Revision as of 17:28, 7 August 2011 editBlethering Scot (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers68,216 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:32, 7 August 2011 edit undoBlethering Scot (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers68,216 edits Comment Exoand to adress acusationsNext edit → | ||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
::It isn't the case at all. if you wish to discuss go to ]]]. ] (]) 17:14, 7 August 2011 (UTC) | ::It isn't the case at all. if you wish to discuss go to ]]]. ] (]) 17:14, 7 August 2011 (UTC) | ||
::You have no consensus therefore the onus is actually on you to prove otherwise not me. The consensus is on the side of the league. I will once again advise you to go to the talk page ]. You do not seem interested to do that just add tags to articles and delete from fully pro without consensus. Also you reply on my talk page not someone else's ] (]) 17:28, 7 August 2011 (UTC) | :::You have no consensus therefore the onus is actually on you to prove otherwise not me. I take part in discussions The consensus is on the side of the league. I will once again advise you to go to the talk page ]. You do not seem interested to do that just add tags to articles and delete from fully pro without consensus that isn't discussing if anything thats being disruptive. I will not get in to an edit war with you. Also you reply on my talk page not someone else's ] (]) 17:28, 7 August 2011 (UTC) | ||
== August 2011 == | == August 2011 == |
Revision as of 17:32, 7 August 2011
Notability
Bobby Barr is a notable player please do not add tags of that nature. The Scottish First Division is listed as fully pro even if it wasn't its a notable League and players in it would Pass GNG. The division will stay on the list untill further consensus is reached which is no where near happening as you already have seen at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Football/Fully professional leagues.Warburton1368 (talk) 17:05, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
- SFL1 is a third-rate competition with semi-pro players. Please provide evidence of enduring significant coverage in reliable sources, for this particular no-mark, before removing the notability tag. Thanks 94.2.38.154 (talk) 17:12, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
- It isn't the case at all. if you wish to discuss go to ]. Warburton1368 (talk) 17:14, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
- You have no consensus therefore the onus is actually on you to prove otherwise not me. I take part in discussions The consensus is on the side of the league. I will once again advise you to go to the talk page Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Football/Fully professional leagues. You do not seem interested to do that just add tags to articles and delete from fully pro without consensus that isn't discussing if anything thats being disruptive. I will not get in to an edit war with you. Also you reply on my talk page not someone else's Warburton1368 (talk) 17:28, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
- It isn't the case at all. if you wish to discuss go to ]. Warburton1368 (talk) 17:14, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
August 2011
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Misplaced Pages, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Football/Fully professional leagues, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Please as advised do not remove the Scottish First Division. Consensus has always been that it should be there. The discussion ongoing at the moment to decide if previous consensus should be changed at the moment this is no where near happening. Do not remove from the list Warburton1368 (talk) 17:09, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.