Revision as of 07:03, 14 August 2011 editProfessorKilroy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users987 edits →Removing material← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:17, 14 August 2011 edit undoTriiipleThreat (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers53,696 edits →Re: A: EMH, again...: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
So now you wait for replies. If there are none, or if they seem unthinking, then bring up the matter ]. -- ] (]) 05:17, 29 July 2011 (UTC) | So now you wait for replies. If there are none, or if they seem unthinking, then bring up the matter ]. -- ] (]) 05:17, 29 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
== Re: A: EMH, again... == | |||
Just reword or clarify the paragraph. ''Breakout'' is the pilot episode.--] (]) 14:17, 14 August 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:17, 14 August 2011
Welcome (A little late is better than not at all!)
|
Removing material
On this edit of yours: If you think that this material should be removed, explain why at Talk:List of highest-grossing films, and wait several days to get agreement. Other removal will be treated as vandalism. -- Hoary (talk) 05:01, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
I see that you wrote:
- Whilst I believe that they are high-grossing series/franchises and deserve to be in the table, I don't believe they can be in the same table, which is why I am proposing that we use two seperate tables. Rather than having one table for series and franchises, have two tables (one for series and one for franchises- or whatever you wish to call them) to make it clearer.
So now you wait for replies. If there are none, or if they seem unthinking, then bring up the matter here. -- Hoary (talk) 05:17, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
Re: A: EMH, again...
Just reword or clarify the paragraph. Breakout is the pilot episode.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 14:17, 14 August 2011 (UTC)