Revision as of 22:41, 25 July 2011 editArbitrarily0 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators25,138 edits →Requested move: closed as moved← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:00, 26 July 2011 edit undoInnotata (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers43,065 edits →further rename request: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
''This notification is provided by a Bot'' --] (]) 12:37, 20 July 2011 (UTC) | ''This notification is provided by a Bot'' --] (]) 12:37, 20 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
|} | |} | ||
== further rename request == | |||
{{Requested move/dated|Stenodus}} | |||
] → {{no redirect|1=Stenodus}} – Per ], only the genus name should be used for monotypic ] (those with only one species), and the taxonomy used now at least gives ''Stenodus'' as monotypic. —] 02:00, 26 July 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:00, 26 July 2011
Fishes Start‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Etymology
The name almost certainly comes from French: "inconnu" = "unknown". The Jade Knight (talk) 06:53, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Move request
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Arbitrarily0 22:41, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
Inconnu → Stenodus leucichthys — The fish has several English names, of which inconnu is not the primary FishBase or FAO name. Olaff (talk) 09:04, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
- Support "Inconnu" should be a disambiguation page. 65.93.15.213 (talk) 04:16, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
- Support yes, unless someone can show that "sheefish" or another name is the primary one. Suppose "inconnu" should be a disambiguation, though the other topics with articles are all partial matches and less significant even than the fish. —innotata 15:11, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Stenodus leucichthys nelma.jpg Nominated for Deletion
An image used in this article, File:Stenodus leucichthys nelma.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests July 2011
| |
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:37, 20 July 2011 (UTC) |
further rename request
It has been proposed in this section that Stenodus leucichthys be renamed and moved to Stenodus. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. Links: current log • target log • direct move |
Stenodus leucichthys → Stenodus – Per Misplaced Pages:Naming conventions (fauna), only the genus name should be used for monotypic genera (those with only one species), and the taxonomy used now at least gives Stenodus as monotypic. —innotata 02:00, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
Categories: