| Revision as of 09:19, 6 September 2011 editCunard (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users41,089 edits →User:Amyabaker/Noddle: thank you← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:27, 6 September 2011 edit undoRon Ritzman (talk | contribs)75,721 edits →User:Amyabaker/Noddle: replyNext edit → | ||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
| *{{done}} ] (]) 09:16, 6 September 2011 (UTC) | *{{done}} ] (]) 09:16, 6 September 2011 (UTC) | ||
| **Thank you! I have the draft with my changes. ] (]) 09:19, 6 September 2011 (UTC) | **Thank you! I have the draft with my changes. ] (]) 09:19, 6 September 2011 (UTC) | ||
| I'll trust Anthony's judgement on this matter but normally it's reasonable to protect pages that are temporarily restored for DRV. --] (]) 12:27, 6 September 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:27, 6 September 2011
 | Note to administrators. You are free to undo any of my administrative actions once. I will not consider it wheel warring if you have a good reason. However, if it's an AFD close then please discuss it with me first unless the close is completely backwards. Note to all editors. 75% of you are probably better editors then I am. If you disagree with an edit I make, feel free to revert and discuss. If I'm uncivil or otherwise violating a policy/guideline then let me know. (but please don't use a template :) |
| This is Ron Ritzman's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 |
Deleted Pseudoscience Page Comes Back to Life
- CrossFire Fusor · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) ·
- CrossFire Fusion Reactor · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) ·
- Phase_Displacement_Space_Drive · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) ·
A Wiki page entitled CrossFire Fusor, that was deleted in October 2010, as a result of this AfD debate:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/CrossFire_Fusor
now appears to have come back to life, in a new page here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/CrossFire_Fusor
As discussed in the AfD, the above page appears to be pseudoscientific nonsense, strung together by a 42 year old guy named Moacir L. Ferreira, from Curitiba, Brazil, who has a degree in computational science, and clearly a very active sci-fi imagination.
Another apparent bit of pseudoscience by Moacir L. Ferreira implanted on Misplaced Pages can be found here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Phase_Displacement_Space_Drive
These pages should be nominated for deletion.
Clearly there is an intent to populate Misplaced Pages with his self-published pseudoscience.
Drgao (talk) 08:45, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
Done. However, Phase_Displacement_Space_Drive will have to go to WP:AFD. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 22:09, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
Message to 50.99.244.233 wrt Kunjaliyan
The article was not deleted. It was moved to the article incubator as a result of this discussion because the film has not yet been released. If I had not done this then the article most likely would have been deleted. The article is at Misplaced Pages:Article Incubator/Kunjaliyan. You are welcome to work on it there and when the film is released and/or it gets more coverage then it can be moved back into article space. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:22, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
User:Amyabaker/Noddle
- I received this message. But, as you fully protected page User:Amyabaker/Noddle, I better pass User:Cunard's message to you. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:01, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi Anthony. Would you unprotect User:Amyabaker/Noddle for me so I can update the draft with my changes? See Misplaced Pages:Deletion review/Log/2011 September 3#User:Amyabaker/Noddle for background about the speedy deletion. Thank you, Cunard (talk) 08:49, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- Anthony, you were involved at User talk:Amyabaker/Noddle. I think the full protection in this situation is uncontroversial enough that you can unprotect it yourself. I will have to log off soon, and I'd like to post the changes now instead of later. Cunard (talk) 09:10, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- Done Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:16, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you! I have updated the draft with my changes. Cunard (talk) 09:19, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
I'll trust Anthony's judgement on this matter but normally it's reasonable to protect pages that are temporarily restored for DRV. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 12:27, 6 September 2011 (UTC)