| Revision as of 22:18, 16 August 2011 editChristopher Connor (talk | contribs)4,312 edits →August 2011: Reply.← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:31, 18 August 2011 edit undoWilliam M. Connolley (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers66,023 edits →Cheraman Juma Masjid: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
| :: All this fuss about what exactly is wrong with the edit should not obscure PaM's main point, which is that the edit is wrong, and should indeed have been removed, as PaM did. CC: I'm disappointed that you've failed to respond to that part and are concentrating on trivia instead ] (]) 21:54, 16 August 2011 (UTC) | :: All this fuss about what exactly is wrong with the edit should not obscure PaM's main point, which is that the edit is wrong, and should indeed have been removed, as PaM did. CC: I'm disappointed that you've failed to respond to that part and are concentrating on trivia instead ] (]) 21:54, 16 August 2011 (UTC) | ||
| :::Yes, I think you have a point. I have been focusing on some aspects of the edit, and ignoring others. But PassaMethod's edits have concerned me for a while and I wanted him to at least acknowledge some of it. I don't know the rules on whether it's allowed to strike out these templates. ] (]) 22:18, 16 August 2011 (UTC) | :::Yes, I think you have a point. I have been focusing on some aspects of the edit, and ignoring others. But PassaMethod's edits have concerned me for a while and I wanted him to at least acknowledge some of it. I don't know the rules on whether it's allowed to strike out these templates. ] (]) 22:18, 16 August 2011 (UTC) | ||
| == Cheraman Juma Masjid == | |||
| Re ]: your revert not only restored the text you like, but also removed other valuable intermediate edits. If you must revert (which I'd argue you should not) then please take care to pick out only the text you dislike. | |||
| As for the substance: please join the discussion on the article talk page ]. At the moment, the view of those contributing is that there are inadequate sources, and the claim itself is inherently unlikely. If you have some special reason for believing it, please articulate it (there, not here) rather than just reverting ] (]) 16:31, 18 August 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:31, 18 August 2011
 Archives | |
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 2 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Assalamu Alaikum - السلام عليكم
Hello dear me wassif:
It's done .I added the location (city/town/village) of the mosque in the description of the file TPL Mosque.JPG . ترجمان05 (talk) 15:59, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
.
ترجمان05 (talk) 16:44, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
Page move problem with Ghulam Ahmed Vastanvi
Greetings, while your initiative in correcting the name is great, unfortunately your page move via copy-paste is not the way to go. When you copy-paste articles, the new article has no History showing how the page developed, it's lost entirely. So insted you want to use the Move button to move an article to a better title, and that way the Talk and History pages will be moved along with it. We can't move it right at the moment since we need to delete the article you copy-pasted which is taking up that space. But once Ghulam Muhammad Vastanvi is deleted, you can move Ghulam Ahmed Vastanvi to that title, and it'll be great. Please see WP:Page move for a detailed explanation on the process. Thanks again for your initiative, and it'll be all the more constructive now that you know the process and can use that to fix similar misnamings on WP. MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:50, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks much. Wasifwasif (talk) 17:56, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
Invite to WikiConference India 2011
| Hi Wasifwasif,
The First WikiConference India is being organized in Mumbai and will take place on 18-20 November 2011. But the activities start now with the 100 day long WikiOutreach. As you are part of WikiProject India community we invite you to be there for conference and share your experience. Thank you for your contributions. We look forward to see you at Mumbai on 18-20 November 2011 |
|---|
Lists of Educational institutions in states and union territories of India
Hello. Please contribute to a discussion about standardising the format for lists of educational institutions in states and union territories of India at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Education_in_India#State_Lists_Format. Thanks.--Siddhartha Ghai (talk) 08:31, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
Your comments are invited for building consensus and finalising the format at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Education_in_India#State_Lists_Format. Thanks.--Siddhartha Ghai (talk) 12:30, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
August 2011
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to List of the oldest mosques in the world, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Pass a Method talk 19:09, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
- Please check the history of List of the oldest mosques in the world page. Wasif (talk) 14:51, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to List of the oldest mosques in the world. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Pass a Method talk 15:07, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
- I've struck the warning (the second one) as invalid. Wasifwasif, if you don't add sources with your edits, people can add messages to your talk page. Christopher Connor (talk) 16:09, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
- And I, in turn, have undone your striking, which was improper. You are at liberty to disagree with the template, and you are at liberty to say so, but not to strike it out.
- All this fuss about what exactly is wrong with the edit should not obscure PaM's main point, which is that the edit is wrong, and should indeed have been removed, as PaM did. CC: I'm disappointed that you've failed to respond to that part and are concentrating on trivia instead William M. Connolley (talk) 21:54, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, I think you have a point. I have been focusing on some aspects of the edit, and ignoring others. But PassaMethod's edits have concerned me for a while and I wanted him to at least acknowledge some of it. I don't know the rules on whether it's allowed to strike out these templates. Christopher Connor (talk) 22:18, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Cheraman Juma Masjid
Re List of the oldest mosques in the world: your revert not only restored the text you like, but also removed other valuable intermediate edits. If you must revert (which I'd argue you should not) then please take care to pick out only the text you dislike.
As for the substance: please join the discussion on the article talk page Talk:List of the oldest mosques in the world. At the moment, the view of those contributing is that there are inadequate sources, and the claim itself is inherently unlikely. If you have some special reason for believing it, please articulate it (there, not here) rather than just reverting William M. Connolley (talk) 16:31, 18 August 2011 (UTC)