| Revision as of 15:25, 11 July 2011 editMathsci (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers66,107 edits Undid revision 438922516 by 212.183.140.7 (talk) rv Ipsock of Mikemikev← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:32, 11 July 2011 edit undo212.183.140.7 (talk) Undid revision 438922693 by Mathsci (talk) SPI first pleaseNext edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| If you feel that this report has been made in error, please reply as soon as possible on the ]. However, before contesting an Edit warring report, please review the respective policies to ensure you are not in violation of them. | If you feel that this report has been made in error, please reply as soon as possible on the ]. However, before contesting an Edit warring report, please review the respective policies to ensure you are not in violation of them. | ||
| ~ ] <small>(])</small> 05:58, 11 July 2011 (UTC) <small>(False positive? ])</small> <!-- Template: User:NekoBot/3RRAttn --> | ~ ] <small>(])</small> 05:58, 11 July 2011 (UTC) <small>(False positive? ])</small> <!-- Template: User:NekoBot/3RRAttn --> | ||
| == Advice == | |||
| You need to know that you are not going to win this. Arbcomm has decided to favor a particular line on R&I and denote all other lines as being racist. Promoting the unfavored line thus becomes a matter of conduct not content, and so reasoned argument is beside the point. There are a number of editors whose addiction to wiki-drama is tolerated in order to enforce the party line. Sooner or later you will do, or be provoked into, something which can be construed as contrary to policy and hence you can be sanctioned without further ado. Once you are associated with a banned user, you will be reverted on sight. So much easier than discussing the nuances of these complex and controversial matters. ] (]) 08:33, 11 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :See what I mean? ] (]) 15:24, 11 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:32, 11 July 2011
/Archive 1 /Archive 2 /Archive 3
Notification of WP:AN/EW report
Hello Miradre,
This is an automated friendly notification to inform you that you have been reported for Violation of the Edit warring policy at the Administrators' noticeboard.
If you feel that this report has been made in error, please reply as soon as possible on the noticeboard. However, before contesting an Edit warring report, please review the respective policies to ensure you are not in violation of them.
~ NekoBot (MeowTalk) 05:58, 11 July 2011 (UTC) (False positive? Report it!)
Advice
You need to know that you are not going to win this. Arbcomm has decided to favor a particular line on R&I and denote all other lines as being racist. Promoting the unfavored line thus becomes a matter of conduct not content, and so reasoned argument is beside the point. There are a number of editors whose addiction to wiki-drama is tolerated in order to enforce the party line. Sooner or later you will do, or be provoked into, something which can be construed as contrary to policy and hence you can be sanctioned without further ado. Once you are associated with a banned user, you will be reverted on sight. So much easier than discussing the nuances of these complex and controversial matters. 212.183.140.7 (talk) 08:33, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
- See what I mean? 212.183.140.7 (talk) 15:24, 11 July 2011 (UTC)