Revision as of 14:10, 22 July 2011 editMyMoloboaccount (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users12,431 edits →Notification: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:47, 23 July 2011 edit undoNuclearWarfare (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators83,665 edits You have been blocked from editing for violating an arbitration decision with your edits on German resistance. (TW)Next edit → | ||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
--] (]) 14:10, 22 July 2011 (UTC) | --] (]) 14:10, 22 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
== July 2011 == | |||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] To enforce an ] decision, you have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''1 week'''. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the ] and follow the instructions there to appeal your block. '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 20:47, 23 July 2011 (UTC) <hr/><p><small>'''Notice to administrators:''' In a <span class="plainlinks"></span>, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as ] or ]). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the ]. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."</small></div><!-- Template:uw-aeblock --> |
Revision as of 20:47, 23 July 2011
Archives |
User talk:Matthead/Archive2006 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
Did you know & Signpost
15 January 2025 |
|
- ... that one 18th-century reader was so offended by some chapters of Laurence Sterne's 1768 novel A Sentimental Journey Through France and Italy (scene pictured) that they glued the pages shut?
- ... that only two people are known to have seen Du Toit's torrent frog alive?
- ... that Jeanne Trevor's name was misspelled on the cover of her first album?
- ... that the Sitaleshwar Temple remained a place of worship even when it was in ruins?
- ... that the comet C/1975 T2 (Suzuki–Saigusa–Mori) was independently discovered by five observers within the span of half an hour?
- ... that viewers of an Indiana TV station's newscast in 1995 could send emails to the presenter live on air?
- ... that the diary of Erich Lassota von Steblau is an important primary source on the 16th-century Zaporozhian Cossacks of Ukraine?
- ... that nearly half of the wins achieved in 2024 by the San Jose State Spartans women's volleyball team were by forfeit?
- ... that Japan's oldest expressway is intended to be transformed into a park?
A Gem
Hi, Matthead! How are you doing?
Send me (spacecadet123@inorbit.com) your email, I've got a couple of scans I want to share with you. No wars, no arguments, no points to make - just a couple of WIKI colleagues sharing interesting stuff. Space Cadet (talk) 19:35, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Notification
You violated your topic ban: --MyMoloboaccount (talk) 14:10, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
July 2011
To enforce an arbitration decision, you have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks and follow the instructions there to appeal your block. NW (Talk) 20:47, 23 July 2011 (UTC)Notice to administrators: In a March 2010 decision, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."