| Revision as of 08:01, 12 March 2006 editVanished user 19794758563875 (talk | contribs)17,339 edits →New Requests← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:04, 12 March 2006 edit undoVanished user 19794758563875 (talk | contribs)17,339 edits →Other steps in [] that have been attempted:Next edit → | ||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
| ===Other steps in ] that have been attempted:=== | ===Other steps in ] that have been attempted:=== | ||
| *] | *] | ||
| *Extended discussions at the talk page, with repeated request to join the discussions to find consensus. | |||
| *Limited 'discussion' at user talk pages. | |||
| *] under ''Advise needed''. | *] under ''Advise needed''. | ||
| <!-- If an RfC was filed, provide a link. If the issue was raised on the Administrators Noticeboard or other similar page, provide a stable link (one that links to a revision in the history that contains the full text of the discussion). If informal dispute resolution, such as ], were attempted, provide links. Do not provide links to discussions on the article's talk page(s), or to discussions on user talk pages. --> | <!-- If an RfC was filed, provide a link. If the issue was raised on the Administrators Noticeboard or other similar page, provide a stable link (one that links to a revision in the history that contains the full text of the discussion). If informal dispute resolution, such as ], were attempted, provide links. Do not provide links to discussions on the article's talk page(s), or to discussions on user talk pages. --> | ||
Revision as of 08:04, 12 March 2006
|
due to a shortage of available mediators and an increased number of requests. New requests will be accepted and assigned as mediators become available. Parties should be aware that there may be a significant delay in having a mediator assigned. Individuals interested in joining the committee should see the Committee page. |
Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/Rfm-header
New Requests
New requests should be listed at the top of this section, right below this message. All requests must use the {{RFMR}} template. Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/Guide provides an explaination for how to file a request; Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/Sample shows the template with instructions. All parties to the mediation must indicate agreement to mediate by signing the "Parties' agreement to mediate" section; any request that has not been signed by all parties within 7 days will be rejected. A description of common reasons for rejecting requests is available at Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/Common Reasons for Rejection.
Important note: Any request that fails to include all the information required by the {{RFMR}} format will be delisted immediately. Any request that includes additional information, particularly commentary, will have the additional information removed. Parties should adhere to the format strictly.
Natural selection
Involved parties
- Marcosantezana (talk · contribs)
- KimvdLinde (talk · contribs)
Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request:
- Article talk pages:
- User talk pages:
Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:
- WP:RFC
- Extended discussions at the talk page, with repeated request to join the discussions to find consensus.
- Limited 'discussion' at user talk pages.
- WP:AN under Advise needed.
Issues to be mediated
- General outline of the article.
Additional issues to be mediated
- None
Parties' agreement to mediate
- All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected.
- Agree. KimvdLinde 08:01, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
- Agree. ~~~~
- Do not agree. ~~~~
Decision of the Mediation Committee
- Accept/Reject/Extend:
- For the Mediation Committee, ~~~~
NiMUD and Online Creation
Involved Parties
- Ehheh (talk · contribs)
- Atari2600tim (talk · contribs)
- jlambert (talk · contribs)
- 68.162.128.9 22:06, 11 March 2006 (UTC), acting on behalf of Young_Zaphod (talk · contribs)
Comment: I've blocked 68. for incivility; see the talk page. 68. appears to have filed this somewhat incompetently on the other users talk pages. And it seems likely that 68. is a sock of YZ. However, it is certainly true that NiMUD and OC could use someone prepared to talk things through with the various parties William M. Connolley 23:15, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
Please see Misplaced Pages:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2006-01-24_Online_Creation and Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_mediation/Rejected_2#NiMUD_article_and_online_creation_article. Checkuser showed that Eggster in those cases and Young Zaphod here are probably the same person. I'd still be in favor of giving mediation a go, though. (Please feel free to move my comment if/when the proper request template is used) Ehheh 00:03, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
User who made the request can't be bothered with reading any of the WP policies, let alone following them. He didn't even make this request correctly. Much of his activity is described at Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_comment/Young_Zaphod and Category:Misplaced Pages:Suspected_sockpuppets_of_Young_Zaphod. He didn't bother with discussing any of his edits with the mediation cabal when it came up, and even accused the volunteer of being somebody's sock puppet (see Misplaced Pages:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2006-01-24_Online_Creation; I looked at his contributions, and the volunteer has many legit edits, and has made no edits regarding the subject at hand, and appears to not be anybody's sock puppet as far as I could tell). Basically, he has a history of making complaints to admin without following any of the associated procedures, and just wastes peoples' time in general. I agree with William and think that the two articles are pretty low quality, and that they won't get any better while Young_Zaphod/Eggster is editing them, however, I don't think that he's ready to cooperate with mediation, should he ever make his request correctly. So, I don't want to waste the time of mediators right now, but if he shows signs of changing his ways (and thus showing signs that he'd sincerely go along with mediation), then I'll agree to be involved with a mediation after he's cooled off and everything to the point where he won't be wasting the time of outsiders. Atari2600tim (talk • contribs) 01:33, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
Machsom Watch
Involved parties
- Zero0000 (talk · contribs)
- Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg (talk · contribs)
- Ynhockey (talk · contribs)
- Zeq (talk · contribs)
- Babajobu (talk · contribs)
- Pecher (talk · contribs)
- Heptor (talk · contribs)
Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request:
- Article talk pages:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk%3AMachsom_Watch&diff=42934024&oldid=42923140
- User talk pages:
Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:
Discussions on article talk page and requestes on user talk page.
Issues to be mediated
- NPOV policy 1: Should the article 1st paragrpah contain both POVs on the issue of Human Rights (as it has to do with Checkpoints and the broader issues of human rights to both Palestinians and Israelis) ?
- NPOV policy 2: Should the contraversy be Described ?
- NPOV policy 3: Are quotes from the oragnization own web site should be a source for Misplaced Pages article ?
Additional issues to be mediated
- To be completed
Parties' agreement to mediate
- All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected.
- Agree. ] 07:36, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
- Agree -Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg | Talk 07:48, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
- Agree. Pecher 17:18, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
- Agree. -- Y Ynhockey Y 17:37, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
Sorry, not interested in participating. I once restored some information Zero removed, but it seems that it is back into the article now, even with better wording. As long as he agrees not to remove information again, I'll skip this one. -- Heptor talk 23:16, 9 March 2006 (UTC)I read the discussion and reconsidered. I agree to participate in mediation (To make it clear: I was originally not interested in the article alltogether, not just the mediation part. After reading the talk page, I now think it is worth while anyway) -- Heptor talk 23:24, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
Decision of the Mediation Committee
- Note: As with the above mediation, the previous state of the issues section was unacceptable. Issues must be presented in a bulleted list, without commentary or accusations. The section must be completed in the correct format or the request will be rejected. Essjay 11:44, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
Al-Sarafand
Involved parties
- Zero0000 (talk · contribs)
- banned user Alberuni (talk · contribs) who helped zero using anon IP 68.214.35.104
- Zeq (talk · contribs)
User Ramallite was involved but not directly since he was actually a fair 3rd party that asked questions about my edits and received answers after which he did not change the article. I assume that if he still have doubts about accuracy we will hear from him.
- Article talk pages:
- User talk pages:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk%3AZero0000&diff=42934322&oldid=42934214
Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:
The issue is small and simple. So the steps taken are:
- Review by 3rd party (who asked very good questions about the sources provided)
- Requests (to Zero) that he:
- Avoid reverts and edit wars
- Discuss each of his reverts in talk page of article. ( this is realy a cardinal request, as zero ignore talk too often when he reverts )
- Do not remove relavant sourced content based on judicial process
- Adheer to NPOV policy
Issues to be mediated
- Should the article contain both version about the issue i.e Only the one from the Islamic movment prepective or also to add the fact from the judicial comitee who investigated the issue.
Additional issues to be mediated
- Additional issue 1
- Additional issue 2
Parties' agreement to mediate
- All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected.
- Agree. ] 07:35, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
Decision of the Mediation Committee
- Note: The previous state of the issues section was unacceptable. Issues must be presented in a bulleted list, without commentary or accusations. The section must be completed in the correct format or the request will be rejected. Essjay 11:44, 9 March 2006 (UTC)