Misplaced Pages

User talk:Colofac: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:01, 18 September 2011 editFluffernutter (talk | contribs)Administrators41,664 edits Blocked: decline← Previous edit Revision as of 15:06, 18 September 2011 edit undoColofac (talk | contribs)352 edits BlockedNext edit →
Line 132: Line 132:
As a consequence of your inappropriate conduct, I am blocking you from editing for a period of one week, and strongly suggest that you reconsider your approach to interacting with other contributors in the future; otherwise, the next block is likely to be indefinite. ]&nbsp;<sup>]]&nbsp;]]</sup> 14:35, 18 September 2011 (UTC) As a consequence of your inappropriate conduct, I am blocking you from editing for a period of one week, and strongly suggest that you reconsider your approach to interacting with other contributors in the future; otherwise, the next block is likely to be indefinite. ]&nbsp;<sup>]]&nbsp;]]</sup> 14:35, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
{{unblock reviewed | 1=The list of reasons provided are mostly to do with an earlier conflict that I had agreed to disengage from and the block is therefore unwarranted. Further to this, I feel I have been hounded by other users related to this discussion. I disagree that I have been overly uncivil regarding this users' conduct. I do however, accept that my conduct related to ] may have been unacceptable, and would be willing to make a full apology on their page for my conduct. | decline=The diffs Kirill lists and a quick glance at your other contributions make it abundantly clear that whether you understand it or not, you ''have'' been incredibly uncivil, to multiple users. It's not about any particular conflict you're in; it's about the fact that you currently don't seem to be able speak to users you disagree with in a calm, non-insulting manner. A successful unblock request here will have to convince us that you understand that the incivility problem is real, and convince us that you don't intend to continue insulting or attacking people. ] (]) 15:01, 18 September 2011 (UTC)}} {{unblock reviewed | 1=The list of reasons provided are mostly to do with an earlier conflict that I had agreed to disengage from and the block is therefore unwarranted. Further to this, I feel I have been hounded by other users related to this discussion. I disagree that I have been overly uncivil regarding this users' conduct. I do however, accept that my conduct related to ] may have been unacceptable, and would be willing to make a full apology on their page for my conduct. | decline=The diffs Kirill lists and a quick glance at your other contributions make it abundantly clear that whether you understand it or not, you ''have'' been incredibly uncivil, to multiple users. It's not about any particular conflict you're in; it's about the fact that you currently don't seem to be able speak to users you disagree with in a calm, non-insulting manner. A successful unblock request here will have to convince us that you understand that the incivility problem is real, and convince us that you don't intend to continue insulting or attacking people. ] (]) 15:01, 18 September 2011 (UTC)}}
::In which case, blank this page and protect it for a week please, If you aren't going to let me edit here, at least prevent the trolls who have caused this to mock me. ] (]) 15:06, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:06, 18 September 2011

Welcome

Hello, Colofac! Welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Misplaced Pages. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Misplaced Pages, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing!   — Jess· Δ 18:48, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Help request (resolved)

check-markThis help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Twinkle has disappeared from my screen and the section to add it has disappeared from my preferences page, why is this? Thanks.

It went from mine - it has now returned to me at least. Probably doing an upgrade. Peridon (talk) 19:02, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
Preferences is back to normal, too. Peridon (talk) 19:03, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Re: User:Medialinkweb - You beat me to it!

Re your message: Just a bit of good timing is all. =) I was checking Recent Changes to User and User talk pages for spam accounts. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:48, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Userboxes

Just so you know, userboxes should comply with the user page guidelines and should not include "statements attacking or vilifying groups of editors or persons" as this can damage relations between editors preventing effective co-operation which is necessary for Misplaced Pages to work. --Mrmatiko (talk) 15:47, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page Colofac (talk) 15:51, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
Talkback template removed, message answered on your talk page. Colofac (talk) 16:09, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Justin bieber live radio

I've deleted this page. Thanks for marking it.

With regard to your exchanges on some talk pages, please don't bite new comers — particularly when they are obviously children. --RA (talk) 09:34, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page Colofac (talk) 09:40, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Header title

Hi Colofac. I took the liberty in changing the section title as it is deemed inappropriate for such situation. --Efe (talk) 09:38, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Its more like a biting title. --Efe (talk) 09:41, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

CSD tags (re)

From now on, I will only tag blant (wrong spelling) vandalism and advertisements --ChristianandJericho 09:47, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

That barnstar was stupid, most of my CSD were accepted --ChristianandJericho 10:34, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar
For spelling Blatant correctly (remove this at anytime) ChristianandJericho 10:39, 18 September 2011 (UTC)


Concerning your edits at User talk:ChristianandJericho

Per WP:OWNTALK, a user is not required to keep most things on their talk page. If the user removes it from their talk page, please don't restore it. Thank you. - SudoGhost 10:43, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

And, furthermore, please disengage from this editor. There is absolutely no need to be this insulting; I know he has serious competence issues, but that's not going to make him listen. If you want to provide constructive criticism, that's a good thing, but those edits were clearly unhelpful. Salvio 11:18, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Competence issues being an understatement. I thought they were tongue-in-cheek, or at least the barn star was. Colofac (talk) 11:20, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
I understood that, but consider he's just 13 and is being closely scrutinised on ANI, which is highly stressful and, as a consequence, has made him go on the defensive; he perceived your joke(s) as attacks and reacted accordingly. Please, just leave him be; if a mentor can help him, that's good; if not and he's blocked due to WP:CIR, that's unfortunate (but unavoidable). Just try not to inflame the situation any further. Salvio 11:36, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
I think it is worth mentioning that this little spat actually sparked up when he got involved in a situation unrelated to him, then tried to nominate the talkpage for speedy deletion, before becoming uncivil. If anything, he has been antagonising me the whole morning. I will take your advice though because I have far more important things to be concerned about. I respect you as a fantastic editor, and someone who I can learn a lot from. :) Colofac (talk) 11:39, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for your kind words! And I'm really glad to see you're trying to defuse the situation: if you feel he's antagonising you again or stalking you, do feel free to ping me on my talk page; I'll see what I can do. I believe he's headed for a block, but I'd like to see if it can be avoided. He's a well-meaning editor, despite his being a bit... Erm, overenthusiastic... Salvio 11:47, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

IP Note

Colofac, I removed a portion of that Iraqi Insurgency article because it is groundless and and does not at all sight its sources

September 2011

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:LikeLakers2. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 13:36, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

I was infact, attacked by this user first. Colofac (talk) 13:37, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Blocked

Colofac, the gratuitous insults and abuse which you've directed towards new users over the course of the past few days (, , , , ) has been utterly unacceptable.

As a consequence of your inappropriate conduct, I am blocking you from editing for a period of one week, and strongly suggest that you reconsider your approach to interacting with other contributors in the future; otherwise, the next block is likely to be indefinite. Kirill  14:35, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Colofac (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The list of reasons provided are mostly to do with an earlier conflict that I had agreed to disengage from and the block is therefore unwarranted. Further to this, I feel I have been hounded by other users related to this discussion. I disagree that I have been overly uncivil regarding this users' conduct. I do however, accept that my conduct related to User:NNU-1-17100215 may have been unacceptable, and would be willing to make a full apology on their page for my conduct.

Decline reason:

The diffs Kirill lists and a quick glance at your other contributions make it abundantly clear that whether you understand it or not, you have been incredibly uncivil, to multiple users. It's not about any particular conflict you're in; it's about the fact that you currently don't seem to be able speak to users you disagree with in a calm, non-insulting manner. A successful unblock request here will have to convince us that you understand that the incivility problem is real, and convince us that you don't intend to continue insulting or attacking people. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 15:01, 18 September 2011 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

In which case, blank this page and protect it for a week please, If you aren't going to let me edit here, at least prevent the trolls who have caused this to mock me. Colofac (talk) 15:06, 18 September 2011 (UTC)