Revision as of 23:03, 23 March 2006 editAltenmann (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers218,979 edits →Welcome← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:05, 23 March 2006 edit undoAltenmann (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers218,979 edits →Possible forms of permissionNext edit → | ||
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
*or you may release under the ] license | *or you may release under the ] license | ||
*or ] with attribution, share-alike (usually abbreviated as "CC-by-sa") A typical text is | *or ] with attribution, share-alike (usually abbreviated as "CC-by-sa") A typical text is | ||
*:"<whatever you want> is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ . | |||
:This basically means that you are free to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work; to make derivative works; and to make commercial use of the work; always by attribution which means that you must attribute the work to <a website or an author>" ] ] 23:03, 23 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
] ] 23:03, 23 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
=='''Dear Administrator'''=== | =='''Dear Administrator'''=== |
Revision as of 23:05, 23 March 2006
You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on an article. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. --Khoikhoi 03:56, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
Abkhazia
You do understand my English, don't you? Talk page and clear points to discuss. Not vague ones, not capitalized or bold text. Clear one! Please, remove tag so far. --tasc 15:05, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
Warning
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. --Khoikhoi 02:07, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
Images
You cannot upload images in wikipedia without permission of photo owners. You cannot assign image tags arbitrarily. Please read Misplaced Pages:Copyrights carefully. This is a very serious issue. The photos you uploaded without author's permission are deleted. mikka (t) 21:50, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
Welcome
Thank you for your contributions. Please learn how wikipedia works and read how other articles about separatist states are written. In your case it is particularly important for you to read and understand the wikipedia's neutrality policy.
We appreciate new contributors, especially from areas not well represented in the internet. However please understand that wikipedia's style is different from newspapers, where people freely use strong words and political cliches. Our goal is to provide correct information without excessive emotions. Facts must speak for themselves.
Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
mikka (t) 22:08, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
Dear Mr mikka, Thanks for your welcoming. Actually those images belong to IAG (International Action Group) Abkhazeti, which gave me authority to use them freely only for web sites. Please let me know if you need official conformation from them.
As for neutrality, we must not forget the facts and truthfulness of these conflicts. I promise to be fair, nutral and always use valid and reliable sources when editing or contributin anything to Wiki.
Thanks for your warm welcome and withing you all the best
Possible forms of permission
Unfortunately "only for websites" permission is not good for use in wikipedia. Misplaced Pages may be released on DVD or as a printed book as well, for sale. Basically, according to the policy wikipedia:Copyrights, the permission for relatively new imafes images may be one of the following types:
- Free; Please see how the permission was made in http://www.mosnews.com/about/copyright.shtml
- or you may release under the GFDL license
- or Creative Commons License with attribution, share-alike (usually abbreviated as "CC-by-sa") A typical text is
- "<whatever you want> is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ .
- This basically means that you are free to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work; to make derivative works; and to make commercial use of the work; always by attribution which means that you must attribute the work to <a website or an author>" mikka (t) 23:03, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
Dear Administrator=
I was unfairly blocked by Mikka for re-editing anti Georgian POV on Abkhazia article. I disputed the article for luck of sources, POV, biased and provocative claims made by possible pro Russian contributors of Wiki. They have ignored my suggestions based on valid sources (historical materials from the academia, exp David Lang, Andersen and WED Allens work).
Also photos which i used in my contribution page were unfairly removed. I have every right of publishing those photos on the net. The owner of those photo materials "International Action Group Abkhazeti" can forward a written conformation regarding the photo use.
I also would like to bring into your attention the issue with Abkhazia article as it is completely false, biased, full of POVs and un-sourced materials. The person who is editing that article (Koikhoi) does not know the difference between situation in Abkhazia and Baltic States. The reader is intentionally misled. Please help! Im ready to provide valid and reliable sources and materials for the topic.
Thank you in advance
LDNoxch Borz 03:42, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
{{unblock}}
- Denied. You were blocked for violating WP:3RR. You are free to edit again when the block expires later today. Wikibofh(talk) 14:38, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
Don't alter my statements please. I compared the sovereignty of Abkhazia to that of the Baltic States after WWII, and you went off on a tangent about churches, historical monuments, ethnic cleansing, and other irrelevant facts. By the way, I have never added anything significant to the article, I am simply reverting your changes which are in a violation of one of our main policies here at Misplaced Pages. If you're going to provide "reliave sources" then they have to be neutral. --Khoikhoi 03:52, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
- And you were blocked for violating the three-revert rule, not adding Georgian POV to a neutral article. --Khoikhoi 03:52, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
- There is no point in arguing with you. You are simply anti Georgian biased individual, who even lacks basic knowledge of the topic. If you conceder historical monuments, churches and ethnic cleansing as irrelevant then i don’t find any reason to even talk to you. Its very sad how un-educated people like you can influence some topics on the net.Noxchi Borz 22:50, 23 March 2006 (UTC)