Misplaced Pages

User talk:Guerrillamonkey: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:55, 31 August 2011 editGuerrillamonkey (talk | contribs)21 edits Undid revision 441529419 by DumbBOT (talk)← Previous edit Latest revision as of 10:46, 31 August 2011 edit undoLikeLakers2 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,682 edits Fastily unprotected the page, so no need. 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{pp-usertalk|reason=due to vandalism from the blocked user}}

== April 2008 == == April 2008 ==


Latest revision as of 10:46, 31 August 2011

April 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to User talk:Fattyjwoods has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Prashanthns (talk) 22:22, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Fattyjwoods 22:54, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did to User:Fattyjwoods, you will be blocked from editing. Fattyjwoods 23:11, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did to User: Fattyjwoods, you will be blocked from editing.

You have been indefinitly blocked from editing in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Tiptoety 23:23, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

May 2008

Testing, mememe. Little Ol' Lady Who? Guerrillamonkey (talk) 00:02, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Guerrillamonkey (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

make constructive contributions

Decline reason:

All your contributions are harassment and/or vandalism. No reason to unblock. Sam Korn 00:25, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.