Revision as of 12:16, 17 February 2011 editMeno25 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators215,990 edits rate← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:54, 12 June 2011 edit undoCommonsNotificationBot (talk | contribs)Bots54,096 editsm Notification of possible deletion of File:EtisalatAbuDhabi.jpg (Version r79)Next edit → | ||
Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
is that appropriate for a wikipedia article? ] (]) 21:15, 20 September 2008 (UTC) | is that appropriate for a wikipedia article? ] (]) 21:15, 20 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
==File:EtisalatAbuDhabi.jpg Nominated for Deletion== | |||
{| | |||
|- | |||
| ] | |||
| An image used in this article, ], has been nominated for deletion at ] for the following reason: ''Deletion requests June 2011'' | |||
;What should I do? | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
| A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (] has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. | |||
''This notification is provided by a Bot'' --] (]) 14:54, 12 June 2011 (UTC) | |||
|} |
Revision as of 14:54, 12 June 2011
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Etisalat article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Vandalism
This article has been completely replaced with a new one, as I'm noticing on Saturday, April 21, 2007. Looks like someone at Etisalat has completely replaced the entry with a press release from themselves? Antivert 01:20, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Hmm, it appears much of the article was removed due to violation of certain policies, and much of this Etisalat-aggrandizing information was added later. Time to clean up the article I guess, and provide new links with sources for the censorship-related stuff. Antivert 01:20, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Sigh! Corporate vandalism is so fun. Antivert 01:28, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, I have to edit here one more time just to show how crass this is:
- http://hrw.org/advocacy/internet/mena/uae.htm (Human Rights Watch on Etisalat and Free Expression)
was changed to:
- http://www.weyak.ae (Etisalat’s entertainment portal)
There were numerous problems with NOR in the Censorship section before. Much of it is verifiably true if you live in the UAE, but lacked credible sources. I'm not restoring the section because it should be rewritten. Antivert 02:04, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
There also used to be a link to the website of the service they use to determine what sites they block. Its an American company that sells a list of categorized sites. Does anyone have that link or remember the name ?
Unfortunately, the whole page does still seem to read more like an advertisement for Etisalat than an objective article. Huw Thomas ITSI Middle East - 28 Aug 08 202.174.156.68 (talk) 06:01, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
EIM
(GMT+4)
Removed this: Upon the new release of the latest ISP for the United Arab Emirates will allow the complete unblocking of every internet site on the planet.
There's been no announcement as to whether DU, the 'new' ISP, will operate a proxy-free system. Conversely, it's been reported that those areas that currently don't operate through the Etisalat proxy (freezones, EMAAR residential areas, etc) will, in fact, have it imposed before the year-end.
Verification needed
There might be a third ISP but will be partially owned by etisalat.The facts are unknown if they will restrict the internet or not OR the ISP will come in service. If it does, The ISP will be up and running By December 2006.
- Interesting and important article. I wonder what is meant by the "weasle word" reference in the end of the article. It seems like that would be an easy one to edit and get that cleaned up. VX 20:16, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
Controversial Company
Removed many sections of the entry due to failure to comply with Misplaced Pages rules. If you're unsure of the rules, please visit: http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Policies_and_guidelines . We all know that Etisalat is doing some pretty devious things, but let's please adhere to Misplaced Pages's policies. Antivert
There are also several problems with NPOV in this article. Please be encylopaedic.
Cable TV?
"citation needed" added for the statement that Etisalat holds a monopoly in the cable TV field. This needs to be clarified, as there are multiple cable TV operators in the UAE, including Dubai.
Old Information
The article contains very old information and it is not up to date. Please help updating the article
Reliable? Yeah Right!
Look, i've been to UAE, and reliable does not come to mind to most customers of Etisalat. This is the first time i have heard anybody saying this about Etisalat. Nabeel_co 04:14, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
Blocked sites
Why was the section on blocked sites removed?--SohanDsouza 20:48, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
- It was removed without comment, and so was the see also section, mentioning their non-blocking competition, du (telco). I am about to restore the content removed without explanation. Thanks for the catch, SohanDsouza. —Fudoreaper 21:11, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
- This section needs to attribute the new role of TRA that is actually managing the proxy right now. TRA is also mandating a proxy for du, although they face stiff resistance and obstacles from du officials. They've claimed so far all sorts of technical obstacles :-) --V3rbum (talk) 07:41, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Etisalatblock.gif
Image:Etisalatblock.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Misplaced Pages article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 08:14, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Resource
is a good resource for documenting censorship by Etisalat. Superm401 - Talk 21:00, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Criticism?
With regard to these points:
- With a 1Mbit connection the download speed can be as high as 120Kbytes and the upload speed will be around 13Kbytes, If you pay for a 2Mbits connection, the speed can be as high as approx. 250KBytes/s and upload speed as high as 35kB/s. 4Mbits connection gives you double the download transfer rate at approx. 430KBytes/s, but the upload speed will not go higher than 55kB/s.
- Connection to most servers around the world won't give you the 430kB/s (4Mb) download speed.
This sounds fairly comparable for ADSL connections around the world. Don't think this is specificly only to do with Etisalat. I nominate for removal - 129.11.208.16 (talk) 13:27, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
Prayer in this article?
"This tradition is not from the time of the Prophet -peace be upon him- or his Sahabah."
is that appropriate for a wikipedia article? 169.252.4.21 (talk) 21:15, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
File:EtisalatAbuDhabi.jpg Nominated for Deletion
An image used in this article, File:EtisalatAbuDhabi.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Deletion requests June 2011
| |
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:54, 12 June 2011 (UTC) |
- All unassessed articles
- B-Class company articles
- Mid-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- B-Class Telecommunications articles
- Mid-importance Telecommunications articles
- B-Class Egypt articles
- Low-importance Egypt articles
- WikiProject Egypt articles
- B-Class United Arab Emirates articles
- Mid-importance United Arab Emirates articles
- B-Class Abu Dhabi articles
- Mid-importance Abu Dhabi articles
- WikiProject Abu Dhabi articles
- B-Class Dubai articles
- Mid-importance Dubai articles
- WikiProject Dubai articles
- WikiProject United Arab Emirates articles