| Revision as of 22:35, 7 August 2011 editBlethering Scot (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers68,216 edits Final warning: Vandalism on Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Football/Fully professional leagues. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:14, 8 August 2011 edit undoDUCKISJAMMMY (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers19,231 edits →Notability: Please StopNext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| ::::Please read ]. If you wish to pretend that SFL1 is "fully professional" then please find some sources. Asking co-contributors to follow policy is not disruptive AFAIK. ] (]) 17:39, 7 August 2011 (UTC) | ::::Please read ]. If you wish to pretend that SFL1 is "fully professional" then please find some sources. Asking co-contributors to follow policy is not disruptive AFAIK. ] (]) 17:39, 7 August 2011 (UTC) | ||
| :I an going to report this as you seem to be unable to be constructive you know the discussion page is there but you are intent on Not following discussion on consensus if that isnt disruptive. The burden is on you as you are the one trying to change the consensus at wpfooty not me. ] (]) 17:42, 7 August 2011 (UTC) | :I an going to report this as you seem to be unable to be constructive you know the discussion page is there but you are intent on Not following discussion on consensus if that isnt disruptive. The burden is on you as you are the one trying to change the consensus at wpfooty not me. ] (]) 17:42, 7 August 2011 (UTC) | ||
| Hello, your recent edits have had a negative effect on the recently established Scottish taskforce as you have made unhelpful edits on pages which relate to the aforementioned taskforce. You may not be of opinion that your edits were disruptive but you have acted before any consensus or conclusion on the very active & on-going ] debate. If you feel aggrieved that league of Ireland players or other top division sides players are not considered notable due to leagues non fully professional status then create a new section at the discussion page ] & not take out your frustrations on articles relating to the Scottish division 1 . You should also consider adding your opinions about ] as player section of this notability guidance is currently being discussed and edited. The whole point in discussions pages is so we can discuss matters & reach a conclusion, consensus or comprise not so you can appear reasonable by adding your opinion & then doing whatever you like. Please don't consider this some sort of Scottish editor conspiracy as you hinted at in the discussion page as I'm not a Scottish wikipedian please try to be constructive rather than destructive. (★☆ ]☆★) 05:14, 8 August 2011 (UTC)) | |||
| == August 2011 == | == August 2011 == | ||
Revision as of 05:14, 8 August 2011
Notability
Bobby Barr is a notable player please do not add tags of that nature. The Scottish First Division is listed as fully pro even if it wasn't its a notable League and players in it would Pass GNG. The division will stay on the list untill further consensus is reached which is no where near happening as you already have seen at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Football/Fully professional leagues.Warburton1368 (talk) 17:05, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
- SFL1 is a third-rate competition with semi-pro players. Please provide evidence of enduring significant coverage in reliable sources, for this particular no-mark, before removing the notability tag. Thanks 94.2.38.154 (talk) 17:12, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
- It isn't the case at all. if you wish to discuss go to ]. Warburton1368 (talk) 17:14, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
- You have no consensus therefore the onus is actually on you to prove otherwise not me. I take part in discussions The consensus is on the side of the league. I will once again advise you to go to the talk page Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Football/Fully professional leagues. You do not seem interested to do that just add tags to articles and delete from fully pro without consensus that isn't discussing if anything thats being disruptive. I will not get in to an edit war with you. Also you reply on my talk page not someone else's Warburton1368 (talk) 17:28, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
- It isn't the case at all. if you wish to discuss go to ]. Warburton1368 (talk) 17:14, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
- Please read WP:BURDEN. If you wish to pretend that SFL1 is "fully professional" then please find some sources. Asking co-contributors to follow policy is not disruptive AFAIK. 94.2.38.154 (talk) 17:39, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
- I an going to report this as you seem to be unable to be constructive you know the discussion page is there but you are intent on Not following discussion on consensus if that isnt disruptive. The burden is on you as you are the one trying to change the consensus at wpfooty not me. Warburton1368 (talk) 17:42, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello, your recent edits have had a negative effect on the recently established Scottish taskforce as you have made unhelpful edits on pages which relate to the aforementioned taskforce. You may not be of opinion that your edits were disruptive but you have acted before any consensus or conclusion on the very active & on-going Scottish First Division debate. If you feel aggrieved that league of Ireland players or other top division sides players are not considered notable due to leagues non fully professional status then create a new section at the discussion page here & not take out your frustrations on articles relating to the Scottish division 1 . You should also consider adding your opinions about Misplaced Pages:FOOTYN as player section of this notability guidance is currently being discussed and edited. The whole point in discussions pages is so we can discuss matters & reach a conclusion, consensus or comprise not so you can appear reasonable by adding your opinion & then doing whatever you like. Please don't consider this some sort of Scottish editor conspiracy as you hinted at in the discussion page as I'm not a Scottish wikipedian please try to be constructive rather than destructive. (★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★) 05:14, 8 August 2011 (UTC))
August 2011
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Misplaced Pages, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ayr United F.C., did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Warburton1368 (talk) 22:34, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Football/Fully professional leagues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Do not change unless consensus has been reached Warburton1368 (talk) 22:35, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.