| Revision as of 23:45, 30 June 2004 editGrunt (talk | contribs)8,638 edits / *msg: */ - +note about disuse of msg: tag← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:00, 1 July 2004 edit undoFrazzydee (talk | contribs)Administrators8,294 edits *modifying post for READABILITY*Next edit → | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
| == msg: == | == msg: == | ||
| The msg: tag for templates is deprecated; please use {{delete}} or similar instead, which works equally well. Thanks for your continued effort :) -- ] ] 23:45, 2004 Jun 30 (UTC) | The msg: tag for templates is deprecated; please use <nowiki>{{delete}}</nowiki> or similar instead, which works equally well. Thanks for your continued effort :) -- ] ] 23:45, 2004 Jun 30 (UTC) | ||
| :Please note that I have modified the above user's post for readability purposes by adding the <nowiki><nowiki> and </nowiki> tags around {delete}</nowiki> | |||
Revision as of 00:00, 1 July 2004
Hi, here's my talk page. Feel free to put anything you want here. If it's here, then you can probably assume that I've seen it (I will probably not clear my talk page for a while). Thanks in advance for leaving a message!.
Sorry about redirecting your page. I know it's frustrating to create a page only to find it's a duplicate of something that already exists... maybe you'd like to check over the page it now redirects to to see if there's any info that could be merged in... Evercat 02:24, 11 Nov 2003 (UTC)
Cleanup
When you clean up a page that is on Cleanup, please remove it from the cleanup page. Otherwise, the cleanup page will become even more massive than it already is. — Braaropolis | Talk 00:10, 2 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- Oops- sorry. Just thought that the article may need a bit more work- but you're right that I should've removed it. I'll remember that for next time. -Frazzydee 01:44, 2 Jun 2004 (UTC)
FOX affiliates
There was no link for anything else, so I started List of Fox affiliates a while ago. Can you merge these? Mike H 17:54, Jun 25, 2004 (UTC)
- done :) -Frazzydee 20:37, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Cleanup
Been deleting from the Cleanup page, generally. When I don't, it's because I believe that my cleaning isn't definitive and that others might still need to take a whack. CU has been getting truly massive lately, sure enough, though. Either people are being more dilligent in sending articles there, or worse writing is going on. As WP gets more popular, I think the latter is going to be the case. Geogre 01:48, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- The above message was a response to the following: "Hi Geogre. Thanks a lot for helping to fix articles on the cleanup page! However, it would be really great if you could delete the entries on the cleanup page- just to help keep it as small as possible. Just a friendly reminder, so please don't take it as an insult or anything :) -Frazzydee 23:10, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)"
Speedy deletions
Thanks for spotting them. One has been a repeating vandal and had others that needed to be cleared. - Tεxτurε 19:45, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- The above message was a response to the following: "Hi. I just wanted to thank you for swiftly deleting both of my entries on the speedy deletions page :). It's good to know that there are admins patrolling -Frazzydee 19:35, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)"
Lol, the page looks great! Kudos.
msg:
The msg: tag for templates is deprecated; please use {{delete}} or similar instead, which works equally well. Thanks for your continued effort :) -- Grunt (talk) 23:45, 2004 Jun 30 (UTC)
- Please note that I have modified the above user's post for readability purposes by adding the <nowiki> and tags around {delete}</nowiki>