Revision as of 05:48, 14 June 2008 editTyciol (talk | contribs)15,625 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:20, 30 June 2011 edit undoMasorick (talk | contribs)89 edits →Presented flag ratioNext edit → | ||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==Presented flag ratio== | ==Presented flag ratio== | ||
Is this meant to represent the amount of bisexuals in the population being a minority or something? If this were the case, then the heterosexual part of the flag should be bigger than the homosexual one to indicate their status as a majority as well. Actually, I think the majority of it should be purple and the top and bottom small. This does not indicate bisexual predominance, but rather it as a cutaway of a representation whose upper and lower limits need not be defined. ] (]) 05:48, 14 June 2008 (UTC) | Is this meant to represent the amount of bisexuals in the population being a minority or something? If this were the case, then the heterosexual part of the flag should be bigger than the homosexual one to indicate their status as a majority as well. Actually, I think the majority of it should be purple and the top and bottom small. This does not indicate bisexual predominance, but rather it as a cutaway of a representation whose upper and lower limits need not be defined. ] (]) 05:48, 14 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
:I read somewhere it's meant to represent the fact that bisexuals lack visibility compared to homosexuals and heterosexuals, but I'm not sure it was what the original designers intended. | |||
:] (]) 20:20, 30 June 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:20, 30 June 2011
LGBTQ+ studies Start‑class | |||||||
|
Heraldry and vexillology Stub‑class | |||||||
|
Presented flag ratio
Is this meant to represent the amount of bisexuals in the population being a minority or something? If this were the case, then the heterosexual part of the flag should be bigger than the homosexual one to indicate their status as a majority as well. Actually, I think the majority of it should be purple and the top and bottom small. This does not indicate bisexual predominance, but rather it as a cutaway of a representation whose upper and lower limits need not be defined. Tyciol (talk) 05:48, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
- I read somewhere it's meant to represent the fact that bisexuals lack visibility compared to homosexuals and heterosexuals, but I'm not sure it was what the original designers intended.
- Masorick (talk) 20:20, 30 June 2011 (UTC)