| Revision as of 16:47, 27 July 2011 editCailil (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,119 editsm →question← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:08, 27 July 2011 edit undoHersfold (talk | contribs)33,142 edits awaiting replyNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' '''indefinitely''' from editing for For breaching guidelines on wikipedia's policy of conflict of interest breaching WP:OUTING. If you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the ] first. ] <sup>]</sup> 12:12, 26 July 2011 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block --> | <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' '''indefinitely''' from editing for For breaching guidelines on wikipedia's policy of conflict of interest breaching WP:OUTING. If you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the ] first. ] <sup>]</sup> 12:12, 26 July 2011 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block --> | ||
| {{unblock|reason=I see now that what I did violates the rules and I apologize as I was not aware accusing somebody of editing their own article was not allowed.}}, | {{unblock reviewed|reason=I see now that what I did violates the rules and I apologize as I was not aware accusing somebody of editing their own article was not allowed.|decline=Awaiting reply to Cailil's question below. Please post a new unblock request with your response. This isn't exactly a refusal to unblock you, I'm just removing this to clear the backlog since we're waiting for your reply anyway. ] <sup>(]/]/])</sup> 19:08, 27 July 2011 (UTC)}}, | ||
| :It's not "permanent", it's indefinite. You'll need to convice someone that the block is no longer needed to prevent further problems. Your statement above, along with the "IAR" paragraph at the top of the page, do little to convince. (''Note: statement above was altered by DegenFarang after this comment''). ] ] 16:07, 26 July 2011 (UTC) | :It's not "permanent", it's indefinite. You'll need to convice someone that the block is no longer needed to prevent further problems. Your statement above, along with the "IAR" paragraph at the top of the page, do little to convince. (''Note: statement above was altered by DegenFarang after this comment''). ] ] 16:07, 26 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
| ::Alright I removed the IAR section. I see now that I broke a rule in saying what I said. I was not aware at the time this was a rule. I apologize for doing it and will not do it again. I request that the block be removed. ] (]) 16:26, 26 July 2011 (UTC) | ::Alright I removed the IAR section. I see now that I broke a rule in saying what I said. I was not aware at the time this was a rule. I apologize for doing it and will not do it again. I request that the block be removed. ] (]) 16:26, 26 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 19:08, 27 July 2011
July 2011
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Cailil 12:12, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
DegenFarang (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I see now that what I did violates the rules and I apologize as I was not aware accusing somebody of editing their own article was not allowed.
Decline reason:
Awaiting reply to Cailil's question below. Please post a new unblock request with your response. This isn't exactly a refusal to unblock you, I'm just removing this to clear the backlog since we're waiting for your reply anyway. Hersfold 19:08, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
,
- It's not "permanent", it's indefinite. You'll need to convice someone that the block is no longer needed to prevent further problems. Your statement above, along with the "IAR" paragraph at the top of the page, do little to convince. (Note: statement above was altered by DegenFarang after this comment). Kuru (talk) 16:07, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
- Alright I removed the IAR section. I see now that I broke a rule in saying what I said. I was not aware at the time this was a rule. I apologize for doing it and will not do it again. I request that the block be removed. DegenFarang (talk) 16:26, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
question
User:DegenFarang back in January 2010 I warned you for disruptive editing in relation to Poker BLPs as did Vassyana. This instance (on the 26th of July) shows a repeat and escalation of that behaviour. If we are to unblock you, how will you adjust your behaviour on wikipedia to come into line with with all of our core policies and guidelines for content & behaviour?--Cailil 16:39, 27 July 2011 (UTC)