Revision as of 23:14, 31 July 2011 editAndreasegde (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers51,262 edits →Taken off GA list← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:33, 4 August 2011 edit undoAndreasegde (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers51,262 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{GA nominee|19:33, 4 August 2011 (UTC)|nominator=] (])|page=1|subtopic=Places|status=|note=}} | |||
{{WikiProject Yorkshire|class=B|importance=Low}} | {{WikiProject Yorkshire|class=B|importance=Low}} | ||
Revision as of 19:33, 4 August 2011
Swarcliffe is currently a Places good article nominee. Nominated by andreasegde (talk) at 19:33, 4 August 2011 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page.
|
Yorkshire B‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Rating
It has now been upgraded to a B-class. Mine's a pint, ta very much.--andreasegde (talk) 14:35, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
Taken off GA list
I've had enough of this. I will now take all of the articles I have nominated for a GA review off the list. At some time in the future (when some good and reliable GA reviewers return after their summer holidays), I will nominate them again. The GA reviews have become a joke.--andreasegde (talk) 23:08, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
Categories: