages, such as using a custom signature with a message promoting a specific position on any issue being discussed." Your technique isn't novel or a new idea. Please don't do this again. --Tothwolf (talk) 22:23, 10 June 2011 (UTC)