Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 10:02, 31 July 2011

The sanity of this user is disputed. There. You don't believe me? Well, look at the rest of the page...

Template:Scrubmouse

Your note

Hi there Boolyme, I would recommend talking to the admin who originally declined your request. I don't think it would be a good idea (for either of us) if I were to approve your request only three or four days after it was declined. Best. Acalamari 16:37, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

It would depend: I noticed that vandalism and a block were mentioned as reasons for declining your request. If you do good work (edit articles!) for a week, maybe two, you may not even need to wait for a month before requesting again. Acalamari 16:49, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

• Thank you. :) Acalamari 18:54, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

January 2011

Your addition to File:Patnaganges.jpg has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Misplaced Pages without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Misplaced Pages takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Fut.Perf. ☼ 18:18, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Template:Sandbox has been reverted, as it removed all content from the page without explanation. Please do not do this, as it is considered vandalism; use the sandbox for testing. If you think the page should be deleted, see here for what to do. Thank you.  Hazard-SJ  ±  18:43, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Reviewer permission

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Misplaced Pages:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:49, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

S'alright.

The main reason I reverted the other guy is he messed up the file link. If it's copyvio as well, so be it. Sort of odd it'd be here for five years without someone grabbing it, but I suppose the place has an assload of pics, too. HalfShadow 21:25, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Patna

Hi. I'd agree that the article talk page is the best place to discuss topics, and will do so there. I'll see if I can find some advice on the best way to describe hotels restaurants etc in a more neutral way - this was the problem with the article as I saw it. AndyTheGrump (talk) 23:02, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Since you have chosen to place a WP:3RR template on my talk page, rather than discussing the issue properly, I will no longer be willing to discuss the edits until you can tell me whether the edits by IP 192.17.199.95 were also made by you - if so (as I suspect), it is clearly you that is edit-warring. AndyTheGrump (talk) 23:08, 5 February 2011 (UTC) AndyTheGrump (talk) 23:09, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Ignore that too: but I will be seeking advice on the article. AndyTheGrump (talk) 23:09, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs Patna Women's College Subramanyam Bharti Award Patna division Mata Gujri Ganga Sharan Singh Award Nadwan, Patna Jungle A.N. Sinha Institute of Social Studies Patna Film Festival Pothuluri Veerabrahmam Patna Museum Sterling Knight Dr. George Grierson Award Sarvepalli Gopal Kalika Mata Temple, Chittorgarh Fort Patna College Lallan Prasad Singh Anusha Dandekar Padmabhushan Dr. Moturi Satyanarayan Award

Cleanup Indian honours system Bangladesh Chhatra League Arjuna Award Merge Krishak Praja Party Kalika Temple Maha Kali Mandir Add Sources Sikh Rehat Maryada Antam Sanskar Patna Dental College Wikify Syed Ibrahim Mount Carmel High School, Patna Electricity sector in Iraq Expand Anand Karaj Bankipore Tram transport in India

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Misplaced Pages better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:07, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Sth about "Reliable source"

Hi there. As you told me that the source I provided for the article "Justin Bieber", is not a reliable, so I have few question going to ask you.

• What is the definition of 'reliable source'?
• The viewing count of a Youtube video is a actual fact, so how could the source I provided be unreliable?
• Is that necessary to cite a source for any content? Andyso (talk) 12:47, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

I clicked the wrong link. Sorry for the wrong warning message. I have undone my revert. Boolyme 12:53, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

your reverts

why don't you work on improving the pages instead of just deleting and reverting all my edits, without any objective explanation? i suggest to work on improving wikipedia instead of wasting your time deleting others works--82.213.38.2 (talk) 14:21, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Rahul Dravid

Hiya Boolyme, I saw that you have undid one of my edits on the Rahul Dravid article. I apologize if this is my fault, as I am new to reviewing, but the reason I rejected the revision of that article was to prevent an anonymous (IP) user from removing a piece of information that has been there throughout previous accepted revisions, and without an edit summary. If you have other thoughts on this, please feel free to let me know!  Angelo  ♫  22:42, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Boolyme. You have new messages at Angelo Michael's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Rollback

Hello, this is just to let you know that I've granted you Rollback rights. Just remember:

• Rollback gives you access to certain scripts, including Huggle and Igloo, some of which can be very powerful, so exercise caution
• Rollback is only for blatant vandalism
• Having Rollback rights does not give you any special status or authority
• Misuse of Rollback can lead to its removal by any administrator
• Please read Help:Reverting and Misplaced Pages:Rollback feature to get to know the workings of the feature
• You can test Rollback at Misplaced Pages:New admin school/Rollback
• You may wish to display the {{User wikipedia/rollback}} userbox and/or the {{Rollback}} top icon on your user page

If you have any questions, please do let me know.

Wifione _....... 15:48, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Feedback on article

Thank you for reviewing and kind compliments. I have added the See Also section as you suggested and gone live. Basavanagudi Aquatic Centre. Should I remove the request for feedback now? I could not find any information regarding that. Nanda ramesh (talk) 06:17, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for removing the user draft tag. Added the category "Swimming venues in India". Nice feeling to get the first one out successfully! :) Nanda ramesh (talk) 10:06, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Hello

Dear Sir,

I would like to know as to why do you think my previous contribution to the Rahul Gandhi page was worthy of reversion. It was backed by strong factual citations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Parthpms (talk • contribs) 10:06, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

You can read WP:NPOV. Even though there have been many scandals, unless the exact knowledge comes in public domain, they can't be added as they are potentially libelous. Another thing is that you should discuss on talk page first if you are adding any information like this. Boolyme 08:08, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

It is in the public domain, the only thing is that it is probably not widely publicized. Have a look at this link http://www.zeenews.com/news528156.html#

Warm Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Parthpms (talk • contribs) 14:39, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

The article link which you gave talks about Rajiv Gandhi and not Rahul Gandhi. So, its unnecessary to include it in his page. Boolyme 14:56, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Accepted revision

Why did you accept this revision http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Unsimulated_sex_in_film&diff=412685677&oldid=412550515? This one too http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Unsimulated_sex_in_film&diff=412522473&oldid=411027044 -Andrew c  16:11, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

I was wrong. Thanks for pointing this out. Boolyme 16:55, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Cool. Just be more careful. That's all. Sorry if my questions were short/snide. Carry on! -Andrew c  17:40, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Shree Betal temple

Hello Boolyme. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Shree Betal temple, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The subject of the article is a temple and is therefore not covered by CSD A7. Thank you. Jezebel'sPonyo 17:49, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

I don't know whats the CSD code for temple articles. The basic fact is there are a million temples in India. Shree Betal is one amongst them. Its neither a notable temple nor does the article signifies its importance. There's one link at Vetala which mentions its name. But again, no reference is given for that. It has to be deleted, although under a different tag. Boolyme 17:58, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

There are no speedy deletion criteria that cover buildings (see WP:NOTCSD #7). If you believe that it does not meet notability requirements you are free to pursue other deletion venues. --Jezebel'sPonyo 18:25, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Veena Malik

before telling anyone else you must learn the administration, and if you cant handle leave it, Misplaced Pages is managed by user and if someone make any correction, It is not necessary to show your administration there, in that pic Veena Malik is third from right, and 5th from left is Pakistani Film actress Resham. Zeesolz (talk) 13:17, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

I have the following points that you should note- 1.Have you ever bothered to think what is the use of Discussion Page?. 2. Do you know what References mean? Have you ever bothered to put them while editing wikipedia. 3. The person 3rd from right can be Veena Malik. If you would have been a little less preaching in your advice that you have given free of cost here, you wouldn't have received so many warning messages on your talk page. Boolyme बूलीमी 15:12, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

I noticed the rewrite of the image caption. I think it's much easier to count five people from the left than any number from the right given that on the right side of the image people aren't lined up.

I think this discussion would go smoother by following WP:NEWCOMER. --Ronz (talk) 17:41, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Lipstick lesbian

Hello Boolyme. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Lipstick lesbian, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. Thank you. nancy 10:24, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Kunal majumder

Hello Boolyme, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Kunal majumder, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: since you tagged it, enough has been added, in my view, to get it past A7. It still needs independent references: I will tag it accordingly and keep an eye. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 14:06, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

According to my knowledge of the Indian education system, Mr. Majumdar might be 23 years old now. He is working in Tehelka.com, an online news portal based in Delhi as a correspondent. Its his official duty to write reports. Now, as far as the references given in the article are concerned, 2 is from his website which he can edit at his own free will, 1 is the linkedin profile which even I have, 6 are from Tehelka.com which is his employer and rest 2 are other online sources which may have a tie-up with Tehelka.com. The facts i.e. Introduction, education and family are totally from his personal website. The page creation might have been done to improve the marketability of the Mr. Majumdar. Although I can't say this for sure.

Now, you tell me whether Misplaced Pages should carry a page of a 23-year old who has joined a company two years back and his journalistic contributions have not fetched any major third party references, awards or citations of any kind? Please reply. According to me, he doesn't have any credible claim of significance or importance. Boolyme बूलीमी 14:52, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

No, we shouldn't. The question is whether there is enough "assertion of importance" to get him past A7, which is a much lower bar than "notability". In fact, now that I re-read it, I was probably wrong, misled by it being better wrtten than most NN bios - it doesn't, quite, even get over that bar. My apologies. However, I won't re-tag it now, I will watch for a few days and then PROD and if necessary AfD. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 14:59, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

It's been PRODded by another editor, that will do. If anyone gives him a job on the basis of that article, with a "Notability" flag on top, they deserve what they get. And I don't agree with your giving him a #3 warning: we don't make people read the rules before they edit (I think we should, but that's another matter) so we shouldn't give them #3 warnings with threats of blocking until they have already had, and ignored, earlier warnings. Never mind, it's done, and the article will soon be gone. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 23:14, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Question

You appear to still be very active, is there a particular reason why you have the "retired" template at the top of your page? --Jezebel'sPonyo 19:22, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

naah. nothing in particular. am i violating any rules? Boolyme बूलीमी 22:27, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

The retired template is meant to communicate to others that you are no longer active on Misplaced Pages; if that's not the case you should not have a template that misleads others when they come here to communicate with you. If you simply plan on being around less than you had previously then the 'semi-retired' template is more appropriate. --Jezebel'sPonyo 01:12, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Patna

Why are you unlinking everything? ??? —SpacemanSpiff 18:52, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Please stop it! —SpacemanSpiff 18:53, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Now that you have stopped, please revert yourself, you have removed valid links from about 130 articles. —SpacemanSpiff 18:59, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Don't know what triggered unlinking. How to revert it? Boolyme बूलीमी 19:00, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Since you are a rollbacker, you can go to your contributions (link in my first post) and rollback all these edits. That's the simplest way to go about it. If you wait much longer then someone might make another edit and you'll have to go in and manually change/undo it. —SpacemanSpiff 19:04, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Is there a tool by which I can rollback my previous 130 edits in one click? Otherwise, I will have to wake up whole night to do this :( :( Boolyme बूलीमी 19:06, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

There's a user script, but there are restrictions on use, I'm not aware of the details or which users have it. —SpacemanSpiff 19:10, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Kenny Hawkes

Hello Boolyme. I declined the speedy you suggested for this article, as the subject appears likely to meet our notability guidelines. Thanks, Paul Erik 02:14, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Santosh Sharma for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Santosh Sharma is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Santosh Sharma until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. noq (talk) 20:27, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Your comments on talk:RSS page.

Hi,

I have noticed that you have commented on the talk page.

Though I have pointed out several times, apparently there are no standards for the first line as it is. I think you will be shown a haze of standards, asked to go though it and then clarify everything what you say. At the end, there are many Reliable Sources to back allegations in the first line as well. Watch out, this is Misplaced Pages. ..असक्तः सततं कार्य कर्म समाचर | असक्तः हि आचरन् कर्म.. Humour Thisthat2011 10:02, 31 July 2011 (UTC)